Perceived exertion and the preferred cycling cadence.

PURPOSE To determine whether an association exists between peripheral comfort level, as reflected by differentiated RPE measures, and the preferred cadences of subjects who differed in cycling experience and fitness level. METHODS Twelve experienced cyclists (C), ten runners (R), and ten less-trained noncyclists (LT), all of whom were male, pedaled at three power outputs (C, R: 100, 150, 200 W; LT: 75, 100, 150 W) and six cadences (50, 65, 80, 95, 110 rpm, and their freely chosen cadence) for 5 min per condition. Differentiated ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded during the fifth minute of the exercise. It was hypothesized that the preferred cadence selected by C, R, and LT would be the same as the cadence at which the peripheral RPE was minimized. Comparison of means failed to support this hypothesis. RESULTS Irrespective of rating scale (peripheral, central, overall), the cadences at which RPE was minimized were lower than the preferred cadences, except for LT at 150 W, where there was no significant difference between the preferred cadence and the cadences at which the peripheral and overall RPE were minimized. C tended toward a more curvilinear RPE-cadence relationship compared with R and LT. Mean data for all groups showed that only the peripheral RPE decreased from 50 to 65 rpm, whereas peripheral, overall, and central RPE remained essentially unchanged from 65 to 80 rpm but increased from 80 to 110 rpm. There was a trend for the cadences at which RPE was minimized for C to be higher than the cadences that minimized RPE in either R or LT. For all groups, the cadences at which peripheral RPE was minimized were significantly higher than the cadences at which either the overall or central ratings were minimized. CONCLUSION The small magnitudes of change in the RPE score across cadence, particularly in C and R, suggest that RPE may not be a critical variable in cadence selection during submaximal power output cycling.

[1]  J. Coast,et al.  Optimal pedalling rate in prolonged bouts of cycle ergometry. , 1986, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[2]  E Cafarelli,et al.  Effort of dynamic exercise: influence of load, duration, and task. , 1977, Ergonomics.

[3]  L. Pugh.  The relation of oxygen intake and speed in competition cycling and comparative observations on the bicycle ergometer , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  E C Rhodes,et al.  A Critical Review of the Literature on Ratings Scales for Perceived Exertion , 1985, Sports medicine.

[5]  R. Robertson,et al.  Differentiated Perceptions of Exertion: Part II. Relationship to Local and Central Physiological Responses , 1979, Perceptual and motor skills.

[6]  R. F. Goldman,et al.  Differentiated Ratings of Perceived Exertion during Physical Conditioning of Older Individuals Using Leg-Weight Loading , 1975, Perceptual and motor skills.

[7]  P. E. Martin,et al.  Effect of cycling experience, aerobic power, and power output on preferred and most economical cycling cadences. , 1997, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[8]  B. Ekblom,et al.  The influence of physical training and other factors on the subjective rating of perceived exertion. , 1971, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[9]  Melvin R. Ramey,et al.  Influence of Pedalling Rate and Power Output on Energy Expenditure During Bicycle Ergometry , 1977 .

[10]  K B Pandolf,et al.  Differentiated ratings of perceived exertion during physical exercise. , 1982, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[11]  H Löllgen,et al.  Muscle metabolites, force, and perceived exertion bicycling at varying pedal rates. , 1980, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[12]  K B Pandolf,et al.  The effect of pedalling speed and resistance changes on perceived exertion for equivalent power outputs on the bicycle ergometer. , 1973, Medicine and science in sports.

[13]  J. Hagberg,et al.  Effect of pedaling rate on submaximal exercise responses of competitive cyclists. , 1981, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[14]  G. Borg.  Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress. , 2019, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[15]  M L Hull,et al.  On the relation between joint moments and pedalling rates at constant power in bicycling. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  R J Robertson,et al.  Central signals of perceived exertion during dynamic exercise. , 1982, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[17]  A P Marsh,et al.  The association between cycling experience and preferred and most economical cadences. , 1993, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[18]  K B Pandolf,et al.  Influence of Local and Central Factors in Dominating Rated Perceived Exertion during Physical Work , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.