An empirical examination of feedback : user control and performance in a hapto-audio-visual training environment

Utilising advanced technologies, such as virtual environments (VEs), is of importance to training and education. The need to develop and effectively apply interactive, immersive 3D VEs continues to grow. As with any emerging technology, user acceptance of new software and hardware devices is often difficult to measure and guidelines to introduce and ensure adequate and correct usage of such technologies are lacking. It is therefore imperative to obtain a solid understanding of the important elements that play a role in effective learning through VEs. In particular, 3D VEs may present unusual and varied interaction and adoption considerations. The major contribution of this study is to investigate a complex set of interrelated factors in the relatively new sphere of VEs for training and education. Although many of the factors appears to be important from past research, researcher have not explicitly studied a comprehensive set of inter-dependant, empirically validated factors in order to understand how VEs aid complex procedural knowledge and motor skill learning. By integrating theory from research on training, human computer interaction (HCI), ergonomics and cognitive psychology, this research proposes and validates a model that contributes to application-specific VE efficacy formation. The findings of this study show visual feedback has a significant effect on performance. For tactile/force feedback and auditory feedback, no significant effect were found. For satisfaction, user control is salient for performance. Other factors such as interactivity and system comfort, as well as level of task difficulty, also showed effects on performance.

[1]  R. Noe Trainees' Attributes and Attitudes: Neglected Influences on Training Effectiveness , 1986 .

[2]  Ana-Maria Marhan,et al.  Virtual Reality-Based Environments for Learning and Training , 2008 .

[3]  Henry Been-Lirn Duh,et al.  Effects of field of view on presence, enjoyment, memory, and simulator sickness in a virtual environment , 2002, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2002.

[4]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[5]  Domenico Pascarella,et al.  Dependability issues in visual-haptic interfaces , 2010, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[6]  Fei Wang,et al.  Generic and systematic evaluation of haptic interfaces based on testbeds , 2007, 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[7]  Dolores Karolick,et al.  Cognitive Styles and Feedback in Computer-Assisted Instruction , 1995 .

[8]  Saeid Nahavandi,et al.  Haptically enable interactive virtual assembly training system development and evaluation , 2009 .

[9]  E. Salas,et al.  Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. , 1993 .

[10]  R. Mayer,et al.  Maximizing Constructivist Learning From Multimedia Communications by Minimizing Cognitive Load , 1999 .

[11]  Ahmed Seffah,et al.  Towards a Metrics-Based Framework for Assessing Comprehension of Software Visualization Systems , 2007, HCI.

[12]  Ivan Poupyrev,et al.  3D User Interfaces: Theory and Practice , 2004 .

[13]  Xing-Dong Yang,et al.  Validating the Performance of Haptic Motor Skill Training , 2008, 2008 Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems.

[14]  Lin Chai,et al.  To have or have not: an examination of feedback, learner control knowledge type in online learning , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[15]  Eric N. Wiebe,et al.  A Comparison of Two Mental Workload Instruments in Multimedia Instruction , 2006 .

[16]  Liesbeth Kester,et al.  Dynamic task selection: Effects of feedback and learner control on efficiency and motivation , 2009 .

[17]  R. Mayer,et al.  Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments , 2007 .

[18]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[19]  Jon Pearce,et al.  An investigation of interactivity and flow: student behaviour during online instruction , 2004 .

[20]  Maria Virvou,et al.  On the usability and likeability of virtual reality games for education: The case of VR-ENGAGE , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[22]  Matthew Turk,et al.  Perceptual user interfaces , 2000 .

[23]  Debbie Stone,et al.  User Interface Design and Evaluation , 2005 .

[24]  P. Boulanger,et al.  Hapto-audio-visual environments for collaborative training of ophthalmic surgery over optical network , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Visual Environments and their Applications (HAVE 2006).