Robust Characterization of the Uterine Myoelectrical Activity in Different Obstetric Scenarios

Electrohysterography (EHG) has been shown to provide relevant information on uterine activity and could be used for predicting preterm labor and identifying other maternal fetal risks. The extraction of high-quality robust features is a key factor in achieving satisfactory prediction systems from EHG. Temporal, spectral, and non-linear EHG parameters have been computed to characterize EHG signals, sometimes obtaining controversial results, especially for non-linear parameters. The goal of this work was to assess the performance of EHG parameters in identifying those robust enough for uterine electrophysiological characterization. EHG signals were picked up in different obstetric scenarios: antepartum, including women who delivered on term, labor, and post-partum. The results revealed that the 10th and 90th percentiles, for parameters with falling and rising trends as labor approaches, respectively, differentiate between these obstetric scenarios better than median analysis window values. Root-mean-square amplitude, spectral decile 3, and spectral moment ratio showed consistent tendencies for the different obstetric scenarios as well as non-linear parameters: Lempel–Ziv, sample entropy, spectral entropy, and SD1/SD2 when computed in the fast wave high bandwidth. These findings would make it possible to extract high quality and robust EHG features to improve computer-aided assessment tools for pregnancy, labor, and postpartum progress and identify maternal fetal risks.

[1]  Jamie Perin,et al.  Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000 , 2012, The Lancet.

[2]  Ivo Damyanov,et al.  On the complexity of finite valued functions , 2015, ArXiv.

[3]  Erik W. Jensen,et al.  EEG complexity as a measure of depth of anesthesia for patients , 2001, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng..

[4]  G. Prats-Boluda,et al.  Comparison of non-invasive electrohysterographic recording techniques for monitoring uterine dynamics. , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.

[5]  G. Saade,et al.  Comparing uterine electromyography activity of antepartum patients versus term labor patients. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  G. Saade,et al.  Predicting Term and Preterm Delivery With Transabdominal Uterine Electromyography , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  Brynjar Karlsson,et al.  Comparison between approximate entropy, correntropy and time reversibility: application to uterine electromyogram signals. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[8]  Javier Mas-Cabo,et al.  Uterine electromyography for discrimination of labor imminence in women with threatened preterm labor under tocolytic treatment , 2018, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[9]  Valerio Persico,et al.  Big Data for Health , 2019, Encyclopedia of Big Data Technologies.

[10]  C. Rabotti,et al.  Accuracy of Frequency-Related Parameters of the Electrohysterogram for Predicting Preterm Delivery: A Review of the Literature , 2009, Obstetrical & gynecological survey.

[11]  W. Maner,et al.  Physiology and electrical activity of uterine contractions. , 2007, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[12]  Danilo P. Mandic,et al.  A Multivariate Multiscale Fuzzy Entropy Algorithm with Application to Uterine EMG Complexity Analysis , 2016, Entropy.

[13]  Oded Raban,et al.  A comparison between electrical uterine monitor, tocodynamometer and intra uterine pressure catheter for uterine activity in labor , 2015, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[14]  F Jager,et al.  Separating sets of term and pre-term uterine EMG records , 2015, Physiological measurement.

[15]  Chuan Chen,et al.  Dedicated Entropy Measures for Early Assessment of Pregnancy Progression From Single-Channel Electrohysterography , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Shalom Darmanjian,et al.  Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods. , 2012, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  Haemorrhage Pph Postpartum haemorrhage , 1911, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[18]  Marta Borowska,et al.  Early diagnosis of threatened premature labor by electrohysterographic recordings – The use of digital signal processing , 2016 .

[19]  O. Langer,et al.  Can myometrial electrical activity identify patients in preterm labor? , 2008, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  Holger Maul,et al.  Use of uterine EMG and cervical LIF in monitoring pregnant patients , 2005, BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[21]  G. Prats-Boluda,et al.  Electrohysterography in the diagnosis of preterm birth: a review , 2018, Physiological measurement.

