THE INFORMATION SYSTEMS ACADEMIC DISCIPLINE

This paper reports a descriptive case study of the IS academic discipline in Australia. One in a series of nine papers comprising a special issue of Communications of the AIS (CAIS) titled “The the “beginnings” of a cumulative and ongoing effort to track and report on, and reflect upon the evolution and state of the IS academic discipline in Australia (and Pacific Asia and ultimately other world regions). This paper clarifies the role of the Australian study as a preliminary to the larger Pacific Asia study, and draws upon a series of case studies of Australian states and territories to present the Australian situation. The case study protocol, based in Ridley’s [2006] framework on the evolution of disciplines, suggests an inverse relationship between the impact of local contingencies and a discipline’s degree of professionalism and maturity. Analysis of Australian data reveals considerable diversity in IS research and teaching across the nation, reflecting the wide geographic spread of universities in Australia. Although in general IS research is not highly contingent upon local exigencies and environmental pressures, the topics researched often reflected personal interests and are only weakly coordinated across research sites. At this time IS in Australia does not possess a unique symbol system that allows unambiguous communication between initiates within the field.

[1]  Elsie S. K. Chan,et al.  A Review of Information Systems Programs in Universities in Victoria , 2006, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Gail Ridley,et al.  Characterising Information Systems in Australia: A Theoretical Framework , 2006, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Prashant Palvia,et al.  Research Methodologies in MIS: An Update , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Jim Underwood,et al.  The State of IS in Australian Universities - New South Wales Report , 2006, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Andy Koronios,et al.  The State of Information Systems in Australian Universities - South Australia Report , 2006, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[6]  R. Whitley The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Second Edition: with new introductory chapter entitled 'Science Transformed? The Changing Nature of Knowledge Production at the End of the Twentieth Century') , 1984 .

[7]  Guy G. Gable,et al.  Case Study: The State of Information Systems in Queensland Universities , 2006, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Guy G. Gable,et al.  The Information Systems Discipline in Australian Universities: A Contextual Framework , 2006, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  The 2005 Survey of Information Systems Research in Australia , 2006, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  Case Study: The State of Information Systems in Australian Capital Territory Universities , 2006, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[12]  Chad Lin,et al.  Information Systems in Western Australian Universities , 2006, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Jae-Nam Lee,et al.  Administrative Placement of the Information Systems Academic Discipline: A Comparative SWOT Analysis of Queensland University of Technology and Korea University , 2007, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[14]  R. Whitley The development of management studies as a fragmented adhocracy , 1984 .

[15]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[16]  Roger Clarke,et al.  Key Aspects of the History of the Information Systems Discipline in Australia , 2006, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Mike Metcalfe,et al.  Using Contradictions to Appreciate the History of I.S. Education in South Australia , 2006, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  A Keyword Classification Scheme for IS Research Literature: An Update , 1993 .

[19]  S. Marginson,et al.  The Enterprise University: Power, Governance and Reinvention in Australia , 2000 .