Are we using the right quality measures in multi-resolution data fusion?

To establish criteria to assess the quality of the fused images is not a simple task. Our premise was that the quality in data fusion depends on the application as well as on the approach used. The objective of this paper is to evaluate how efficient the current quality measures are to estimate the quality of fused images. In order to achieve that, three different types of wavelet transforms were selected and the results were assessed using different quality measures found in the literature. We concluded that the quality measures were efficient to validate the proposed criteria but some important considerations are done, especially that there is a need for quality measures that are not only based on the comparison between a fused image and an original/test one.

[1]  J. C. Price,et al.  Combining panchromatic and multispectral imagery dual resolution satellite instruments , 1987 .

[2]  L. M. T. de Carvalho Mapping and monitoring forest remnants: a multiscale analysis of spatio-temporal data , 2001 .

[3]  L. Wald,et al.  Fusion of satellite images of different spatial resolutions: Assessing the quality of resulting images , 1997 .

[4]  S. Sides,et al.  Comparison of three different methods to merge multiresolution and multispectral data: Landsat TM and SPOT panchromatic , 1991 .

[5]  Leila Maria Garcia Fonseca,et al.  Multiscale Feature Extraction from Images Using Wavelets , 2004 .

[6]  J. Schott,et al.  Resolution enhancement of multispectral image data to improve classification accuracy , 1993 .

[7]  Alfredo Huete,et al.  Assessing the seasonal dynamics of the Brazilian Cerrado vegetation through the use of spectral vegetation indices , 2004 .

[8]  Lucien Wald,et al.  Some terms of reference in data fusion , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[9]  Thierry Ranchin,et al.  Liu 'Smoothing filter-based intensity modulation: A spectral preserve image fusion technique for improving spatial details' , 2002 .

[10]  Xavier Otazu,et al.  Multiresolution-based image fusion with additive wavelet decomposition , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  L. Wald,et al.  Fusion of high spatial and spectral resolution images : The ARSIS concept and its implementation , 2000 .

[12]  Sergio Teggi,et al.  TM and IRS-1C-PAN data fusion using multiresolution decomposition methods based on the 'a tròus' algorithm , 2003 .

[13]  S. Mallat A wavelet tour of signal processing , 1998 .

[14]  J. Vrabel,et al.  Multispectral Imagery Advanced Band Sharpening Study , 2000 .

[15]  Brian Bouzas,et al.  Objective image quality measure derived from digital image power spectra , 1992 .

[16]  Luciano Alparone,et al.  Image fusion—the ARSIS concept and some successful implementation schemes , 2003 .

[17]  Thierry Blu,et al.  Using iterated rational filter banks within the ARSIS concept for producing 10 m Landsat multispectral images , 1998 .

[18]  Lucien Wald,et al.  Evaluation de la qualité des images multispectrales à haute résolution spatiale dérivées de SPOT , 1995 .

[19]  M. Wachowicz,et al.  Extraction of urban and rural features by using image fusion techniques and neural networks , 2002 .

[20]  Andrea Garzelli,et al.  Context-driven fusion of high spatial and spectral resolution images based on oversampled multiresolution analysis , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[21]  J. Chassery,et al.  The use of multiresolution analysis and wavelets transform for merging SPOT panchromatic and multisp , 1996 .