[22]  G. G. Myers,et al.  Uterine contractions in spontaneous labor. A quantitative study. , 1970, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[23]  Jerzy Sikora,et al.  Recognition of premature threatening labour symptoms from bioelectrical uterine activity signals , 2011 .

[24]  I. Verdenik,et al.  Uterine electrical activity as predictor of preterm birth in women with preterm contractions. , 2001, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[25]  M. Lucovnik,et al.  Noninvasive uterine electromyography for prediction of preterm delivery. , 2011, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[26]  C. Marque,et al.  Use of the electrohysterogram signal for characterization of contractions during pregnancy , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  Chelsea Dobbins,et al.  Prediction of Preterm Deliveries from EHG Signals Using Machine Learning , 2013, PloS one.

[28]  Aly Chkeir,et al.  Patterns of electrical activity synchronization in the pregnant rat uterus , 2013 .

[29]  J. Ball,et al.  Seidel's Guide to Physical Examination , 2014 .

[30]  Brynjar Karlsson,et al.  Uterine electromyogram database and processing function interface: An open standard analysis platform for electrohysterogram signals , 2010, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[31]  C. AbouZahr Global burden of maternal death and disability. , 2003, British medical bulletin.

[32]  G. Saade,et al.  Non-invasive transabdominal uterine electromyography correlates with the strength of intrauterine pressure and is predictive of labor and delivery , 2004, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[33]  A. James,et al.  Oxytocin exposure during labor among women with postpartum hemorrhage secondary to uterine atony. , 2011, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[34]  Ahmad Diab,et al.  Quantitative performance analysis of four methods of evaluating signal nonlinearity: Application to uterine EMG signals , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[35]  Drago Rudel,et al.  A uterine electromyographic activity as a measure of labour progression , 2010 .

[36]  Holger Maul,et al.  Monitoring the progress of pregnancy and labor using electromyography. , 2009, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[37]  D. Rudel,et al.  Evaluating Uterine Electrohysterogram with Entropy , 2007 .

[38]  J D Wilson,et al.  Analysis of uterine contractions: a dynamical approach , 2003, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[39]  J. Jezewski,et al.  Early predicting a risk of preterm labour by analysis of antepartum electrohysterograhic signals , 2016 .

[40]  Manuel Duarte Ortigueira,et al.  A multichannel time-frequency and multi-wavelet toolbox for uterine electromyography processing and visualisation , 2016, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[41]  J. Lawn,et al.  Born Toon Soon: Preterm birth matters , 2013, Reproductive Health.

[42]  Brynjar Karlsson,et al.  Performance analysis of four nonlinearity analysis methods using a model with variable complexity and application to uterine EMG signals. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[43]  C Marque,et al.  Uterine electromyography: a critical review. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[44]  Peng Ren,et al.  Improved Prediction of Preterm Delivery Using Empirical Mode Decomposition Analysis of Uterine Electromyography Signals , 2015, PloS one.

[45]  N. Dimitrova,et al.  Muscle fatigue during dynamic contractions assessed by new spectral indices. , 2006, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[46]  D. Wamalwa,et al.  Prevalence and factors associated with preterm birth at kenyatta national hospital , 2018, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[47]  G. Fele-Zorz,et al.  A comparison of various linear and non-linear signal processing techniques to separate uterine EMG records of term and pre-term delivery groups , 2008, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[48]  Roy Bhaskar,et al.  Nonlinear Methods to Assess Changes in Heart Rate Variability in Type 2 Diabetic Patients , 2013, Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia.

[49]  U. Rajendra Acharya,et al.  Automated detection of premature delivery using empirical mode and wavelet packet decomposition techniques with uterine electromyogram signals , 2017, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[50]  Yiyao Ye-Lin,et al.  Feasibility of Labor Induction Success Prediction based on Uterine Myoelectric Activity Spectral Analysis , 2018, BIOSIGNALS.

[51]  C. Marque,et al.  Spectral characterization of human EHG frequency components based on the extraction and reconstruction of the ridges in the scalogram , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[52]  William L. Maner,et al.  Identification of Human Term and Preterm Labor using Artificial Neural Networks on Uterine Electromyography Data , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.