Physicochemical sensitivities of tropical peat to electrokinetic environment

Tropical peat is unconsolidated superficial deposits with high non-crystalline colloid (humus) content, constituting the subsurface of wetland systems. Laboratory experiments were carried out on a very slightly decomposed fibric and a highly decomposed amorphous, undisturbed tropical peat soils, to determine the physicochemical effects on the peats due to electrokinetic (EK) treatment in terms of mechanisms and resulting effects in the presence of peat water. The different specimens were treated for 3, 6, 12, and 20-day periods. A constant electrical potential of 40 V was applied across the specimens. The untreated and treated specimens were tested for liquid limit (LL), undrained shear strength (Su), water content (WC), zeta potential (ζ), pH, and cation exchange capacity (CEC). The peat water flew from anode to cathode because of the negative charges on the humus. In the vicinity of the anode, the CEC and ζ of the specimens decreased, and the Su and LL of the specimens increased because of the acidic conditions, while alkaline conditions at the cathode had an opposite effect. The sensitivity of the amorphous peat to the EK environment was higher than the sensitivity of the fibric peat to the EK environment because of larger quantities of the colloids and quality of the charges. The acid/base distributions in EK soil processing influenced the soil surface charges, which were fully pH-dependent, resulting in the variations of the CEC and ζ. The ζ variations caused thinning and expanding of the diffuse double layer around the humus particles, and were linked to the flocculation and dispersion of the particles, and subsequently affected the LL and Su of the specimens. The study was found its significance in that it confirmed the relationship between the degree of peat decomposition and the peat sensitivity to the EK treatment.

[1]  G. Gillman,et al.  Modification to the compulsive exchange method for measuring exchange characteristics of soils , 1986 .

[2]  T. L. Lyon,et al.  The Nature and Properties of Soils , 1930 .

[3]  M. Fieldes Chemical weathering of silicate minerals , 1971 .

[4]  M. Kamon,et al.  Desorption characteristics of kaolin clay contaminated with zinc from electrokinetic soil processing , 2007, Environmental geochemistry and health.

[5]  R. J. Gale,et al.  Electrokinetic stabilization of kaolinite by injection of Al and PO43− ions , 1999 .

[6]  D. I. Boardman,et al.  Electrokinetic stabilisation: an overview and case study , 2004 .

[7]  P. Asavadorndeja,et al.  Electrokinetic strengthening of soft clay using the anode depolarization method , 2005 .

[8]  F. J. Stevenson HUmus Chemistry Genesis, Composition, Reactions , 1982 .

[9]  J. Q. Shang,et al.  Electrokinetics-generated pore fluid and ionic transport in an offshore calcareous soil , 2003 .

[10]  G. Brindley,et al.  Crystal Structures of Clay Minerals and their X-ray Identification , 1982 .

[11]  Yalcin B. Acar,et al.  Principles of electrokinetic remediation , 1993 .

[12]  Ing. L. Casagrande,et al.  Electro-Osmosis in Soils , 1949 .

[13]  T. Yu Chemistry of Variable Charge Soils , 1997 .

[14]  Catherine M. Yule,et al.  Leaf litter decomposition in a tropical peat swamp forest in Peninsular Malaysia , 2009, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[15]  Kyoung-Woong Kim,et al.  Evaluation of Electrokinetic Remediation of Arsenic-contaminated Soils , 2005, Environmental geochemistry and health.

[16]  B. Huat,et al.  Water infiltration characteristics of unsaturated soil slope and its effect on suction and stability , 2006 .

[17]  R. J. Hunter Zeta potential in colloid science : principles and applications , 1981 .

[18]  James K. Mitchell,et al.  FUNDAMENTAL ASPECTS OF ELECTRO-OSMOSIS IN SOILS , 1967 .

[19]  Byungill Kim,et al.  Electroosmosis and pore pressure development characteristics in lead contaminated soil during electrokinetic remediation , 2004 .

[20]  O. Dengiz,et al.  Characteristics, genesis and classification of a basin peat soil under negative human impact in Turkey , 2009 .

[21]  Yalcin B. Acar,et al.  Electrochemical processing of soils: theory of pH gradient development by diffusion, migration, and linear convection. , 1990 .

[22]  David Erickson,et al.  Zeta-potential measurement using the Smoluchowski equation and the slope of the current-time relationship in electroosmotic flow. , 2003, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[23]  Ana M Nieto Castillo,et al.  Changes in chromium distribution during the electrodialytic remediation of a Cr (VI)-contaminated soil , 2008, Environmental geochemistry and health.

[24]  P. Hlaváčková,et al.  Physico-chemical limitations during the electrokinetic treatment of a polluted soil. , 2009 .

[25]  James K. Mitchell,et al.  Fundamentals of soil behavior , 1976 .

[26]  Nader Shariatmadari,et al.  Role of organic matter on electroosmotic properties and ionic modification of organic soils , 2009 .

[27]  David E. Daniel,et al.  IMPACT OF SYSTEM CHEMISTRY ON ELECTROOSMOSIS IN CONTAMINATED SOIL. DISCUSSIONS AND CLOSURE , 1994 .

[28]  Braja M. Das,et al.  Advanced Soil Mechanics , 2019 .

[29]  M. Kleber,et al.  Review: organic matter removal from soils using hydrogen peroxide, sodium hypochlorite, and disodium peroxodisulfate , 2005 .

[30]  H. Fang,et al.  Introductory Geotechnical Engineering: An Environmental Perspective , 2006 .

[31]  C. Weng,et al.  Removal of Cr(III) from Clay Soils by Electrokinetics , 2001 .

[32]  Donald H. Gray,et al.  Electrochemical Hardening of Clay Soils , 1970 .

[33]  A. Alshawabkeh,et al.  Removal of contaminants from soils by electrokinetics: A theoretical treatise , 1992 .