This experiment was conducted to determine the effects of angle of attack on lift, drag, pitching moment and pressure distribution during the flow of NACA 4415 wing model of chord length of 200mm, leading edge radius of 4.96mm and span of length 450 mm using a low speed open return wind tunnel with test section of 0.47m width, 0.47m height and 1.27m length. The wing model was subjected to several tests at two different speeds of 15m/s and 25m/s which corresponds to two different Reynolds numbers of 1.8A—10 5 and 3.1A—10 5 respectively. The result showed that for both speeds, the coefficient of lift increased as angle of attack increased and the maximum lift coefficient was 1.45 at 15m/s while at 25m/s, the coefficient of lift is 1.40, which is slightly less than that at 15m/s. The coefficient of drag also increased as the angle of attack increased from 0 0 to 18 0 and the maximum drag was 0.15 at 15m/s, while at 25m/s, the coefficient of drag is approximately 0.2 which showed that the wing has a very low drag coefficient. For pressure distribution, it was observed that there was no flow separation at low angle of attacks from -6Es to 0Es , but the flow began to separate at moderate angle of attack of 3 0 to 9 0 and fully separated at high angle of attacks of 12 0 to 18 0 with vortices for both speeds.
[1]
Rubiat Mustak.
Design and Construction of NACA-4415 Airfoil with Various Shaped Surface Modifications
,
2017
.
[2]
Mohammad Mashud,et al.
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SHAPED DIMPLES ON AIRFOILS
,
2015
.
[3]
W. A. Timmer.
Two-Dimensional Low-Reynolds Number Wind Tunnel Results for Airfoil NACA 0018
,
2008
.
[4]
Ali Turker Kutay,et al.
Closed- Loop Aerodynamic Flow Control of a Free Airfoil
,
2008
.
[5]
Fabrizio De Gregorio,et al.
Flow control on a high thickness airfoil by a trapped vortex cavity.
,
2008
.
[6]
Li Jiang,et al.
DNS for flow separation control around an airfoil by pulsed jets
,
2007
.
[7]
W.W.H. Yeung W.W.H. Yeung,et al.
LIFT ENHANCEMENT ON UNCONVENTIONAL AIRFOILS
,
2006
.
[8]
D. Munday,et al.
Experimental and Numerical Investigation ofAerodynamic Flow Control Using Oscillating Adaptive Surfaces
,
2002
.
[9]
A. Seifert,et al.
Active Flow Separation Control on Wall-Mounted Hump at High Reynolds Numbers
,
2002
.
[10]
Jamey Jacob,et al.
ACTIVE CONTROL OF SEPARATION ON A WING WITH CONFORMAL CAMBER
,
2001
.