GENERALIZED INVESTIGATION OF THE ROTATION–ACTIVITY RELATION: FAVORING ROTATION PERIOD INSTEAD OF ROSSBY NUMBER

Magnetic activity in Sun-like and low-mass stars causes X-ray coronal emission which is stronger for more rapidly rotating stars. This relation is often interpreted in terms of the Rossby number, i.e., the ratio of rotation period to convective overturn time. We reconsider this interpretation on the basis of the observed X-ray emission and rotation periods of 821 stars with masses below 1.4 M☉. A generalized analysis of the relation between X-ray luminosity normalized by bolometric luminosity, LX/Lbol, and combinations of rotational period, P, and stellar radius, R, shows that the Rossby formulation does not provide the solution with minimal scatter. Instead, we find that the relation LX/Lbol∝P−2R−4 optimally describes the non-saturated fraction of the stars. This relation is equivalent to LX∝P−2, indicating that the rotation period alone determines the total X-ray emission. Since LX is directly related to the magnetic flux at the stellar surface, this means that the surface flux is determined solely by the star's rotation and is independent of other stellar parameters. While a formulation in terms of a Rossby number would be consistent with these results if the convective overturn time scales exactly as , our generalized approach emphasizes the need to test a broader range of mechanisms for dynamo action in cool stars.

[1]  A. C. Cameron,et al.  Stellar magnetism: empirical trends with age and rotation , 2014, 1404.2733.

[2]  A. Choudhuri,et al.  A DYNAMO MODEL OF MAGNETIC ACTIVITY IN SOLAR-LIKE STARS WITH DIFFERENT ROTATIONAL VELOCITIES , 2014, 1402.1874.

[3]  Paul Charbonneau,et al.  STELLAR DYNAMOS AND CYCLES FROM NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF CONVECTION , 2013 .

[4]  P. Demarque,et al.  THE RADIUS DISCREPANCY IN LOW-MASS STARS: SINGLE VERSUS BINARIES , 2013, 1308.5558.

[5]  A. Reiners,et al.  RADIUS-DEPENDENT ANGULAR MOMENTUM EVOLUTION IN LOW-MASS STARS. I , 2011, 1111.7071.

[6]  Nicholas J. Wright,et al.  THE STELLAR-ACTIVITY–ROTATION RELATIONSHIP AND THE EVOLUTION OF STELLAR DYNAMOS , 2011, 1109.4634.

[7]  M. Miesch,et al.  BUOYANT MAGNETIC LOOPS IN A GLOBAL DYNAMO SIMULATION OF A YOUNG SUN , 2011, 1108.4697.

[8]  E. Falco,et al.  ON THE ANGULAR MOMENTUM EVOLUTION OF FULLY CONVECTIVE STARS: ROTATION PERIODS FOR FIELD M-DWARFS FROM THE MEarth TRANSIT SURVEY , 2010, 1011.4909.

[9]  S. Barnes,et al.  ANGULAR MOMENTUM LOSS FROM COOL STARS: AN EMPIRICAL EXPRESSION AND CONNECTION TO STELLAR ACTIVITY , 2010, 1104.2350.

[10]  N. R. Landin,et al.  Theoretical values of convective turnover times and Rossby numbers for solar-like, pre-main sequence stars , 2010, 1001.2754.

[11]  B. Brown,et al.  Exploring the P cyc vs. P rot relation relation with flux transport dynamo models of solar-like stars , 2009, 0911.1947.

[12]  J. Landstreet,et al.  Magnetic Fields of Nondegenerate Stars , 2009, 0904.1938.

[13]  E. Guinan,et al.  Living with a Red Dwarf: FUV & X-ray emissions of dM stars and effects on hosted Planets , 2009, 0902.3444.

[14]  U. Christensen,et al.  Energy flux determines magnetic field strength of planets and stars , 2009, Nature.

[15]  G. Basri,et al.  EVIDENCE FOR MAGNETIC FLUX SATURATION IN RAPIDLY ROTATING M STARS , 2008, 0810.5139.

[16]  M. Güdel X-ray astronomy of stellar coronae , 2004, astro-ph/0406661.

[17]  A. Pevtsov,et al.  The Relationship Between X-Ray Radiance and Magnetic Flux , 2003 .

[18]  N. Pizzolato,et al.  The stellar activity-rotation relationship revisited: Dependence of saturated and non-saturated X-ray emission regimes on stellar mass for late-type dwarfs ? , 2003 .

[19]  P. Ventura,et al.  A new look at the relationship between activity, dynamo number and Rossby number in late-type stars , 2001 .

[20]  A. Maggio,et al.  On Stellar Coronae and Solar Active Regions , 2000 .

[21]  G. Henry,et al.  Chromospherically Active Stars. XVIII. Sorting Out the Variability of HD 95559 and Gliese 410 = DS Leonis , 2000 .

[22]  S. Baliunas,et al.  A Relationship between Mean Rotation Period in Lower Main-Sequence Stars and Its Observed Range , 1996 .

[23]  M. Giampapa,et al.  The X-Ray View of the Low-Mass Stars in the Solar Neighborhood , 1995 .

[24]  G. J. Babu,et al.  Linear regression in astronomy. II , 1990 .

[25]  J. E. Glynn,et al.  Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[26]  M. Zeilik,et al.  Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun , 1986 .

[27]  F. Walter,et al.  Stellar activity in synchronized binaries. I - Dependence on rotation , 1985 .

[28]  S. Baliunas,et al.  Rotation, convection, and magnetic activity in lower main-sequence stars , 1984 .

[29]  Leon Golub,et al.  Relations among stellar X-ray emission observed from Einstein, stellar rotation and bolometric luminosity , 1981 .

[30]  R. Rosner,et al.  Recent advances in coronal physics. , 1978 .