Review of current progress in nanometrology with the helium ion microscope

Scanning electron microscopy has been employed as an imaging and measurement tool for more than 50 years and it continues as a primary tool in many research and manufacturing facilities across the world. A new challenger to this work is the helium ion microscope (HIM). The HIM is a new imaging and metrology technology. Essentially, substitution of the electron source with a helium ion source yields a tool visually similar in function to the scanning electron microscope, but very different in the fundamental imaging and measurement process. The imaged and measured signal originates differently than in the scanning electron microscope and that fact and its single atom source diameter may be able to push the obtainable resolution lower, provide greater depth-of-field and ultimately improve the metrology. Successful imaging and metrology with this instrument entails understanding and modeling of new ion beam/specimen interaction physics. As a new methodology, HIM is beginning to show promise and the abundance of potentially advantageous applications for nanometrology has yet to be fully exploited. This paper discusses some of the progress made at NIST in collaboration with IBM to understand the science behind this new technology.

[1]  Michael T. Postek,et al.  Precision, accuracy, uncertainty and traceability and their application to submicrometer dimensional metrology , 1993 .

[2]  Charles N. Archie,et al.  Benchmarking of advanced CD-SEMs against the new unified specification for sub-0.18-um lithography , 2000, Advanced Lithography.

[3]  R. Gauvin,et al.  CASINO: A new monte carlo code in C language for electron beam interaction —part I: Description of the program , 2006 .

[4]  Michael T. Postek,et al.  Helium ion microscopy and its application to nanotechnology and nanometrology , 2008 .

[5]  T. E. Everhart,et al.  IDEALIZED SPATIAL EMISSION DISTRIBUTION OF SECONDARY ELECTRONS. , 1972 .

[6]  Charles N. Archie,et al.  Modeling and experimental aspects of apparent beam width as an edge resolution measure , 1999, Advanced Lithography.

[7]  Dominique Drouin,et al.  CASINO V2.42: a fast and easy-to-use modeling tool for scanning electron microscopy and microanalysis users. , 2007, Scanning.

[8]  T. Itakura,et al.  Fine pattern lithography using a helium field ion source , 1988 .

[9]  Michael T. Postek,et al.  Active monitoring and control of electron-beam-induced contamination , 2001, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[10]  R. Gauvin,et al.  CASINO: A new monte carlo code in C language for electron beam interactions—part II: Tabulated values of the mott cross section , 1997 .

[11]  Charles N. Archie,et al.  Benchmarking of Advanced CD-SEMs Against the New Unified Specification for Sub-0.18 Micrometer Lithography | NIST , 2000 .

[12]  Peters Kr,et al.  Working at higher magnifications in scanning electron microscopy with secondary and backscattered electrons on metal coated biological specimens and imaging macromolecular cell membrane structures. , 1985 .

[13]  Michael T. Postek,et al.  Helium Ion Microscopy: a New Technique for Semiconductor Metrology and Nanotechnology , 2007 .

[14]  Brendan Griffin,et al.  A model of secondary electron imaging in the helium ion scanning microscope. , 2009, Ultramicroscopy.

[15]  E. Marx,et al.  X-Ray Lithography Mask Metrology: Use of Transmitted Electrons in an SEM for Linewidth Measurement , 1993, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[16]  T. E. Everhart,et al.  Determination of Kilovolt Electron Energy Dissipation vs Penetration Distance in Solid Materials , 1971 .

[17]  David C. Joy,et al.  Modeling for metrology with a helium beam , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[18]  Nicholas P. Economou,et al.  Helium ion microscope: A new tool for nanoscale microscopy and metrology , 2006 .

[19]  Michael T. Postek,et al.  Instrumentation, metrology, and standards: key elements for the future of nanomanufacturing , 2007, SPIE NanoScience + Engineering.

[20]  Michael T. Postek,et al.  On the Sub-Nanometer Resolution of Scanning Electron and Helium Ion Microscopes , 2009, Microscopy Today.

[21]  David G. Seiler,et al.  Characterization and metrology for ULSI technology , 2006 .

[22]  John S. Villarrubia,et al.  Sensitivity of scanning electron microscope width measurements to model assumptions , 2009 .

[23]  John A. Allgair,et al.  Results of benchmarking of advanced CD-SEMs at the 90-nm CMOS technology node , 2004, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[24]  András E. Vladár,et al.  Contamination specification for dimensional metrology SEMs , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[25]  Charles N. Archie,et al.  New apparent beam width artifact and measurement methodology for CD-SEM resolution monitoring , 2003, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[26]  Jeremiah R. Lowney,et al.  Monte Carlo modeling of secondary electron imaging in three dimensions , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[27]  J. Notte,et al.  Understanding imaging modes in the helium ion microscope , 2009 .

[28]  Joel K. W. Yang,et al.  Scanning-helium-ion-beam lithography with hydrogen silsesquioxane resist , 2009 .

[29]  David C. Joy,et al.  Device metrology with high-performance scanning ion beams , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[30]  C. Oatley,et al.  The scanning electron microscope. , 1966, Science progress.