A TAS1R receptor-based explanation of sweet ‘water-taste’

‘Water-tastes’ are gustatory after-impressions elicited by water following the removal of a chemical solution from the mouth, akin to colour after-images appearing on ‘white’ paper after fixation on coloured images. Unlike colour after-images, gustatory after-effects are poorly understood. One theory posits that ‘water-tastes’ are adaptation phenomena, in which adaptation to one taste solution causes the water presented subsequently to act as a taste stimulus. An alternative hypothesis is that removal of the stimulus upon rinsing generates a receptor-based, positive, off-response in taste-receptor cells, ultimately inducing a gustatory perception. Here we show that a sweet ‘water-taste’ is elicited when sweet-taste inhibitors are rinsed away. Responses of cultured cells expressing the human sweetener receptor directly parallel the psychophysical responses—water rinses remove the inhibitor from the heteromeric sweetener receptor TAS1R2–TAS1R3, which activates cells and results in the perception of strong sweetness from pure water. This ‘rebound’ activity occurs when equilibrium forces on the two-state allosteric sweet receptors result in their coordinated shift to the activated state upon being released from inhibition by rinsing.

[1]  H. Kasai Tonic inhibition and rebound facilitation of a neuronal calcium channel by a GTP-binding protein. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  S. Schiffman,et al.  Bitterness of sweeteners as a function of concentration , 1995, Brain Research Bulletin.

[3]  R. Harvey,et al.  Muscarinic regulation of cardiac ion channels , 2003, British journal of pharmacology.

[4]  B. Cooperman,et al.  A comprehensive model for the allosteric regulation of mammalian ribonucleotide reductase. Functional consequences of ATP- and dATP-induced oligomerization of the large subunit. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[5]  Xiaodong Li,et al.  Different functional roles of T1R subunits in the heteromeric taste receptors. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  L. Bartoshuk,et al.  Interactions between stimuli with different taste qualities. , 1973, Physiology & behavior.

[7]  R. Osman,et al.  Lactisole Interacts with the Transmembrane Domains of Human T1R3 to Inhibit Sweet Taste* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  G. Dubois,et al.  Unraveling the biochemistry of sweet and umami tastes. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  S. Schiffman,et al.  Sweeteners: state of knowledge review. , 1993, Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews.

[10]  T. Kenakin,et al.  G Protein-Coupled Receptor Allosterism and Complexing , 2002, Pharmacological Reviews.

[11]  L. Prézeau,et al.  Evolution, structure, and activation mechanism of family 3/C G-protein-coupled receptors. , 2003, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[12]  T. Costa,et al.  Historical review: Negative efficacy and the constitutive activity of G-protein-coupled receptors. , 2005, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[13]  H. Lawless,et al.  Bitter taste of saccharin and acesulfame-K. , 2002, Chemical senses.

[14]  Thomas Hofmann,et al.  Bitter Taste Receptors for Saccharin and Acesulfame K , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  J. Gent,et al.  Time course of gustatory adaptation , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  K. Dalziel A kinetic interpretation of the allosteric model of Monod, Wyman, and Changeux , 1968, FEBS letters.

[17]  Xiaodong Li,et al.  Human receptors for sweet and umami taste , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  R. Lefkowitz,et al.  Negative antagonists promote an inactive conformation of the beta 2-adrenergic receptor. , 1994, Molecular pharmacology.

[19]  S. Schiffman,et al.  Selective inhibition of sweetness by the sodium salt of +/-2-(4-methoxyphenoxy)propanoic acid. , 1999, Chemical senses.

[20]  S. Nakanishi,et al.  Structural basis of glutamate recognition by a dimeric metabotropic glutamate receptor , 2000, Nature.

[21]  Roman Osman,et al.  Identification of the Cyclamate Interaction Site within the Transmembrane Domain of the Human Sweet Taste Receptor Subunit T1R3*[boxs] , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  L. Prézeau,et al.  BAY36-7620: a potent non-competitive mGlu1 receptor antagonist with inverse agonist activity. , 2001, Molecular pharmacology.

[23]  William J. Lennarz,et al.  Encyclopedia of biological chemistry , 2004 .

[24]  L. Bartoshuk Water taste in man , 1968 .

[25]  L. Bartoshuk,et al.  Comparing sensory experiences across individuals: recent psychophysical advances illuminate genetic variation in taste perception. , 2000, Chemical senses.

[26]  M. MacDonald,et al.  Reversal of a full-length mutant huntingtin neuronal cell phenotype by chemical inhibitors of polyglutamine-mediated aggregation , 2005, BMC Neuroscience.

[27]  T. Kenakin G-protein coupled receptors as allosteric machines. , 2004, Receptors & channels.

[28]  N. Ryba,et al.  Mammalian Sweet Taste Receptors , 2001, Cell.

[29]  Wenner-Grenska samfundet,et al.  Olfaction and taste , 1963 .

[30]  B Cowart,et al.  Evaluating the 'Labeled Magnitude Scale' for measuring sensations of taste and smell. , 1996, Chemical senses.