Program-Level Curriculum Planning: An Exploration of Faculty Perspectives on Two Different Campuses

This study explored faculty views about curriculum planning in academic programs. Using a semistructured format, researchers interviewed 59 faculty members at two very different campuses about their assumptions and the influences upon them as they work with colleagues in planning program curriculum. Although many of the same factors influence course and program planning, we observed that, compared to course planning, program planning is irregular (even infrequent), typically responds to a specific catalyst, and is more dependent upon a supportive institutional climate and leadership. We consider ways that institutional researchers can help provide a supportive climate for responsive and regular planning that will link planning and assessment more closely.

[1]  J. Donald.  The development of thinking processes in postsecondary education: Application of a working model , 1992 .

[2]  Richard W. Moll.  The Scramble to get The New Class Is the Dean of Admissions Now Outside the Academy , 1994 .

[3]  Robert G. Cope,et al.  Opportunity from Strength: Strategic Planning Clarified with Case Examples. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 8, 1987. , 1987 .

[4]  J. S. Stark,et al.  Perspectives on Course and Program Planning. , 1988 .

[5]  A Conceptual Model for the Analysis of Planning Behavior , 1967 .

[6]  Tony Becher,et al.  Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines , 1991 .

[7]  Clifton F. Conrad,et al.  Academic Program Reviews: Institutional Approaches, Expectations, and Controversies. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 5, 1985. , 1985 .

[8]  Lauren Allen Drees.  THE BIGLAN MODEL: AN AUGMENTATION , 1982 .

[9]  J. Donald,et al.  Knowledge Structures: Methods for Exploring Course Content. , 1983 .

[10]  Lisa R. Lattuca,et al.  Will Disciplinary Perspectives Impede Curricular Reform , 1994 .

[11]  A. Biglan.  The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. , 1973 .

[12]  Joan S. Stark,et al.  Planning Introductory College Courses: Influences on Faculty. , 1990 .

[13]  R. Zemsky.  Structure and Coherence: Measuring the Undergraduate Curriculum. Curriculum Data Base Series. , 1989 .

[14]  A. Biglan.  Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. , 1973 .

[15]  Diversity among Disciplines: The Same Goals for All?. , 1993 .

[16]  J. Donald.  University Professors' Views of Knowledge and Validation Processes. , 1990 .

[17]  Jack Lindquist.  Political Linkage: The Academic-Innovation Process. , 1974 .

[18]  Clifton F. Conrad,et al.  Making Decisions about the Curriculum: From Metaphor to Model. , 1983 .

[19]  D. Seymour.  On Q: Causing Quality In Higher Education , 1992 .

[20]  Joan S. Stark,et al.  Improving Teaching and Learning Through Research , 1988 .

[21]  Gretchen G. Martens,et al.  Disciplinary Differences in Course Planning , 2017 .

[22]  D. Seymour.  TQM on Campus: What the Pioneers Are Finding. , 1991 .

[23]  James Ratcliff.  What We Can Learn from Coursework Patterns About Improving the Undergraduate Curriculum. , 1992 .

[24]  Joan S. Stark.  Reflections on Course Planning. Faculty and Students Consider Influences and Goals. From the Program on Curricular Intergration and Student Goals. , 1988 .

[25]  D. Farmer.  Strategies for Change. , 1990 .

[26]  George D. Kuh,et al.  A Typology of Planning Problems. , 1984 .

[27]  William F. Massy,et al.  Departmental Cultures and Teaching Quality: Overcoming “Hollowed” Collegiality , 1994 .

[28]  Ronald W. Roskens,et al.  The Biglan Studies of Differences Among Academic Areas , 2017 .

[29]  Lisa R. Lattuca,et al.  Shaping the College Curriculum: Academic Plans in Action , 1996 .

[30]  C. Schneider,et al.  Strengthening the College Major , 1994 .

[31]  J. Stoecker.  The Biglan classification revisited , 1993 .

[32]  Richard B. Heydinger.  Introduction: Academic Program Planning in Perspective. , 1980 .

[33]  Thomas A. Angelo,et al.  Classroom Assessment Techniques. A Handbook for Faculty. , 1988 .

[34]  Daniel T. Seymour,et al.  Developing Academic Programs: The Climate for Innovation , 1989 .

[35]  J. Friedmann.  A Conceptual Model for the Analysis of Planning Behavior , 1967 .

[36]  Don E. Gardner,et al.  Avoiding Extremes on the Planning Continuum. , 1983 .

[37]  Richard B. Heydinger.  Academic planning for the 1980s , 1980 .

[38]  W. Tierney,et al.  Meeting the Mandate: Renewing the College and Departmental Curriculum. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 6, 1991. , 1992 .