Is It Who You Are or Where You Live? Community Effects on Net Fertility at the Onset of Fertility Decline: A Multilevel Analysis Using Swedish Micro‐Census Data

This paper studies contextual effects on fertility at the onset of fertility decline in Sweden. We argue that the community exerts an influence on fertility when individuals belonging to a certain community are more similar to one another (within-area) in their reproductive behaviour than individuals living in another community (between-area). Our hypotheses are that community had a strong influence in the past but that it decreased over time as more individualistic values grew in importance. We expect that the community exerted a greater impact in the low socioeconomic groups as the elite were less constrained by proximity and, therefore, more exposed to new ideas crossing community borders. Using micro-census data from 1880, 1890, and 1900, we use multilevel analysis to estimate measures of intra-class correlation within areas. We measure net fertility by the number of own children under five living in the household to currently married women with their spouses present. Parish is used as proxy for community. Our results indicate that despite average differences in fertility across parishes, the correlation between individuals belonging to the same community is less than 2.5%, that is, only a negligible share of the number of children observed is attributable to true community effects. Contrary to our expectation, we do not find any substantial change over time. However, as expected, community has a greater impact in the low socioeconomic groups. Our findings suggest that it is who you are rather than where you live which explains fertility behaviour during the initial stages of the transition (Less)

[1]  G. Moon,et al.  Context, composition and heterogeneity: using multilevel models in health research. , 1998, Social science & medicine.

[2]  H. Goldstein Restricted unbiased iterative generalized least-squares estimation , 1989 .

[3]  G. Carlsson The decline of fertility: Innovation or adjustment process. , 1966, Population studies.

[4]  Basile Chaix,et al.  A brief conceptual tutorial on multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: investigating contextual phenomena in different groups of people , 2005, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[5]  Frederico Finan,et al.  Neighborhood Peer Effects in Secondary School Enrollment Decisions , 2009, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[6]  D. Reher Back to the basics: mortality and fertility interactions during the demographic transition , 1999, Continuity and Change.

[7]  P. Hedström Contagious Collectivities: On the Spatial Diffusion of Swedish Trade Unions, 1890-1940 , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  S. Ruggles,et al.  The North Atlantic Population Project: Progress and Prospects , 2011, Historical methods.

[9]  M. Dribe,et al.  Social class and net fertility before, during, and after the demographic transition: A micro-level analysis of Sweden 1880-1970 , 2014 .

[10]  Steven Ruggles,et al.  Big Data: Large-Scale Historical Infrastructure from the Minnesota Population Center , 2011, Historical methods.

[11]  R. Lee,et al.  Fertility decline in Prussia, 1875-1910: a pooled cross-section time series analysis. , 1994, Population studies.

[12]  S. Watkins From local to national communities: the transformation of demographic regimes in Western Europe 1870-1960. , 1990 .

[13]  H. Kohler Fertility and social interaction , 2001 .

[14]  Basile Chaix,et al.  A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: linking the statistical concept of clustering to the idea of contextual phenomenon , 2005, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[15]  Karsten Hank,et al.  Regional Social Contexts and Individual Fertility Decisions: A Multilevel Analysis of First and Second Births in Western Germany , 2001 .

[16]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  A texture-processing model of the ‘visual sense of number’ , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  Troy C. Blanchard,et al.  Why People Stay: The Impact of Community Context on Nonmigration in the USA , 2004 .

[18]  Kimberly S. Maier,et al.  Patient-Level and Hospital-Level Determinants of the Quality of Acute Stroke Care: A Multilevel Modeling Approach , 2010, Stroke.

[19]  T. Guinnane,et al.  Fertility transition in a rural, Catholic population: Bavaria, 1880–1910 , 2002, Population studies.

[20]  D. Reher,et al.  Rethinking Historical Reproductive Change: Insights from Longitudinal Data for a Spanish Town , 2007 .

[21]  P. Boyle,et al.  Contextualising demography: the significance of local clusters of fertility in Scotland , 2007 .

[22]  B Chaix,et al.  Individual and collective bodies: using measures of variance and association in contextual epidemiology , 2009, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[23]  P. Boyle,et al.  High Fertility in City Suburbs: Compositional or Contextual Effects? , 2007 .

[24]  S. Bremberg,et al.  Is there a “school effect” on pupil outcomes? A review of multilevel studies , 2006, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[25]  J. Merlo,et al.  Bringing the individual back to small-area variation studies: a multilevel analysis of all-cause mortality in Andalusia, Spain. , 2012, Social science & medicine.

[26]  M. Dribe Demand and supply factors in the fertility transition: a county-level analysis of age-specific marital fertility in Sweden, 1880-1930 , 2009 .

[27]  T. Guinnane The Historical Fertility Transition: A Guide for Economists , 2010 .

[28]  R. Lesthaeghe,et al.  Spatial continuities and discontinuities in two successive demographic transitions: Spain and Belgium, 1880-2010 , 2013 .

[29]  R. Johnston,et al.  ‘People Who Talk Together Vote Together’: An Exploration of Contextual Effects in Great Britain , 2000 .

[30]  H. Goldstein,et al.  Variance partitioning in multilevel logistic models that exhibit overdispersion , 2005 .

[31]  Guoxing Yu,et al.  Exploring school effects across southern and eastern African school systems and in Tanzania , 2008 .

[32]  R. Lesthaeghe On the Social Control of Human Reproduction , 1980 .

[33]  R. Mace,et al.  Community-level education accelerates the cultural evolution of fertility decline , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  T. Trussell,et al.  Technical note: finding the two parameters that specify a model schedule of marital fertility. , 1978, Population index.

[35]  S V Subramanian,et al.  The relevance of multilevel statistical methods for identifying causal neighborhood effects. , 2004, Social science & medicine.

[36]  T. Guinnane,et al.  Regions and Time in the European Fertility Transition: Problems in the Princeton Projects Statistical Methodology , 2007 .

[37]  John Cleland,et al.  Demand Theories of the Fertility Transition: An Iconoclastic View , 1987 .