Affective encoding in the speech signal and in event-related brain potentials

A number of perceptual features have been utilized for the characterization of the emotional state of a speaker. However, for automatic recognition suitable objective features are needed. We have examined several features of the speech signal in relation to accentuation and traces of event-related brain potentials (ERPs) during affective speech perception. Concerning the features of the speech signal we focus on measures related to breathiness and roughness. The objective measures used were an estimation of the harmonics-to-noise ratio, the glottal-to-noise excitation ratio, a measure for spectral flatness, as well as the maximum prediction gain for a speech production model computed by the mutual information function and the ERPs. Results indicate that in particular the maximum prediction gain shows a good differentiation between neutral and non-neutral emotional speaker state. This differentiation is partly comparable to the ERP results that show a differentiation of neutral, positive and negative affect. Other objective measures are more related to accentuation than to emotional state of the speaker.

[1]  E Altenmüller,et al.  The cortical processing of perceived emotion: a DC‐potential study on affective speech prosody , 1997, Neuroreport.

[2]  Hans-Peter Bernhard,et al.  A tight upper bound on the gain of linear and nonlinear predictors for stationary stochastic processes , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[3]  A. Friederici The Time Course of Syntactic Activation During Language Processing: A Model Based on Neuropsychological and Neurophysiological Data , 1995, Brain and Language.

[4]  E Altenmüller,et al.  Cortical activation patterns of affective speech processing depend on concurrent demands on the subvocal rehearsal system. A DC-potential study. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[6]  K. Scherer,et al.  Vocal cues in emotion encoding and decoding , 1991 .

[7]  Kim E. A. Silverman,et al.  Evidence for the independent function of intonation contour type, voice quality, and F0 range in signaling speaker affect , 1985 .

[8]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Handbook of Neuropsychology , 1991 .

[9]  Dirk Michaelis,et al.  Acoustic "breathiness measures" in the description of pathologic voices , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP '98 (Cat. No.98CH36181).

[10]  I R Titze,et al.  Unification of perturbation measures in speech signals. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  John E. Markel,et al.  Linear Prediction of Speech , 1976, Communication and Cybernetics.

[12]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory , 1990 .

[13]  Guus de Krom Spectral correlates of breathiness and roughness for different types of vowel fragments , 1994, ICSLP.

[14]  Hans Werner Strube,et al.  Glottal-to-Noise Excitation Ratio - a New Measure for Describing Pathological Voices , 1997 .

[15]  A. Marchal,et al.  Speech production and speech modelling , 1990 .

[16]  Gudrun Klasmeyer,et al.  The perceptual importance of selected voice quality parameters , 1997, 1997 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[17]  Louis L. Scharf,et al.  Nonlinear maximum likelihood estimation of autoregressive time series , 1995, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[18]  G. Blanken Linguistic Disorders and Pathologies An International Handbook , 1993 .