Dynamic treatment units in forest planning using cell proximity

In forest management planning, the dynamic treatment unit (DTU) approach has become an increasingly relevant alternative to the traditional planning approach using fixed stands, due to improved remote sensing techniques and optimization procedures, with the potential for the higher goal fulfillment of forest activities. For the DTU approach, the traditional concept of fixed stands is disregarded, and forest data are kept in units with a high spatial resolution. Forest operations are planned by clustering cells to form treatment units for harvest operations. This paper presents a new model with an exact optimization technique for forming DTUs in forest planning. In comparison with most previous models, this model aims for increased flexibility by modelling the spatial dimension according to cell proximity rather than immediate adjacency. The model is evaluated using a case study with harvest flow constraints for a forest estate in southern Sweden, represented by 3587 cells. The parameter settings differed between cases, resulting in varying degrees of clustered DTUs, which caused relative net present value losses of up to 4.3%. The case without clustering had the lowest net present value when considering entry costs. The solution times varied between 2.2 s and 42 min 6 s and grew rapidly with increasing problem size.

[1]  K. Haugen,et al.  New Forest Owners: Change and Continuity in the Characteristics of Swedish Non-industrial Private Forest Owners (NIPF Owners) 1990–2010 , 2016, Small-scale Forestry.

[2]  H. L. Scheurman,et al.  Techniques for Prescribing Optimal Timber Harvest and Investment Under Different Objectives—Discussion and Synthesis , 1977 .

[3]  Marc E. McDill,et al.  Temporal Connectivity of Mature Patches in Forest Planning Models , 2014 .

[4]  Pete Bettinger,et al.  Forest Management and Planning , 2008 .

[5]  T. Pukkala,et al.  The use of cellular automaton approach in forest planning , 2007 .

[6]  John Sessions,et al.  Intensifying a heuristic forest harvest scheduling search procedure with 2-opt decision choices , 1999 .

[7]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Lidar sampling for large-area forest characterization: A review , 2012 .

[8]  H. Paul Williams Model building in linear and integer programming , 1985 .

[9]  I. Ström Förslag till en förbättrad skogshushållning i Sverige, jemte utkasttill dess systematiska verkställande , 2022 .

[10]  Ilan Vertinsky,et al.  Forest planning using co-evolutionary cellular automata , 2007 .

[11]  Marc E. McDill,et al.  Testing the Use of Lazy Constraints in Solving Area-Based Adjacency Formulations of Harvest Scheduling Models , 2013 .

[12]  Miguel Constantino,et al.  A New Mixed-Integer Programming Model for Harvest Scheduling Subject to Maximum Area Restrictions , 2008, Oper. Res..

[13]  Antti Mäkinen,et al.  Aggregating microsegments into harvest blocks by using spatial optimization and proximity objectives , 2018, Canadian Journal of Forest Research.

[14]  Ljusk Ola Eriksson,et al.  Allowing for spatial consideration in long-term forest planning by linking linear programming with simulated annealing , 2002 .

[15]  Mikko Kurttila,et al.  An Application of a Reduced Cost Approach to Spatial Forest Planning , 2009 .

[16]  Karin Öhman,et al.  Optimizing spatial habitat suitability and timber revenue in long-term forest planning , 2011 .

[17]  J. D. Brodie,et al.  Comparison of a random search algorithm and mixed integer programming for solving area-based forest plans. , 1990 .

[18]  Mikko Kurttila,et al.  Possibilities to aggregate raster cells through spatial optimization in forest planning , 2007 .

[19]  Karin Öhman,et al.  Clustering of harvest activities in multi-objective long-term forest planning , 2003 .

[20]  M. Nilsson,et al.  A nationwide forest attribute map of Sweden predicted using airborne laser scanning data and field data from the National Forest Inventory , 2017 .

[21]  Sören Holm,et al.  On the potential of Kriging for forest management planning , 1998 .

[22]  T. Pukkala,et al.  Influence of timber harvesting costs on the layout of cuttings and economic return in forest planning based on dynamic treatment units , 2018 .

[23]  Marc E. McDill,et al.  Harvest Scheduling with Area-Based Adjacency Constraints , 2002, Forest Science.