A framework for producibility and design for manufacturing requirements in a system engineering context

Aircraft engine technology has evolved and matured over a 70 year period under a continous pressure to become more sustainable, fuel efficient, noise efficient, etc. while ensuring robustness and cost efficiency in production and product operation through life. This paper addresses how current challenges, trends and practices enable the introduction of competitive production and through life operation support into new aircraft engine products. Specifically, the area of structural jet engine sub-structures and components is addressed, where product optimization is dominated by weigth optimization, but also characterised by increased expectations of functionality. As a means, novel manufacturing processes are introduced, and one means is to adopt a so called fabrication approach, where the component is build based on assemlying sub-components with better controlled properties into a component using various joining technologies such as welding. The paper presents a framework based on tigther refining a systems engineering and requirements engineering approach that, combined with a set-based engineering approach, allow for building of re-useable and adaptable engineering methods. Through systematically building this framework, and making use of state of the art modeling and simulation technologies, the introduction of the novel technologies necessarily to increase the engine sub-system performance can be realized without compromizing risk and cost. The paper displays by example some of the challenges that successfully have been addressed, and also some remaining that currently drive development of new practises, methods and tools. In conclusion, a more integrated framework to tie a systems engineering approach with the use of advanced modeling and simulation technologies in a reuseable manner, is a way to balance between product performance and producibility. Still the area is undergoing intence development and challenges for research, development and practice still remain.

[1]  Daniel J. McCarthy,et al.  PRODUCIBILITY AND CONFIDENCE INDICES DURING DEFENSE ACQUISITION , 2011 .

[2]  George Chryssolouris,et al.  Manufacturing Systems: Theory and Practice , 1992 .

[3]  Andreas Pahkamaa,et al.  Combining Variation Simulation With Welding Simulation for Prediction of Deformation and Variation of a Final Assembly , 2012, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[4]  Steve Evans,et al.  Product Service Systems and supply network relationships: an exploratory case study , 2019 .

[5]  Daniel T. Koenig Manufacturing Engineering: Principles for Optimization, Third Edition , 2007 .

[6]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Optimizing Locator Position to Maximize Robustness in Critical Product Dimensions , 2009 .

[7]  Daniel T. Koenig Manufacturing Engineering: Principles for Optimization , 1997 .

[8]  Patrik Boart,et al.  Enabling Variation of Manufacturing Process Parameters in Early Stages of Product Development , 2006 .

[9]  Fredrik Elgh,et al.  Computer-Supported Design for Producibility :: Principles and Models for System Realisation and Utilisation , 2007 .

[10]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Robust lifecycle optimization of turbine components using simulation platforms , 2012 .

[11]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Robustness in Aerospace Components Manufacturing and Fabrication - A Case Study , 2011 .

[12]  Andrew P. Sage,et al.  Handbook of Systems Engineering and Management , 2011 .

[13]  Marco Bertoni,et al.  Value‐Driven Design – A methodology to Link Expectations to Technical Requirements in the Extended Enterprise , 2013 .

[14]  Tobias Larsson,et al.  Support for re-use of manufacturing experience in product development , 2011 .

[15]  Daniel Hoopes Improving producibility in aerospace engine manufacturing : process automation vs. process reengineering , 2008 .

[16]  Ola Isaksson,et al.  Virtual Manufacturing of Light Weight Aero Engine Components , 2009 .

[17]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  An approach for producibility and DFM-methodology in aerospace engine component development , 2013 .

[18]  Donovan R. Hardenbrook,et al.  Ready, Set, Dominate: Implement Toyota's Set-Based Learning for Developing Products and Nobody Can Catch You! by Michael Kennedy, Kent Harmon, and Ed Minnock , 2009 .

[19]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Virtual Geometry Assurance For Effective Product Realisation , 2006 .

[20]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[21]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  Toyota's Principles of Set-Based Concurrent Engineering , 1999 .

[22]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Computer Aided Assembly Robustness Evaluation , 1999 .

[23]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Tolerance Simulation of Compliant Sheet Metal Assemblies Using Automatic Node-Based Contact Detection , 2008 .