The prognostic impact of lymphovascular invasion for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A propensity score-weighted analysis

Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) predicts poor survival in patients with pathologically localized or locally advanced upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UT-UC). However, LVI is associated with high tumor grade, tumor necrosis, advanced tumor stage, tumor location, concomitant carcinoma in situ, lymph node metastasis, and sessile tumor architecture. These factors might interfere with the analysis of the impact of LVI on oncological prognosis. To address this, this study aimed to clarify the relationship between LVI and patient prognosis in UT-UC using propensity score weighting. Data were collected from 789 patients with UT-UC treated with radical nephroureterectomy without chemotherapy. We evaluated the significance of LVI in predicting metastasis-free survival (MFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) using propensity score weighting. All weighted baseline characteristics included in the propensity score model were balanced between the LVI (+) and LVI (−) groups. The MFS, CSS, and OS were all significantly poorer in the LVI (+) group. For patients without LVI, the 5-year MFS, CSS, and OS rates were 65.3%, 73.1%, and 67.3%, respectively, whereas the corresponding rates were 50.2%, 63.8 %, and 54.6%, respectively, for patients with LVI. (all P < .001). For patients without LVI, the 10-year MFS, CSS, and OS rates were 61.5%, 69.6%, and 59.2%, respectively, whereas those for patients with LVI were 44.5%, 57.0%, and 42.7%, respectively (all P < .001). LVI is an important pathological feature that predicts metastasis development and worse survival outcome after radical surgery in UT-UC patients.

[1]  Wen-Jeng Wu,et al.  The cancer behavior and current treatment strategy for upper urinary tract cancer , 2022, Urological Science.

[2]  Guihong Liu,et al.  Open Nephroureterectomy Compared to Laparoscopic in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis , 2021, Frontiers in Surgery.

[3]  W. Krajewski,et al.  Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis , 2021, World Journal of Surgical Oncology.

[4]  C. Ohyama,et al.  Unusual presentation of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in Taiwan: Direct comparison from Taiwan‐Japan UTUC Collaboration Cohort , 2020, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[5]  X. Zu,et al.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Benefits Survival in High-Grade Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Based Analysis , 2019, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[6]  B. Bochner,et al.  Prognostic importance of lymphovascular invasion in urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis , 2018, Cancer.

[7]  D. Matsuda,et al.  Selected High‐Risk Patients With Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With Radical Nephroureterectomy for Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Multi‐Institutional Retrospective Study , 2017, Clinical genitourinary cancer.

[8]  K. Shimada,et al.  Clinical utility of bioelectrical impedance analysis in patients with locoregional muscle invasive or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a subanalysis of changes in body composition during neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy , 2018, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[9]  Holger Moch,et al.  The 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part B: Prostate and Bladder Tumours. , 2016, European urology.

[10]  P. Humphrey,et al.  The 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part A: Renal, Penile, and Testicular Tumours. , 2016, European urology.

[11]  Sheau-Fang Yang,et al.  Prognostic Significance of Lymphovascular Invasion in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma is Influenced by Tumor Location , 2015, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[12]  V. Margulis,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves survival of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma , 2014, Cancer.

[13]  Y. Sakamoto,et al.  Changes in Body Composition Secondary to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Advanced Esophageal Cancer are Related to the Occurrence of Postoperative Complications After Esophagectomy , 2014, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[14]  A. Ouzzane,et al.  Impact of lymphovascular invasion on oncological outcomes in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy , 2013, BJU international.

[15]  E. Hall,et al.  Time to define an international standard of postoperative care for resected upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) – opening of the peri‐operative chemotherapy versus surveillance in upper tract urothelial cancer (POUT) Trial , 2012, BJU international.

[16]  J. McKiernan,et al.  Prognostic indicators for upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy: the impact of lymphovascular invasion , 2012, BJU international.

[17]  Jyotsna Sen,et al.  Histopathologic changes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various malignancies , 2012, International journal of applied & basic medical research.

[18]  P. Austin An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies , 2011, Multivariate behavioral research.

[19]  S. Shariat,et al.  Prognostic role of lymphovascular invasion in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: an international validation study. , 2010, European urology.

[20]  J. Epstein,et al.  Non‐invasive papillary urothelial neoplasms: The 2004 WHO/ISUP classification system , 2010, Pathology international.

[21]  N. Cho,et al.  Lymphovascular invasion and pT stage are prognostic factors in patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy for localized upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma. , 2009, Urology.

[22]  K. Bensalah,et al.  Lymphovascular invasion predicts clinical outcomes in patients with node-negative upper tract urothelial carcinoma. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  K. Bensalah,et al.  Risk stratification of patients with nodal involvement in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: value of lymph‐node density , 2009, BJU international.

[24]  K. Naito,et al.  Clinical significance of lymphovascular invasion in upper urinary tract urothelial cancer , 2008, BJU international.

[25]  A. Shalhav,et al.  Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: long-term outcomes , 2008, Current opinion in urology.

[26]  K. Kihara,et al.  Lymphovascular invasion is independently associated with poor prognosis in patients with localized upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma treated surgically. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[27]  J. Patard,et al.  Independent predictors of cancer‐specific survival in transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract , 2007, Cancer.

[28]  Jin-Hwang Liu,et al.  Unusually high incidence of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in Taiwan. , 2002, Urology.

[29]  L. Ellison,et al.  Upper tract urothelial neoplasms: incidence and survival during the last 2 decades. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[30]  S. Kitada,et al.  The prognostic significance of vascular invasion in upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma. , 1992, The Journal of urology.