Relationship between accurate auscultation of a clinically useful third heart sound and level of experience.

BACKGROUND Poor performance by physicians-in-training and interobserver variability between physicians have diminished clinicians' confidence in the value of the third heart sound (S3). METHODS To determine whether auscultation of a clinically useful S3 improves with advancing levels of experience, we performed a prospective, blinded, observational study of 100 patients undergoing left-sided heart catheterization. Patients underwent blinded auscultation by 4 physicians (each from 1 of 4 different levels of experience), phonocardiography, measurement of blood B-type natriuretic peptide levels, echocardiography for measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction, and cardiac catheterization for measurement of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure. RESULTS Whereas residents' and interns' auscultatory findings demonstrated no significant agreement with phonocardiographic findings, an S3 auscultated by cardiology fellows (kappa = 0.37; P<.001) and cardiology attendings (kappa = 0.29; P = .003) agreed with phonocardiographic findings. Although the sensitivities of the S3 were low (13%-52%) for identifying patients with abnormal measures of left ventricular function, the specificities were high (85%-95%), with the best test characteristics exhibited by phonocardiography and more experienced physicians. The S3 detected by attendings and fellows was superior in distinguishing an elevated B-type natriuretic peptide level, a depressed left ventricular ejection fraction, or an elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (P = .002-.02 for attendings and .02-.03 for fellows) compared with residents (P = .02-.47) or interns (P = .09-.64). CONCLUSIONS The S3 auscultated by more experienced physicians demonstrated fair agreement with phonocardiographic findings. Although correlations were superior for phonocardiography, the associations between the S3 and abnormal markers of left ventricular function improved with each level of auscultator experience.

[1]  N. Reichek,et al.  Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. , 1989, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[2]  T. Hutchinson,et al.  Interobserver agreement by auscultation in the presence of a third heart sound in patients with congestive heart failure. , 1987, Chest.

[3]  C. Conti The stethoscope: The forgotten instrument in cardiology? , 1997, Clinical cardiology.

[4]  D. Glower,et al.  Mechanical correlates of the third heart sound. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  L. Nieman,et al.  Cardiac auscultatory skills of internal medicine and family practice trainees. A comparison of diagnostic proficiency. , 1997, JAMA.

[6]  D. Sackett,et al.  The Ends of Human Life: Medical Ethics in a Liberal Polity , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  J. Wynne,et al.  The clinical meaning of the third heart sound. , 2001, The American journal of medicine.

[8]  Alan S Maisel,et al.  Rapid measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide in the emergency diagnosis of heart failure. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  H Ector,et al.  Prognostic importance of elevated jugular venous pressure and a third heart sound in patients with heart failure. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Charles E McCulloch,et al.  Association between phonocardiographic third and fourth heart sounds and objective measures of left ventricular function. , 2005, JAMA.

[11]  H. Sabbah,et al.  Hemodynamic correlates of the third heart sound during the evolution of chronic heart failure. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  E. Gilpin,et al.  Survival after hospital discharge in matched populations with inferior or anterior myocardial infarction. , 1985, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  R. Gramiak,et al.  Determinants of atrial (S4) and ventricular (S3) gallop sounds in primary myocardial disease. , 1968, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  E. Craige,et al.  Origin of the Third Heart Sound: II. Studies in Human Subjects , 1983, Circulation.

[15]  A J Tajik,et al.  Pathophysiologic determinants of third heart sounds: a prospective clinical and Doppler echocardiographic study. , 2001, The American journal of medicine.

[16]  M. Alam,et al.  Clinical predictors of heart failure in patients with first acute myocardial infarction. , 1999, American heart journal.

[17]  C. McCulloch,et al.  Usefulness of the third heart sound in predicting an elevated level of B-type natriuretic peptide. , 2004, The American journal of cardiology.

[18]  Conti Cr The stethoscope: The forgotten instrument in cardiology? , 1997 .

[19]  M. Drazner,et al.  Third heart sound and elevated jugular venous pressure as markers of the subsequent development of heart failure in patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction. , 2003, The American journal of medicine.

[20]  L. Lenert,et al.  Utility of B-type natriuretic peptide in the diagnosis of congestive heart failure in an urgent-care setting. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  Charles E. McCulloch,et al.  Association between phonocardiographic third and fourth heart sounds and objective measures of left ventricular function. , 2005 .

[22]  M T Hagley,et al.  Relationship of the third heart sound to transmitral flow velocity deceleration. , 1995, Circulation.

[23]  C D Morgan,et al.  The accuracy and interobserver agreement in detecting the 'gallop sounds' by cardiac auscultation. , 1998, Chest.

[24]  L Goldman,et al.  Multifactorial index of cardiac risk in noncardiac surgical procedures. , 1977, The New England journal of medicine.