Re: Evaluation of Patient- and Surgeon-specific Variations in Patient-reported Urinary Outcomes 3 Months After Radical Prostatectomy from a Statewide Improvement Collaborative.
暂无分享，去创建一个
M. Graefen | X. Cathelineau | A. Mottrie | R. Sanchez-Salas | A. Breda | Lara Rodríguez Sánchez | L. Rodríguez Sánchez
[1] David C. Miller,et al. Evaluation of Patient- and Surgeon-Specific Variations in Patient-Reported Urinary Outcomes 3 Months After Radical Prostatectomy From a Statewide Improvement Collaborative. , 2021, JAMA surgery.
[2] A. Tewari,et al. Hood Technique for Robotic Radical Prostatectomy-Preserving Periurethral Anatomical Structures in the Space of Retzius and Sparing the Pouch of Douglas, Enabling Early Return of Continence Without Compromising Surgical Margin Rates. , 2020, European urology.
[3] A. Mottrie,et al. Assessing the Impact of Surgeon Experience on Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results of Four High-Volume Surgeons. , 2017, Journal of endourology.
[4] E. Barret,et al. Learning curve of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Comprehensive evaluation and cumulative summation analysis of oncological outcomes. , 2017, Urologic oncology.
[5] P. Scardino,et al. Fellowship Training as a Modifier of the Surgical Learning Curve , 2010, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[6] J. Eastham,et al. How do you tell whether a change in surgical technique leads to a change in outcome? , 2010, The Journal of urology.
[7] M. Kattan,et al. The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy. , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.