Marten space use and habitat selection in managed coniferous boreal forests of eastern Canada

Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on the behavior of individual organisms may have direct consequences on population viability in altered forest ecosystems. The American marten (Martes americana) is a forest specialist considered as one of the most sensitive species to human-induced disturbances. As some studies have shown that martens cannot tolerate >30–40% clear-cuts within their home range, we investigated marten space use (home range size and overlap) and habitat selection in landscapes fragmented by 2 different patterns of timber harvesting in the black spruce boreal forest: dispersed-cut landscapes (10–80 ha cut-blocks) and clustered-cut landscapes (50–200 ha cut-blocks). We installed radio-collars on female martens and determined 20 winter home ranges (100% minimum convex polygons and 60–90% kernels) in dispersed-cut (n = 8) and clustered-cut (n = 12) landscapes. Home range size was not related to the proportion of clear-cuts (i.e., habitat loss), but rather to the proportion of mixedwood stands 70–120 years old. However, female body condition was correlated to habitat condition inside their home ranges (i.e., amount of residual forest and recent clear-cuts). At the home range scale, we determined that mixedwood forests were also among the most used forest stands and the least used were recent clear-cuts and forested bogs, using resource selection functions. At the landscape scale, home ranges included more mixedwood forests than random polygons and marten high activity zones were composed of more residual forest and less human-induced disturbances (clear-cuts, edges, and roads). These results suggest that mixedwood forests, which occupy approximately 10% of the study area, play a critical role for martens in this conifer-dominated boreal landscape. We recommend permanent retention or special management considerations for these isolated stands, as harvesting mixedwood often leads to forest composition conversion that would reduce the availability of this highly used habitat. © The Wildlife Society, 2013

[1]  Kirsty J. Park,et al.  Martens in the matrix: the importance of nonforested habitats for forest carnivores in fragmented landscapes , 2012 .

[2]  J. Roeder,et al.  Effect of forest fragmentation on space-use patterns in the European pine marten (Martes martes) , 2011 .

[3]  Y. Bergeron,et al.  A simple Bayesian Belief Network for estimating the proportion of old-forest stands in the Clay Belt of Ontario using the provincial forest inventory. , 2010 .

[4]  J. A. Baker,et al.  Mortality risk increases with natal dispersal distance in American martens , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  J. A. Baker,et al.  Effects of post-harvest silviculture on use of boreal forest stands by amphibians and marten in Ontario , 2008 .

[6]  J. Ouellet,et al.  Habitat selection of American marten in a logged landscape at the southern fringe of the boreal forest , 2008 .

[7]  John M Fryxell,et al.  Habitat-mediated variation in predation risk by the American marten. , 2008, Ecology.

[8]  M. Irwin.  Diademed Sifaka (Propithecus diadema) Ranging and Habitat Use in Continuous and Fragmented Forest: Higher Density but Lower Viability in Fragments? , 2008 .

[9]  C. C. Clair,et al.  High levels of habitat loss and fragmentation limit reproductive success by reducing home range size and provisioning rates of Northern saw-whet owls , 2008 .

[10]  Santiago Saura,et al.  A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning : Comparison with existing indices and application to a case study , 2007 .

[11]  M. Flannigan,et al.  Historical fire regime shifts related to climate teleconnections in the Waswanipi area, central Quebec, Canada , 2007 .

[12]  Patrick A. Zollner,et al.  Winter Home-range Characteristics of American Marten (Martes Americana) in Northern Wisconsin , 2007 .

[13]  Luc Bouthillier,et al.  Bridging native and scientific observations of snowshoe hare habitat restoration after clearcutting to set wildlife habitat management guidelines on Waswanipi Cree land , 2007 .

[14]  S. Saura,et al.  Comparison and development of new graph-based landscape connectivity indices: towards the priorization of habitat patches and corridors for conservation , 2006, Landscape Ecology.

