Reconfiguring practice: the interdependence of experimental procedure and computing infrastructure in distributed earthquake engineering

When transitioning local laboratory practices into distributed environments, the interdependent relationship between experimental procedure and the technologies used to execute experiments becomes highly visible and a focal point for system requirements. We present an analysis of ways in which this reciprocal relationship is reconfiguring laboratory practices in earthquake engineering as a new computing infrastructure is embedded within three laboratories in order to facilitate the execution of shared experiments across geographically distributed sites. The system has been developed as part of the UK Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation e-Research project, which links together three earthquake engineering laboratories at the universities of Bristol, Cambridge and Oxford. We consider the ways in which researchers have successfully adapted their local laboratory practices through the modification of experimental procedure so that they may meet the challenges of coordinating distributed earthquake experiments.

[1]  Andrew C. Simpson,et al.  Collaboration and Trust in Healthcare Innovation: The eDiaMoND Case Study , 2005, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[2]  Adam J Crewe,et al.  UK-NEES - Distributed Hybrid Testing Between Bristol, Cambridge and Oxford Universities: Connecting Structural Dynamics Labs to a Geotechnical Centrifuge , 2010 .

[3]  Marina Jirotka,et al.  Blurring the Distinction between Software Design and Work Practice , 2009 .

[4]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Scientific instrumentation and university research , 1992 .

[5]  Derek deS. Price,et al.  The Science/Technology Relationship, the Craft of Experimental Science, and Policy for the Improvement of High Technology Innovation : Research Policy , 1987 .

[6]  D. Price.  Little Science, Big Science , 1965 .

[7]  Embedding e-Science Applications – Designing and Managing for Usability , 2005 .

[8]  Elihu M. Gerson,et al.  Analyzing due process in the workplace , 1986, COCS '86.

[9]  Hideaki Kuzuoka,et al.  Handling documents and discriminating objects in hybrid spaces , 2006, CHI.

[10]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Pseudodynamic Method for Seismic Testing , 1985 .

[11]  H. Garfinkel.  Studies in Ethnomethodology , 1968 .

[12]  Geoffrey C. Bowker,et al.  Usability research challenges for cyberinfrastructure and tools , 2006, CHI EA '06.

[13]  V. Caron,et al.  United states. , 2018, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[14]  C. Goodwin,et al.  Seeing as a Situated Activity: Formulating Planes* , 1996 .

[15]  David Gavaghan,et al.  Post-genomic science: cross-disciplinary and large-scale collaborative research and its organizational and technological challenges for the scientific research process , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[16]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[17]  S. Woolgar,et al.  Representation in Scientific Practice , 1990 .

[18]  Masayoshi Nakashima.  ROLES OF LARGE STRUCTURAL TESTING FOR THE ADAVANCEMENT OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING , 2008 .

[19]  Marcus Sanchez Svensson,et al.  Configuring Awareness , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[20]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Taking CSCW seriously , 1992, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[21]  Ian Foster,et al.  The Grid 2 - Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure, Second Edition , 1998, The Grid 2, 2nd Edition.

[22]  A. Blakeborough,et al.  Development of Energy Dissipating Devices Using Real Time Hybrid Testing , 2008 .

[23]  Ami Marowka,et al.  The GRID: Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure , 2000, Parallel Distributed Comput. Pract..

[24]  C. Goodwin,et al.  Cognition and communication at work: Seeing as situated activity: Formulating planes , 1996 .

[25]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces , 1992, CSCW '92.

[26]  Daniel Atkins,et al.  Revolutionizing Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure , 2003 .

[27]  A. Weinberg.  Impact of Large-Scale Science on the United States: Big science is here to stay, but we have yet to make the hard financial and educational choices it imposes. , 1961, Science.

[28]  Thomas A. Finholt,et al.  Collaboratories as a new form of scientific organization , 2003 .

[29]  Antony Darby,et al.  The development of real–time substructure testing , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[30]  Hideaki Kuzuoka,et al.  Mediating dual ecologies , 2004, CSCW.

[31]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work * , 1992 .

[32]  Marina Jirotka.  Analysing the Workplace and User Requirements: Challenges for the Development of Methods for Requirements Engineering , 2000 .