IS Course Success in Liberal Arts Institutions - What's the Formula?

1. INTRODUCTION This study focuses on teaching the information systems (IS) core course in a business school at a midsized university that does not offer an IS major and where there is much skepticism among the business majors as to the relevance of IS education. The issue of the relevance of IS education particularly to students not pursuing IS careers has been noted by various educators (Baugh, 2011; Hoffman and Blake, 2003; Law, 2003). Baugh (2011) puts the focus squarely on this issue in posing the question: "How do you teach it (IS) and keep the interest of your students?" Law (2003) talks about the challenges of designing IS courses for students who have no intention of pursuing vigorous IS training. The students in the business school of this institution indeed have no intention of pursuing a career in information systems. The university does have a computer science department as part of the college of arts and sciences, but that is completely separate from the business school. The target audience for the IS core course is business students in their senior or junior year, with seniors comprising about half the class, pursuing diverse majors ranging from marketing to finance to human resource management. It is this set of students who question the relevance of technical IS education to their careers, given that the prospect of starting their careers is indeed imminent for the seniors. The particular characteristics of the institutional environment are not the target of this research and are assumed as given. Rather, this study focuses on the efficacy of an IS core course that we designed and delivered, which employed a rather technical active learning approach given the non-technical culture of the institution, and on our novel approach to conceptualizing and measuring IS literacy. The motivation for the selected emphases of this research is not difficult to understand. In spite of the questions raised about the relevance of technical IS education to general business majors, it still remains incumbent upon business schools to produce students that are sufficiently IS-literate and can face the challenges of a complex, technological world. This view of the necessity of making all business students IS-literate regardless of their particular career inclinations is echoed by Tsai (2002) and the National Association of Colleges and Employers (2011). However, how to go about achieving this important objective in non-technical or less-technical institutional environments does not seem to have been addressed adequately in the published literature. We believe that this article provides valuable insight in this matter and would stimulate further research. In this article, we begin by presenting a review of the relevant literature in Section 2 where Section 2.1 discusses the notion of IS literacy and Section 2.2 reviews active learning in IS. With the discussion in Section 2.1 as a backdrop, we develop a novel holistic conceptualization of IS literacy and present it in Section 3. An innovative design of the IS core course for non-IS business majors that implements our active learning approach, which we refer to as the disaggregated mode of technology development, is presented in Section 4. A set of hypotheses to assess the effectiveness of the newly designed IS core course is developed in Section 5. The research methodology and the results on learning outcomes and the hypotheses tested are described in Sections 6 and 7, respectively. Finally, Section 8 presents the conclusions of this study. 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 IS Literacy IS literacy is not about knowing how to use Microsoft Excel or PowerPoint. Instead it is about gaining knowledge of a range of topics from aligning the technology with the business to telecommunication networks to computer security (Laudon and Laudon, 2012). These topics that every business student must know have been identified by Ives et al. …

[1]  Craig Alan VanLengen XBRL: Beyond Basic XML. , 2010 .

[2]  Mark Jones,et al.  A case study of classroom experience with client-based team projects , 2008 .

[3]  Alan S. Abrahams,et al.  An Active, Reflective Learning Cycle for E-Commerce Classes: Learning about E-Commerce by Doing and Teaching , 2010, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[4]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[5]  Ryan T. Wright,et al.  IS 2010: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Information Systems , 2010, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[6]  S. West,et al.  Invalidity of True Experiments , 1990 .

[7]  Mohammad Dadashzadeh,et al.  Information Technology Education in the New Millennium , 2002 .

[8]  Ramakrishna Ayyagari,et al.  Hands-On ERP Learning: Using OpenERP, an Alternative to SAP , 2011, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[9]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[10]  Jeanne M. Baugh Make It Relevant and They Just May Learn It. , 2011 .

[11]  Susan J. Chinn,et al.  Using Web 2.0 to Support the Active Learning Experience , 2009 .

[12]  Terry L. Fox A Case Analysis of Real-World Systems Development Experiences of CIS Students , 2002, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[13]  Gail Corbitt,et al.  Market Power of ERP Education - An Investigative Analysis , 2006, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[14]  J. Barney Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes , 2001 .

[15]  Ronald J. Daigle,et al.  Assessing Student Learning Outcomes in the Introductory Accounting Information Systems Course Using the AICPA's Core Competency Framework , 2007, J. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Nancy Tsai,et al.  Measurement of college computer literacy course , 2000, IRMA Conference.

[17]  Mark E. Hoffman,et al.  Computer literacy: today and tomorrow , 2003 .

[18]  Terri L. Lenox The Value of Service-Learning in the CIS Curriculum: A Case Study , 2007 .

[19]  Casper Draijer,et al.  Best Practices of Business Simulation with SAP R/3 , 2004, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[20]  Brady Chen Teaching Systems Analysis and Design: Bringing the Real World into the Classroom , 2006 .

[21]  Billy B. L. Lim Teaching Web Development Technologies: Past, Present, and (Near) Future , 2002, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[22]  Sandeep Mitra,et al.  Using formal software development methodologies in a real-world student project: an experience report , 2007 .

[23]  Charles H. Davis,et al.  Enterprise Integration in Business Education: Design and Outcomes of a Capstone ERP-based Undergraduate e-Business Management Course , 2004, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[24]  J. Novak Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge , 2009 .

[25]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[26]  Alan N. Attaway,et al.  An Approach to Meeting AACSB Assurance of Learning Standards in an IS Core Course , 2011, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[27]  Ken Surendran,et al.  Enhancing Student Learning across Disciplines: A Case Example using a Systems Analysis and Design Course for MIS and ACS Majors , 2005, J. Inf. Technol. Educ..

[28]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  What Every Business Student Needs to Know About Information Systems , 2002, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[29]  D. Trytten,et al.  Hard But Not Too Hard: Challenging Courses and Engineering Students , 2008 .

[30]  Engbert O. de Brock Integrating Real Practical Experience in ICT Education , 2001, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[31]  Jane Fedorowicz,et al.  Teaching Tip: Twelve Tips for Successfully Integrating Enterprise Systems across the Curriculum , 2004, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[32]  Lynn M. Braender,et al.  Using Web Technology to Teach Students about their Digital World , 2009, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[33]  Scott E. Maxwell,et al.  Internal Invalidity in Pretest-Posttest Self-Report Evaluations and a Re-evaluation of Retrospective Pretests , 1979 .

[34]  Tony C. M. Lam,et al.  A Comparison of Three Retrospective Self-reporting Methods of Measuring Change in Instructional Practice , 2003 .

[35]  George S. Howard,et al.  Response-Shift Bias , 1980 .

[36]  John R. Drake,et al.  A Critical Analysis of Active Learning and an Alternative Pedagogical Framework for Introductory Information Systems Courses , 2012, J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Innov. Pract..

[37]  Clara C. Pratt,et al.  Measuring Program Outcomes: Using Retrospective Pretest Methodology , 2000 .

[38]  Jane P. Laudon,et al.  Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm , 2010 .

[39]  A. Abrahams Creating E-Commerce Start-Ups with Information Systems Students: Lessons Learned from New Venture Successes and Failures. , 2010 .

[40]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  IS 2002 Model Curriculum and Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Information Systems , 1996, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Carl J. Huberty,et al.  Applied MANOVA and discriminant analysis , 2006 .

[42]  David M. Kroenke,et al.  Using MIS , 2005 .

[43]  Juan I. Sanchez,et al.  The Effects of Diversity Awareness Training on Differential Treatment , 2004 .