[15]  Cameron L. Aldridge,et al.  Application of random effects to the study of resource selection by animals. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[16]  DANA L. THOMAS,et al.  Study Designs and Tests for Comparing Resource Use and Availability II , 2006 .

[17]  J. Gosse,et al.  HOME-RANGE CHARACTERISTICS AND HABITAT USE BY AMERICAN MARTENS IN EASTERN NEWFOUNDLAND , 2005 .

[18]  Angela K. Fuller,et al.  INFLUENCE OF PARTIAL TIMBER HARVESTING ON AMERICAN MARTENS IN NORTH-CENTRAL MAINE , 2005 .

[19]  K. Poole,et al.  Suitability of a young deciduous-dominated forest for American marten and the effects of forest removal , 2004 .

[20]  L. Fahrig.  Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity , 2003 .

[21]  L. Brotóns,et al.  Home range size of willow tits: a response to winter habitat loss , 2003, Oecologia.

[22]  D. Payer,et al.  Influence of forest structure on habitat use by American marten in an industrial forest , 2003 .

[23]  R. Wayne,et al.  Effects of Urbanization and Habitat Fragmentation on Bobcats and Coyotes in Southern California , 2003 .

[24]  A. Desrochers,et al.  Landscape-dependent response to predation risk by forest birds , 2003 .

[25]  Marc Bélisle,et al.  Gap-crossing decisions by forest birds: an empirical basis for parameterizing spatially-explicit, individual-based models , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[26]  J. Schaefer,et al.  Home-range size and habitat selection by American marten (Martes americana) in Labrador , 2002 .

[27]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Gap crossing by chipmunks: an experimental test of landscape connectivity , 2002 .

[28]  M. Villard,et al.  Permeability of three boreal forest landscape types to bird movements as determined from experimental translocations , 2002 .

[29]  V. Selonen,et al.  Space use of the Siberian flying squirrel Ptevomys volans in fragmented forest landscapes , 2001 .

[30]  M. Fortin,et al.  INFLUENCE OF FOREST COVER ON THE MOVEMENTS OF FOREST BIRDS: A HOMING EXPERIMENT , 2001 .

[31]  D. Lesieur,et al.  Natural fire frequency for the eastern Canadian boreal forest: consequences for sustainable forestry , 2001 .

[32]  Shelley A. Hinsley,et al.  The costs of multiple patch use by birds , 2000, Landscape Ecology.

[33]  Erin M. Bayne,et al.  BREEDING BIRD COMMUNITIES IN BOREAL FOREST OF WESTERN CANADA: CONSEQUENCES OF “UNMIXING” THE MIXEDWOODS , 2000 .

[34]  Kim Lowell,et al.  Marten Habitat Selection in a Clearcut Boreal Landscape , 2000 .

[35]  Yves Bergeron,et al.  Coarse woody debris in the southeastern Canadian boreal forest: composition and load variations in relation to stand replacement. , 2000 .

[36]  P. McLoughlin,et al.  A hierarchical pattern of limiting factors helps explain variation in home range size , 2000 .

[37]  Louis Bélanger,et al.  Validité de la carte forestière pour décrire les habitats fauniques à l'échelle locale : une étude de cas en Abitibi-Témiscamingue , 1999 .

[38]  Peter Rothery,et al.  Influence of woodland area on breeding success in Great Tits Parus major and Blue Tits Parus caeruleus , 1999 .

[39]  Joshua J. Millspaugh,et al.  Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates , 1999 .

[40]  P. Richard,et al.  Variability in Fire Frequency and Forest Composition in Canada'sSoutheastern Boreal Forest: A Challenge for Sustainable ForestManagement , 1998 .

[41]  Donald D. Katnik,et al.  Influence of Landscape Pattern on Habitat Use by American Marten in an Industrial Forest , 1998 .

[42]  Wallace P. Erickson,et al.  Habitat Selection Using GIS Data: A Case Study , 1998 .

