Communication Media Repertoires: Dealing with the Multiplicity of Media Choices

In today's organizations, employees have an ever-increasing variety of communication media to use in the performance of work activities. In this study, we seek to expand our understanding of media usage in organizations where there is a multiplicity of communication media available to employees. We use communication media repertoires as the lens through which we explore how media is used in the support of communication-based work performed by individuals in complex organizational settings. Data were collected in sales divisions at two large corporations in the information technology industry. We compared multiple media use within and between the two sales divisions, and identified similarities and differences in repertoires. Our findings suggest that use of repertoires is influenced by institutional conditions (e.g., incentives, trust, and physical proximity) and situational conditions (e.g., urgency, task, etc.), and by routine use of the media over time. Based on the findings, we propose a framework for investigating the use of multiple media in organizations through examination of communication media repertoires. Implications of these findings for research and practice are discussed.

[1]  Ned Kock,et al.  The Psychobiological Model: Towards a New Theory of Computer-Mediated Communication Based on Darwinian Evolution , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[2]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Consumer Trust in an Internet Store: A Cross-Cultural Validation , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[3]  N. Phillips,et al.  Analyzing Communication in and Around Organizations: A Critical Hermeneutic Approach , 1993 .

[4]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[5]  R. Daft,et al.  Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations , 1987 .

[6]  J. Crant,et al.  Dyadic Communication Relationships in Organizations: An Attribution/Expectancy Approach , 2000 .

[7]  David L. Paul,et al.  A Field of Study of the Effect of Interpersonal Trust on Virtual Collaborative Relationship Performance , 2004, MIS Q..

[8]  Mary J. Culnan,et al.  The dimensions of perceived accessibility to information: Implications for the delivery of information systems and services , 1985, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[9]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Social construction of communication technology , 1993 .

[10]  M. Markus.  Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice , 1994 .

[11]  Mary J. Culnan,et al.  The dimensions of accessibility to online information: implications for implementing office information systems , 1984, TOIS.

[12]  Carol Stoak Saunders,et al.  The Social Construction of Meaning: An Alternative Perspective on Information Sharing , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Systems , 1997, MIS Q..

[14]  A. P. Chan,et al.  Coordination and Virtualization: the Role of Electronic Networks and Personal Relationships , 1999 .

[15]  Wanda J. Orlikowski.  Learning from Notes: Organizational Issues in Groupware Implementation , 1993, Inf. Soc..

[16]  Raymond E. Levitt,et al.  Interpersonal trust in cross-functional, geographically distributed work: A longitudinal study , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[17]  J. Walther.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1992 .

[18]  Dov Te'eni,et al.  Review: A Cognitive-Affective Model of Organizational Communication for Designing IT , 2001, MIS Q..

[19]  W. Orlikowski.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[20]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness , 1974 .

[21]  Daniel J. McAllister.  Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[22]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  B. Barry,et al.  The Medium and the Message: The Adaptive Use of Communication Media in Dyadic Influence , 2004 .

[24]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  What's your strategy for managing knowledge? , 1999, Harvard business review.

[25]  Allen S. Lee.  Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An Empirical Investigation Using Hermeneutic Interpretation , 1994, MIS Q..

[26]  C. Steinfield,et al.  A Social Influence Model of Technology use , 1990 .

[27]  Rob Kling,et al.  Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors in Information Systems Research , 2003, MIS Q..

[28]  Craig J Thompson.  Interpreting Consumers: A Hermeneutical Framework for Deriving Marketing Insights from the Texts of Consumers’ Consumption Stories , 1997 .

[29]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Media and Group Cohesion: Relative Influences on Social Presence, Task Participation, and Group Consensus , 2001, MIS Q..

[30]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Emerging Theories of Communication in Organizations , 1991 .

[31]  N. Contractor,et al.  Communication networks and new media in organizations , 1990 .

[32]  J. Walther.  Relational Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication: Experimental Observations over Time , 1995 .

[33]  Carol Stoak Saunders,et al.  Information Media and Source Patterns Across Management Levels: A Pilot Study , 1989, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Mary-Beth France Watson-Manheim,et al.  Support for Communication-Based Work Processes in Virtual Work , 2002 .

[35]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations , 1976 .

[36]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Coordination in software development , 1995, CACM.

[37]  Jane S. Webster,et al.  Rational and social theories as complementary explanations of communication media choices: two polic , 1995 .

[38]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[39]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Interaction and outeraction: instant messaging in action , 2000, CSCW '00.

[40]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Genre Repertoire: The Structuring of Communicative Practices in Organizations , 1994 .

[41]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[42]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[43]  D. Straub,et al.  Knowledge Worker Communications and Recipient Availability: Toward a Task Closure Explanation of Media Choice , 1998 .

[44]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[45]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions , 1999 .

[46]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[47]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Reputation, Learning, and Coordination in Distributed Decision-Making Contexts , 1992 .

[48]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  An Investigation of Media Selection Among Directors and Managers: From "Self" to "Other" Orientation , 1998, MIS Q..

[49]  C. Steinfield,et al.  A Social Information Processing Model of Media Use in Organizations , 1987 .

[50]  R. Kraut,et al.  Varieties of Social Influence: the Role of Utility and Norms in the Success of a New Communication Medium , 1998 .

[51]  Jack William Jones,et al.  Temporal Sequences in Information Acquisition for Decision Making: A Focus on Source and Medium , 1990 .