Does frequency in text instantiate entrenchment in the cognitive system

This paper investigates the relation between observed discourse frequencies of linguistic elements and structures, on the one hand, and assumptions concerning the entrenchment of these units in the minds of speakers, on the other. While it is usually assumed that there is a fairly direct correlation between frequency of use and degree of entrenchment, it is argued that many essential questions concerning this relation have remained unanswered so far: What is the role of absolute frequency of occurrence as opposed to frequency relative to a given reference construction? How are relative discourse frequencies to be captured statistically in such a way that, for instance, rare lexical items that typically occur in certain constructions can be differentiated from frequent lexical items which are more versatile but also observed to occur in the same construction, often with considerable absolute frequencies of occurrence? What are the psychological implications of different combinations of high and low absolute and relative frequencies? While the paper suggests solutions to some of these problems it also points to a number of unresolved issues to be addressed in the future and calls for a more modest and cautious way of interpreting quantitative observations in cognitive terms.

[1]  Pamela A. Downing On “Basic Levels” and the Categorization of Objects in English Discourse , 1977 .

[2]  Jeremy Clear,et al.  From Firth Principles — Computational Tools for the Study of Collocation , 1993 .

[3]  Kris Heylen,et al.  Usage-based approaches in Cognitive Linguistics: A technical state of the art , 2005 .

[4]  John Sinclair,et al.  Collins COBUILD English Language Dictionary , 1987 .

[5]  Anatol Stefanowitsch,et al.  New York, Dayton (Ohio), and the Raw Frequency Fallacy , 2005 .

[6]  Gaëtanelle Gilquin The place of prototypicality in corpus linguistics. Causation in the hot seat , 2006 .

[7]  S. Gries,et al.  Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on `alternations' , 2004 .

[8]  David Lightfoot,et al.  Explaining language change: an evolutionary approach , 2002 .

[9]  Adam Kilgarriff,et al.  Putting frequencies in the dictionary , 1997 .

[10]  Stefanie Wulff Online statistics labs , 2005 .

[11]  Stefan Th. Gries,et al.  Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions , 2003 .

[12]  W. Levelt,et al.  Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form , 1994 .

[13]  S. Fiske,et al.  Social Psychology , 2019, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[14]  A. Goldberg Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure , 1995 .

[15]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Frequency effects on French liaison , 2001 .

[16]  Pauline Réage,et al.  The Story of O , 1995 .

[17]  John Sinclair,et al.  Corpus, Concordance, Collocation , 1991 .

[18]  A Caramazza,et al.  The specific-word frequency effect: implications for the representation of homophones in speech production. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  Antje S Meyer,et al.  Specific-word frequency is not all that counts in speech production: comments on Caramazza, Costa, et al. (2001) and new experimental data. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  B. Rudzka-Ostyn Prototypes, Schemas, and cross-category correspondences: the case of ask , 1989 .

[21]  Christian Mair,et al.  Corpus linguistics and grammaticalisation theory: Statistics, frequencies, and beyond , 2004 .

[22]  Hans-Jörg Schmid,et al.  English abstract nouns as conceptual shells : from corpus to cognition , 2000 .

[23]  Stefan Th. Gries,et al.  Corpora and experimental methods: A state-of-the-art review , 2009 .

[24]  George Lakoff,et al.  Categories and cognitive models , 1982 .

[25]  William Croft,et al.  Explaining language change : an evolutionary approach , 2000 .

[26]  H. Schmid NON-COMPOSITIONALITY AND EMERGENT MEANING OF LEXICO-GRAMMATICAL CHUNKS: A CORPUS STUDY OF NOUN PHRASES WITH SENTENTIAL COMPLEMENTS AS CONSTRUCTIONS , 2007 .

[27]  Michael Stubbs,et al.  COLLOCATIONS AND SEMANTIC PROFILES: ON THE CAUSE OF THE TROUBLE WITH QUANTITATIVE STUDIES , 1995 .

[28]  Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen Frequency profiles of some basic grammatical systems: an interim report , 2006 .

[29]  Sebastian Hoffmann Are low-frequency complex prepositions grammaticalized? , 2004 .

[30]  S. Gries,et al.  Converging evidence: Bringing together experimental and corpus data on the association of verbs and constructions , 2005 .

[31]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Mechanisms of Change in Grammaticization: The Role of Frequency , 2008 .

[32]  Daniel Wiechmann On the computation of collostruction strength: Testing measures of association as expressions of lexical bias , 2008 .

[33]  Albert Costa,et al.  What determines the speed of lexical access: homophone or specific-word frequency? A reply to Jescheniak et al. (2003). , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  D. Swinney Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects , 1979 .

[35]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  H. Schmid New Words in the Mind: Concept-formation and Entrenchment of Neologisms , 2008 .

[37]  Joan L. Bybee Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form , 1985 .

[38]  Susan Jean Lindner A lexico-semantic analysis of English verb particle constructions with out and up , 1981 .

[39]  Adam Kilgarriff,et al.  Language is never, ever, ever, random , 2005 .

[40]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The many places of frequency: Evidence for a novel locus of the lexical frequency effect in word production , 2008, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[41]  W. Levelt,et al.  Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form , 1994 .

[42]  Kenneth Ward Church,et al.  Word Association Norms, Mutual Information, and Lexicography , 1989, ACL.

[43]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  From Usage to Grammar: The Mind's Response to Repetition , 2007 .

[44]  E. Rosch Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .

[45]  Sebastian Hoffmann Are Low-Frequency Complex Prepositions Grammaticalized? On the Limits of Corpus Data - and the Importance of Intuition. , 2004 .

[46]  Dirk Geeraerts Prototype Theory and Diachronic Semantics. A Case Study , 1983 .

[47]  Stefan Th. Gries Null-hypothesis significance testing of word frequencies: a follow-up on Kilgarriff , 2005 .

[48]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[49]  Annette Herskovits Language and Spatial Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Study of the Prepositions in English , 2009 .

[50]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  An Evolutionary Approach , 2004 .