Ecological information from spatial patterns of plants: insights from point process theory

1 This article reviews the application of some summary statistics from current theory of spatial point processes for extracting information from spatial patterns of plants. Theoretical measures and issues connected with their estimation are described. Results are illustrated in the context of specific ecological questions about spatial patterns of trees in two forests. 2 The pair correlation function, related to Ripley's K function, provides a formal measure of the density of neighbouring plants and makes precise the general notion of a ‘plant's‐eye’ view of a community. The pair correlation function can also be used to describe spatial relationships of neighbouring plants with different qualitative properties, such as species identity and size class. 3 The mark correlation function can be used to describe the spatial relationships of quantitative measures (e.g. biomass). We discuss two types of correlation function for quantitative marks. Applying these functions to the distribution of biomass in a temperate forest, it is shown that the spatial pattern of biomass is uncoupled from the spatial pattern of plant locations. 4 The inhomogeneous pair correlation function enables first‐order heterogeneity in the environment to be removed from second‐order spatial statistics. We illustrate this for a tree species in a forest of high topographic heterogeneity and show that spatial aggregation remains after allowing for spatial variation in density. An alternative method, the master function, takes a weighted average of homogeneous pair correlation functions computed in subareas; when applied to the same data and compared with the former method, the spatial aggregations are smaller in size. 5 Synthesis. These spatial statistics, especially those derived from pair densities, will help ecologists to extract important ecological information from intricate spatially correlated plants in populations and communities.

[1]  E. J. S.,et al.  Quantitative Plant Ecology , 1934, Nature.

[2]  A. Watt,et al.  Pattern and process in the plant community , 1947 .

[3]  E. C. Pielou,et al.  An introduction to mathematical ecology , 1970 .

[4]  K. Kershaw,et al.  Quantitative and Dynamic Plant Ecology , 1973 .

[5]  B. Ripley.  The Second-Order Analysis of Stationary Point Processes , 1976 .

[6]  J. Harper.  Population Biology of Plants , 1979 .

[7]  B. Ripley.  Modelling Spatial Patterns , 1977 .

[8]  R. Cowan.  An introduction to the theory of point processes , 1978 .

[9]  P. Greig-Smith.  Pattern in Vegetation , 1979 .

[10]  John L. Harper,et al.  THE GROWTH, DISTRIBUTION AND NEIGHBOUR RELATIONSHIPS OF TRIFOLIUM REPENS IN A PERMANENT PASTURE , 1989 .

[11]  John L. Harper,et al.  The Growth, Distribution and Neighbour Relationships of Trifolium Repens in a Permanent Pasture: I. Ordination, Pattern and Contact , 1979 .

[12]  J. Ohser,et al.  On estimators for the reduced second moment measure of point processes , 1983 .

[13]  J. H. Looney,et al.  Quantitative and Dynamic Plant Ecology. , 1986 .

[14]  Richard Law,et al.  ON THE SPATIAL ORGANIZATION OF PLANT SPECIES IN A LIMESTONE GRASSLAND COMMUNITY , 1987 .

[15]  B. Ripley.  Statistical inference for spatial processes , 1990 .

[16]  R. Fildes.  Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B): Gary K. Grunwald, Adrian E. Raftery and Peter Guttorp, 1993, “Time series of continuous proportions”, 55, 103–116.☆ , 1993 .

[17]  B. Hambly.  Fractals, random shapes, and point fields , 1994 .

[18]  P. Haase.  Spatial pattern analysis in ecology based on Ripley's K-function: Introduction and methods of edge correction , 1995 .

[19]  T. Mattfeldt.  Stochastic Geometry and Its Applications , 1996 .

[20]  B. Bolker,et al.  Spatial Moment Equations for Plant Competition: Understanding Spatial Strategies and the Advantages of Short Dispersal , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[21]  Raphaël Pélissier,et al.  On explicit formulas of edge effect correction for Ripley's K‐function , 1999 .

[22]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Non‐ and semi‐parametric estimation of interaction in inhomogeneous point patterns , 2000 .

[23]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Spatial patterns in the distribution of tropical tree species. , 2000, Science.

[24]  J. Plotkin,et al.  Species-area curves, spatial aggregation, and habitat specialization in tropical forests. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[25]  van Marie-Colette Lieshout,et al.  Markov Point Processes and Their Applications , 2000 .

[26]  D. Stoyan,et al.  Recent applications of point process methods in forestry statistics , 2000 .

[27]  Adrian Baddeley,et al.  A third order point process characteristic , 2000 .

