Habitual travel behaviour: Evidence from a six-week travel diary

This paper introduces different methods to measure similarity of travel behaviour addressing the question of how repetitious travel behaviour actually is. It compares empirical results of the different methods based on the data from a six-week travel diary. In general, the results show that the day-to-day behaviour is more variable if measured with trip-based methods instead of methods based on time budgets. Furthermore, it is confirmed that the similarity declines if the method captures more of the complexity of the travel pattern. It is also shown that travel behaviour is neither totally repetitious nor totally variable. Even for the whole observation period, it is demonstrated that two days always have some common elements. Additionally, it is found that the different methods yield the same pattern of variability for different types of day. Travel behaviour is clearly more stable on work days. Similar results for all methods are also obtained concerning the question of how long the minimum period of observation should be. All measures show that the period should not be less than two weeks if one aims at measuring variability.

[1]  Torsten Hägerstraand WHAT ABOUT PEOPLE IN REGIONAL SCIENCE , 1970 .

[2]  E. I. Pas Toward the understanding of urban travel behavior through the classification of daily urban travel/activity patterns , 1980 .

[3]  Susan Hanson,et al.  ASSESSING DAY-TO-DAY VARIABILITY IN COMPLEX TRAVEL PATTERNS , 1982 .

[4]  David Sankoff,et al.  Time Warps, String Edits, and Macromolecules: The Theory and Practice of Sequence Comparison , 1983 .

[5]  Eric I. Pas,et al.  A Flexible and Integrated Methodology for Analytical Classification of Daily Travel-Activity Behavior , 1983 .

[6]  M. McNally,et al.  Travel/activity analysis: Pattern recognition, classification and interpretation , 1985 .

[7]  J. O. Huff,et al.  Classification issues in the analysis of complex travel behavior , 1986 .

[8]  Frank S. Koppelman,et al.  An examination of the determinants of day-to-day variability in individuals' urban travel behavior , 1986 .

[9]  M. Clarke,et al.  The significance and measurement of variability in travel behaviour , 1988 .

[10]  Henk Meurs,et al.  Biases in response over time in a seven-day travel diary , 1986 .

[11]  Eric I. Pas,et al.  INTRAPERSONAL VARIABILITY AND MODEL GOODNESS-OF-FIT , 1987 .

[12]  T. Hoorn,et al.  Regularity and irreversibility of weekly travel behavior , 1987 .

[13]  E. I. Pas Weekly travel-activity behavior , 1988 .

[14]  S. Hanson,et al.  Systematic variability in repetitious travel , 1988 .

[15]  Dirk Zumkeller,et al.  Ergebnisse einer Pilostudie : Nutzen und Realisierungsprobleme einer bundesweiten Paneluntersuchung zum Verkehrsverhalten , 1995 .

[16]  W C Wilson,et al.  Activity Pattern Analysis by Means of Sequence-Alignment Methods , 1998 .

[17]  Stabilität und Variabilität im Verkehrsverhalten , 2000 .

[18]  H. Aarts,et al.  THE AUTOMATIC ACTIVATION OF GOAL-DIRECTED BEHAVIOUR: THE CASE OF TRAVEL HABIT , 2000 .

[19]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Mobidrive - Längsschnitterhebungen zum individuellen Verkehrsverhalten: Perspektiven für raum-zeitliche Analysen , 2001 .

[20]  Modellierung der individuellen Verhaltensvariationen bei der Verkehrsentstehung , 2001 .

[21]  Ta Theo Arentze,et al.  Pattern Recognition in Complex Activity Travel Patterns: Comparison of Euclidean Distance, Signal-Processing Theoretical, and Multidimensional Sequence Alignment Methods , 2001 .

[22]  Ta Theo Arentze,et al.  A Position-Sensitive Sequence-Alignment Method Illustrated for Space–Time Activity-Diary Data , 2001 .

[23]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Observing the rhythms of daily life: A six-week travel diary , 2002 .