Effects of Target Expansion on Selection Performance in Older Computer Users

Point and click interactions using a mouse are an integral part of computer use for current desktop systems. Compared with younger users though, older adults experience greater difficulties performing cursor positioning tasks, and this can present limitations to using a computer easily and effectively. Target expansion is a technique for improving pointing performance where the target grows dynamically as the cursor approaches. This has the advantage that targets conserve screen real estate in their unexpanded state, yet can still provide the benefits of a larger area to click on. This article presents two studies of target expansion with older and younger participants, involving multidirectional point-select tasks with a computer mouse. Study 1 compares static versus expanding targets, and Study 2 compares static targets with three alternative techniques for expansion. Results show that expansion can improve times by up to 14%, and reduce error rates by up to 50%. Additionally, expanding targets are beneficial even when the expansion happens late in the movement, that is, after the cursor has reached the expanded target area or even after it has reached the original target area. The participants’ subjective feedback on the target expansion are generally favorable, and this lends further support for the technique.

[1]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Manual and gaze input cascaded (MAGIC) pointing , 1999, CHI '99.

[2]  Jacob O. Wobbrock,et al.  A general-purpose target-aware pointing enhancement using pixel-level analysis of graphical interfaces , 2012, CHI.

[3]  Edward Lank,et al.  Speeding pointing in tiled widgets: understanding the effects of target expansion and misprediction , 2010, IUI '10.

[4]  Juan Pablo Hourcade,et al.  Pointassist for older adults: analyzing sub-movement characteristics to aid in pointing tasks , 2010, CHI.

[5]  Juan Pablo Hourcade,et al.  Simple pen interaction performance of young and older adults using handheld computers , 2008, Interact. Comput..

[6]  Jochen Müsseler,et al.  User Specific Design of Interfaces and Interaction Techniques: What Do Older Computer Users Need? , 2007, HCI.

[7]  Joanna McGrenere,et al.  Slipping and drifting: using older users to uncover pen-based target acquisition difficulties , 2007, Assets '07.

[8]  Andy Cockburn,et al.  Human on-line response to visual and motor target expansion , 2006, Graphics Interface.

[9]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Application of Cognitive Theory to Training and Design Solutions for Age-related Computer Use , 1999 .

[10]  Sang D. Choi,et al.  Study of Computer Input Devices and Older Users , 2009 .

[11]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Human on-line response to target expansion , 2003, CHI '03.

[12]  Juan Pablo Hourcade,et al.  PointAssist: helping four year olds point with ease , 2008, IDC.

[13]  Michael Ortega-Binderberger,et al.  Rake cursor: improving pointing performance with concurrent input channels , 2009, CHI.

[14]  Takeo Igarashi,et al.  Ninja cursors: using multiple cursors to assist target acquisition on large screens , 2008, CHI.

[15]  Jacob O. Wobbrock,et al.  From the lab to the world: lessons from extending a pointing technique for real-world use , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[16]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  Age-related differences in movement control: adjusting submovement structure to optimize performance. , 1997, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[17]  Joanna McGrenere,et al.  Exploring Methods to Improve Pen-Based Menu Selection for Younger and Older Adults , 2009, TACC.

[18]  Andy Cockburn,et al.  Multimodal feedback for the acquisition of small targets , 2005, Ergonomics.

[19]  Faustina Hwang,et al.  Bringing the target to the cursor: proxy targets for older adults , 2008, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[20]  Joaquim A. Jorge,et al.  Elderly text-entry performance on touchscreens , 2012, ASSETS '12.

[21]  George E Stelmach,et al.  Age-related kinematic differences as influenced by task difficulty, target size, and movement amplitude. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[22]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of Fitts' law research in HCI , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[23]  Donghun Lee,et al.  Effects of user age and target-expansion methods on target-acquisition tasks using a mouse. , 2012, Applied ergonomics.

[24]  Simeon Keates,et al.  Effect of age and Parkinson's disease on cursor positioning using a mouse , 2005, Assets '05.

[25]  Faustina Hwang,et al.  Cursor relocation techniques to help older adults find 'lost' cursors , 2011, CHI.

[26]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Movement Control in the Older Adult , 2004 .

[27]  E. Wood,et al.  Use of Computer Input Devices by Older Adults , 2005 .

[28]  Renaud Blanch,et al.  Semantic pointing: improving target acquisition with control-display ratio adaptation , 2004, CHI.

[29]  Barbara S. Chaparro,et al.  Can Expanding Targets Make Object Selection Easier for Older Adults , 2003 .

[30]  Ravin Balakrishnan,et al.  The satellite cursor: achieving MAGIC pointing without gaze tracking using multiple cursors , 2010, UIST.

[31]  Simeon Keates,et al.  Developing steady clicks:: a method of cursor assistance for people with motor impairments , 2006, Assets '06.

[32]  Anne Marie Piper,et al.  Exploring the accessibility and appeal of surface computing for older adult health care support , 2010, CHI.

[33]  Ravin Balakrishnan,et al.  Acquisition of expanding targets , 2002, CHI.

[34]  Sang D. Choi,et al.  The impact of age on computer input device use:: Psychophysical and physiological measures , 1999 .

[35]  Simeon Keates,et al.  Using pointing devices: difficulties encountered and strategies employed , 2005 .

[36]  Atsuo Murata,et al.  Usability of Touch-Panel Interfaces for Older Adults , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[37]  J. Sandfeld,et al.  Effect of computer mouse gain and visual demand on mouse clicking performance and muscle activation in a young and elderly group of experienced computer users. , 2005, Applied ergonomics.

[38]  Ravin Balakrishnan,et al.  Fitts' law and expanding targets: Experimental studies and designs for user interfaces , 2005, TCHI.

[39]  Susumu Harada,et al.  The angle mouse: target-agnostic dynamic gain adjustment based on angular deviation , 2009, CHI.

[40]  Joanna McGrenere,et al.  Steadied-bubbles: combining techniques to address pen-based pointing errors for younger and older adults , 2010, CHI.

[41]  Renaud Blanch,et al.  Object Pointing: A Complement to Bitmap Pointing in GUIs , 2004, Graphics Interface.

[42]  Peter Gregor,et al.  The barriers that older novices encounter to computer use , 2010, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[43]  Tovi Grossman,et al.  The bubble cursor: enhancing target acquisition by dynamic resizing of the cursor's activation area , 2005, CHI.

[44]  Joseph Sharit,et al.  Aging, Motor Control, and the Performance of Computer Mouse Tasks , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[45]  McGrenereJoanna,et al.  Exploring Methods to Improve Pen-Based Menu Selection for Younger and Older Adults , 2009 .

[46]  Gerhard Leitner,et al.  An evaluation of sticky and force enhanced targets in multi target situations , 2006, NordiCHI '06.

[47]  Krishna Bharat,et al.  Making computers easier for older adults to use: area cursors and sticky icons , 1997, CHI.

[48]  Oscar Mauricio Serrano Jaimes,et al.  EVALUACION DE LA USABILIDAD EN SITIOS WEB, BASADA EN EL ESTANDAR ISO 9241-11 (International Standard (1998) Ergonomic requirements For office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Parts II: Guidance on usability , 2012 .