GENERALIZED INVESTIGATION OF THE ROTATION–ACTIVITY RELATION: FAVORING ROTATION PERIOD INSTEAD OF ROSSBY NUMBER
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A. C. Cameron,et al. Stellar magnetism: empirical trends with age and rotation , 2014, 1404.2733.
[2] A. Choudhuri,et al. A DYNAMO MODEL OF MAGNETIC ACTIVITY IN SOLAR-LIKE STARS WITH DIFFERENT ROTATIONAL VELOCITIES , 2014, 1402.1874.
[3] Paul Charbonneau,et al. STELLAR DYNAMOS AND CYCLES FROM NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF CONVECTION , 2013 .
[4] P. Demarque,et al. THE RADIUS DISCREPANCY IN LOW-MASS STARS: SINGLE VERSUS BINARIES , 2013, 1308.5558.
[5] A. Reiners,et al. RADIUS-DEPENDENT ANGULAR MOMENTUM EVOLUTION IN LOW-MASS STARS. I , 2011, 1111.7071.
[6] Nicholas J. Wright,et al. THE STELLAR-ACTIVITY–ROTATION RELATIONSHIP AND THE EVOLUTION OF STELLAR DYNAMOS , 2011, 1109.4634.
[7] M. Miesch,et al. BUOYANT MAGNETIC LOOPS IN A GLOBAL DYNAMO SIMULATION OF A YOUNG SUN , 2011, 1108.4697.
[8] E. Falco,et al. ON THE ANGULAR MOMENTUM EVOLUTION OF FULLY CONVECTIVE STARS: ROTATION PERIODS FOR FIELD M-DWARFS FROM THE MEarth TRANSIT SURVEY , 2010, 1011.4909.
[9] S. Barnes,et al. ANGULAR MOMENTUM LOSS FROM COOL STARS: AN EMPIRICAL EXPRESSION AND CONNECTION TO STELLAR ACTIVITY , 2010, 1104.2350.
[10] N. R. Landin,et al. Theoretical values of convective turnover times and Rossby numbers for solar-like, pre-main sequence stars , 2010, 1001.2754.
[11] B. Brown,et al. Exploring the P cyc vs. P rot relation relation with flux transport dynamo models of solar-like stars , 2009, 0911.1947.
[12] J. Landstreet,et al. Magnetic Fields of Nondegenerate Stars , 2009, 0904.1938.
[13] E. Guinan,et al. Living with a Red Dwarf: FUV & X-ray emissions of dM stars and effects on hosted Planets , 2009, 0902.3444.
[14] U. Christensen,et al. Energy flux determines magnetic field strength of planets and stars , 2009, Nature.
[15] G. Basri,et al. EVIDENCE FOR MAGNETIC FLUX SATURATION IN RAPIDLY ROTATING M STARS , 2008, 0810.5139.
[16] M. Güdel. X-ray astronomy of stellar coronae , 2004, astro-ph/0406661.
[17] A. Pevtsov,et al. The Relationship Between X-Ray Radiance and Magnetic Flux , 2003 .
[18] N. Pizzolato,et al. The stellar activity-rotation relationship revisited: Dependence of saturated and non-saturated X-ray emission regimes on stellar mass for late-type dwarfs ? , 2003 .
[19] P. Ventura,et al. A new look at the relationship between activity, dynamo number and Rossby number in late-type stars , 2001 .
[20] A. Maggio,et al. On Stellar Coronae and Solar Active Regions , 2000 .
[21] G. Henry,et al. Chromospherically Active Stars. XVIII. Sorting Out the Variability of HD 95559 and Gliese 410 = DS Leonis , 2000 .
[22] S. Baliunas,et al. A Relationship between Mean Rotation Period in Lower Main-Sequence Stars and Its Observed Range , 1996 .
[23] M. Giampapa,et al. The X-Ray View of the Low-Mass Stars in the Solar Neighborhood , 1995 .
[24] G. J. Babu,et al. Linear regression in astronomy. II , 1990 .
[25] J. E. Glynn,et al. Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .
[26] M. Zeilik,et al. Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun , 1986 .
[27] F. Walter,et al. Stellar activity in synchronized binaries. I - Dependence on rotation , 1985 .
[28] S. Baliunas,et al. Rotation, convection, and magnetic activity in lower main-sequence stars , 1984 .
[29] Leon Golub,et al. Relations among stellar X-ray emission observed from Einstein, stellar rotation and bolometric luminosity , 1981 .
[30] R. Rosner,et al. Recent advances in coronal physics. , 1978 .