[28]  Drew W. Purves,et al.  Causes and Effects of Small-Scale Spatial Structure in Plant Populations , 2001 .

[29]  Raphaël Pélissier,et al.  A practical approach to the study of spatial structure in simple cases of heterogeneous vegetation , 2001 .

[30]  R. Law,et al.  Heteromyopia and the spatial coexistence of similar competitors , 2002 .

[31]  Peihua Qiu,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Microstructures in Materials Science , 2002, Technometrics.

[32]  Carol L Cone,et al.  Causes and effects. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[33]  Unité de Biométrie,et al.  A test for spatial relationships between neighbouring plants in plots of heterogeneous plant density , 2003 .

[34]  J. Møller,et al.  Statistical Inference and Simulation for Spatial Point Processes , 2003 .

[35]  R. Pélissier,et al.  Avoiding misinterpretation of biotic interactions with the intertype K12-function: population independence vs. random labelling hypotheses , 2003 .

[36]  Jan M. Rabaey,et al.  Comparison of Methods , 2004 .

[37]  R. Law,et al.  Temporal changes in local spatial structure of late‐successional species: establishment of an Andean caulescent rosette plant , 2004 .

[38]  Thorsten Wiegand,et al.  Rings, circles, and null-models for point pattern analysis in ecology , 2004 .

[39]  Barbara J. Downes,et al.  Spatial point pattern analysis of available and exploited resources , 2004 .

[40]  Uta Berger,et al.  Asymmetric competition as a natural outcome of neighbour interactions among plants: results from the field-of-neighbourhood modelling approach , 2004, Plant Ecology.

[41]  Yasuhiro Kubota,et al.  Spatial analysis for continuously changing point patterns along a gradient and its application to an Abies sachalinensis population , 2004 .

[42]  J. Connolly,et al.  Asymmetric competition between plant species , 1996, Oecologia.

[43]  Bernhard E. Splechtna,et al.  Disturbance history of a European old-growth mixed-species forest – A spatial dendro-ecological analysis , 2005 .

[44]  Jürgen Symanzik,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns , 2005, Technometrics.

[45]  S. Pacala,et al.  Ecological drift in niche-structured communities: neutral pattern does not imply neutral process , 2005 .

[46]  Raisa Mäkipää,et al.  Biomass and stem volume equations for tree species in Europe , 2005, Silva Fennica Monographs.

[47]  J. Suchorzewska.  Głos w dyskusji , 2005 .

[48]  Adrian Baddeley,et al.  spatstat: An R Package for Analyzing Spatial Point Patterns , 2005 .

[49]  J. Symanzik.  Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns (2nd ed.) , 2005 .

[50]  Dietrich Stoyan,et al.  Edge-correction needs in estimating indices of spatial forest structure , 2006 .

[51]  Namir,et al.  Authors , 1947, Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie.

[52]  D. Burslem,et al.  Species–habitat associations in a Sri Lankan dipterocarp forest , 2006, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[53]  E. D. Ford,et al.  Statistical inference using the g or K point pattern spatial statistics. , 2006, Ecology.

[54]  George L. W. Perry,et al.  A comparison of methods for the statistical analysis of spatial point patterns in plant ecology , 2006, Plant Ecology.

[55]  R. Waagepetersen.  An Estimating Function Approach to Inference for Inhomogeneous Neyman–Scott Processes , 2007, Biometrics.

[56]  David F. R. P. Burslem,et al.  Contributions of spatial point process modelling to biodiversity theory , 2007 .

[57]  Thorsten Wiegand,et al.  Species Associations in a Heterogeneous Sri Lankan Dipterocarp Forest , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[58]  Drew W. Purves,et al.  Crown Plasticity and Competition for Canopy Space: A New Spatially Implicit Model Parameterized for 250 North American Tree Species , 2007, PloS one.

[59]  Thorsten Wiegand,et al.  Analyzing the spatial structure of a Sri Lankan tree species with multiple scales of clustering. , 2007, Ecology.

[60]  D. Stoyan,et al.  Statistical Analysis and Modelling of Spatial Point Patterns , 2008 .

[61]  Esko Valkeila,et al.  An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes, Volume II: General Theory and Structure, 2nd Edition by Daryl J. Daley, David Vere‐Jones , 2008 .

[62]  D. Stoyan,et al.  Stochastic Geometry and Its Applications , 1989 .

[63]  James Rosindell,et al.  Unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography , 2010, Scholarpedia.