On the use of brain-computer interfaces outside scientific laboratories toward an application in domotic environments.

Brain-computer interface (BCI) applications were initially designed to provide final users with special capabilities, like writing letters on a screen, to communicate with others without muscular effort. In these last few years, the BCI scientific community has been interested in bringing BCI applications outside the scientific laboratories, initially to provide useful applications in everyday life and in future in more complex environments, such as space. Recently, we implemented a control of a domestic environment realized with BCI applications. In the present chapter, we analyze the methodological approach employed to allow the interaction between subjects and domestic devices by use of noninvasive EEG recordings. In particular, we analyze whether the cortical activity estimated from noninvasive EEG recordings could be useful in detecting mental states related to imagined limb movements. We estimate cortical activity from high-resolution EEG recordings in a group of healthy subjects by using realistic head models. Such cortical activity was estimated in a region of interest associated with the subjects' Brodmann areas by use of depth-weighted minimum norm solutions. Results show that the use of the estimated cortical activity instead of unprocessed EEG improves the recognition of the mental states associated with limb-movement imagination in a group of healthy subjects. The BCI methodology here presented has been used in a group of disabled patients to give them suitable control of several electronic devices disposed in a three-room environment devoted to neurorehabilitation. Four of six patients were able to control several electronic devices in the domotic context with the BCI system, with a percentage of correct responses averaging over 63%.

[1]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Improved Localization of Cortical Activity By Combining EEG and MEG with MRI Cortical Surface Reconstruction , 2002 .

[2]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[3]  P R Kennedy,et al.  Direct control of a computer from the human central nervous system. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  Febo Cincotti,et al.  Spatial enhancement of EEG data by surface Laplacian estimation: the use of magnetic resonance imaging-based head models , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  BCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Thom F. Oostendorp,et al.  The conductivity of the human skull: results of in vivo and in vitro measurements , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  A. Gevins,et al.  Beyond topographic mapping: Towards functional-anatomical imaging with 124-channel EEGs and 3-D MRIs , 2005, Brain Topography.

[8]  F Babiloni,et al.  Classification of EEG Mental Patterns by Using Two Scalp Electrodes and Mahalanobis Distance-Based Classifiers , 2002, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[9]  P. Rossini,et al.  High-resolution electro-encephalogram: source estimates of Laplacian-transformed somatosensory-evoked potentials using a realistic subject head model constructed from magnetic resonance images , 2000, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[10]  Dawn M. Taylor,et al.  Direct Cortical Control of 3D Neuroprosthetic Devices , 2002, Science.

[11]  Febo Cincotti,et al.  Multimodal integration of high-resolution EEG and functional magnetic resonance imaging data: a simulation study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[12]  P. Nunez,et al.  Neocortical Dynamics and Human EEG Rhythms , 1995 .

[13]  John P. Donoghue,et al.  Connecting cortex to machines: recent advances in brain interfaces , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.