Sexual Partner Networks in the Transmission of Sexually Transmitted Diseases: An Analysis of Gonorrhea Cases in Sheffield, UK

Background and Objectives: Routine contact tracing data on patients with gonorrhea are used to identify sexual partner networks. These are combined with gonococcal typing data to study patterns of transmission. The role of persons in transmission is discussed. Study Design: Contact tracing data on patients with gonorrhea attending the Royal Hallamshire Hospital in Sheffield in 1988 and 1989 are analyzed. Gonococcal strains identified by auxotype/serovar (A/S) class are combined with these data to identify transmission paths. Results: The network contained 1,272 persons, 724 (77%) of whom had gonorrhea during the study period. Four hundred two clusters of linked cases were identified. The largest cluster, containing 35 persons connected over 16 months, is discussed in greater detail to illustrate how these data may help identify patterns of transmission and the role of persons. Conclusion: Contact tracing data can be used to identify sexual partner networks and to study transmission patterns. Microbiologic data can aid interpretation. An person's risk of acquiring infection depends on indirect links as well as direct links. To understand patterns of transmission it may be important to distinguish between those involved in transmission and those only acquiring infection. Networks established through gonococcal transmission are also relevant to the transmission of other sexually transmitted diseases.

[1]  R. Anderson,et al.  Contact Tracing and the Estimation of Sexual Mixing Patterns: The Epidemiology of Gonococcal Infections , 1993, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[2]  T. Peterman,et al.  A method for identifying persons at high risk for sexually transmitted infections: opportunity for targeting intervention. , 1993, American journal of public health.

[3]  B. Spratt,et al.  Opa‐typing: a high‐resolution tool for studying the epidemiology of gonorrhoea , 1995, Molecular microbiology.

[4]  S. Egglestone,et al.  Auxotyping of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolated in the United Kingdom. , 1983, Journal of medical microbiology.

[5]  K. Holmes,et al.  Serological classification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae with use of monoclonal antibodies to gonococcal outer membrane protein I. , 1984, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[6]  A. Klovdahl,et al.  Social networks and the spread of infectious diseases: the AIDS example. , 1985, Social science & medicine.

[7]  R. May,et al.  Networks of sexual contacts: implications for the pattern of spread of HIV , 1989, AIDS.

[8]  J. Hyman,et al.  Using mathematical models to understand the AIDS epidemic , 1988 .

[9]  W. Darrow,et al.  Repeated gonorrhea: an analysis of importance and risk factors. , 1978, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[10]  A. Renton,et al.  Concordance of auxotype/serovar classes of Neisseria gonorrhoeae between sexual contacts , 1992, Epidemiology and Infection.

[11]  Lisa Sattenspiel,et al.  Modeling and analyzing HIV transmission: the effect of contact patterns , 1988 .

[12]  D. Pryce,et al.  Repeated gonorrhea in Sheffield: the size of the problem, epidemiologic significance, and personal characteristics of repeaters. , 1982 .

[13]  W. Darrow,et al.  Cluster of cases of the acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Patients linked by sexual contact. , 1984, The American journal of medicine.

[14]  K. Holmes,et al.  Sociodemographic distribution of gonorrhea incidence: implications for prevention and behavioral research. , 1991, American journal of public health.

[15]  R M May,et al.  A preliminary study of the transmission dynamics of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the causative agent of AIDS. , 1986, IMA journal of mathematics applied in medicine and biology.