[43]  R. Ims,et al.  Space-use responses to habitat fragmentation and connectivity in the root vole Microtus oeconomus , 1998 .

[44]  E. Schauber,et al.  Effects of Habitat Loss and Fragmentation on the Behavior and Demography of Gray‐Tailed Voles , 1997 .

[45]  D. M. Phillips,et al.  Seasonal Habitat Selection by Marten in an Untrapped Forest Preserve , 1997 .

[46]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous environments , 1997 .

[47]  R. Powell,et al.  An Evaluation of the Accuracy of Kernel Density Estimators for Home Range Analysis , 1996 .

[48]  S. Redpath.  Habitat fragmentation and the individual : tawny owls Strix aluco in woodland patches , 1995 .

[49]  J. Bissonette,et al.  Marten subnivean access point use: response to subnivean prey levels , 1994 .

[50]  Thomas P. Hodgman,et al.  Spatial relations in a harvested population of marten in Maine , 1994 .

[51]  I. Thompson.  Marten Populations in Uncut and Logged Boreal Forests in Ontario , 1994 .

[52]  P. Colgan,et al.  Marten activity in uncut and logged boreal forests in Ontario , 1994 .

[53]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Conservation of fragmented populations , 1994 .

[54]  L. Wauters,et al.  Space use and dispersal of red squirrels in fragmented habitats , 1994 .

[55]  N. Stenseth,et al.  Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology , 1993 .

[56]  B. Biswell,et al.  Northern Spotted Owls: Influence of Prey Base and Landscape Character , 1992 .

[57]  I. Thompson.  Could marten become the spotted owl of eastern Canada , 1991 .

[58]  P. Colgan,et al.  Prey choice by marten during a decline in prey abundance , 1990, Oecologia.

[59]  S. Buskirk,et al.  Analysis of variability in home-range size of the American marten , 1989 .

[60]  P. Wegge,et al.  Spacing pattern, habitat use and survival of Capercaillie in a fragmented winter habitat , 1989 .

[61]  B. Worton.  Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies , 1989 .

[62]  Steven W. Buskirk,et al.  HOME RANGE, TIME, AND BODY SIZE IN MAMMALS' , 1986 .

[63]  K. Wynne,et al.  Summer home range use by adult marten in northwestern Maine , 1984 .

[64]  W. Zielinski,et al.  Marten habitat preferences in the northern Sierra Nevada , 1983 .

[65]  Douglas H. Johnson.  THE COMPARISON OF USAGE AND AVAILABILITY MEASUREMENTS FOR EVALUATING RESOURCE PREFERENCE , 1980 .

[66]  G. Koehler.  Fire effects on marten habitat in the Selway , 1977 .

[67]  G. Forbes,et al.  Should diet be based on biomass? Importance of larger prey to the American marten , 2001 .

[68]  David C. Payer,et al.  Influences of timber harvesting and trapping on habitat selection and demographic characteristics of marten , 1999 .

[69]  J. Robitaille,et al.  Winter habitat use of American martens Martes americana within second-growth forest in Ontario, Canada , 1997, Wildlife Biology.

[70]  G. Drew.  Winter Habitat Selection by American Marten (Martes americana) in Newfoundland: Why Old Growth? , 1995 .

[71]  Rolf A. Ims,et al.  Movement patterns related to spatial structures , 1995 .

[72]  Per Wegge,et al.  Predicting space use responses to habitat fragmentation: can voles Microtus oeconomus serve as an experimental model system (EMS) for capercaillie grouse Tetrao urogallus in boreal forest? , 1993 .

[73]  J. Bissonette,et al.  Marten use of clear-cuttings and residual forest stands in western Newfoundland , 1987 .

[74]  D. McCullough,et al.  Winter diet and habitat selection of marten in Yosemite National Park , 1984 .

[75]  R. Raine.  Winter habitat use and responses to snow cover of fisher (Martes pennanti) and marten (Martes americana) in southeastern Manitoba , 1983 .