Similarity and dissimilarity as evidence in perceptual categorization

In exemplar models the similarities between a new stimulus and each category exemplar constitute positive evidence for category membership. In contrast, other models assume that, if the new stimulus is sufficiently dissimilar to a category member, then that dissimilarity constitutes evidence against category membership. We propose a new similarity–dissimilarity exemplar model that provides a framework for integrating these two types of accounts. The evidence for a category is assumed to be the summed similarity to members of that category plus the summed dissimilarity to members of competing categories. The similarity–dissimilarity exemplar model is shown to mimic the standard exemplar model very closely in the unidimensional domain.

[1]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Choice, Decision, and Measurement: Essays in Honor of R. Duncan Luce , 1997 .

[2]  S C McKinley,et al.  Investigations of exemplar and decision bound models in large, ill-defined category structures. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  William K. Estes,et al.  Classification and cognition , 1994 .

[4]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[5]  Safa R. Zaki,et al.  Prototype and exemplar accounts of category learning and attentional allocation: a reassessment. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  I. Mclaren,et al.  Tests of the Ratio Rule in Categorization , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[7]  Ian P. L. McLaren,et al.  Prototype effects and peak shift in categorization. , 1995 .

[8]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Comparisons between exemplar similarity and mixed prototype models using a linearly separable category structure , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[9]  Nick Chater,et al.  Sequence effects in categorization of simple perceptual stimuli. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  B. Murdock,et al.  The distinctiveness of stimuli. , 1960, Psychological review.

[11]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Central Tendencies, Extreme Points, and Prototype Enhancement Effects in Ill-Defined Perceptual Categorization , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[12]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. , 1997, Psychological review.

[13]  R. Shepard,et al.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. , 1987, Science.

[14]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Sequence effects in the categorization of tones varying in frequency. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  Safa R. Zaki,et al.  Exemplar and prototype models revisited: response strategies, selective attention, and stimulus generalization. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  M. Humphreys,et al.  A context noise model of episodic word recognition. , 2001, Psychological review.

[17]  E. E. Johns,et al.  Sharpening the echo: An iterative‐resonance model for short‐term recognition memory , 2005, Memory.

[18]  E. E. Johns,et al.  The effect of feature frequency on short-term recognition memory , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[19]  Gregory Ashby,et al.  Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  H. M. Hanson Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  D J Mewhort,et al.  The extralist-feature effect: evidence against item matching in short-term recognition memory. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[23]  W. K. Estes,et al.  Some Functions of Memory in Probability Learning and Choice Behavior1 , 1976 .

[24]  R. Shepard Stimulus and response generalization: deduction of the generalization gradient from a trace model. , 1958, Psychological review.

[25]  K. Lamberts Exemplar models and prototype effects in similarity-based categorization. , 1996 .

[26]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Absolute identification by relative judgment. , 2005, Psychological review.

[27]  R. Nosofsky Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  Robert M. Nosofsky,et al.  Dissociations Between Categorization and Recognition in Amnesic and Normal Individuals: An Exemplar-Based Interpretation , 1998 .

[29]  E. E. Johns,et al.  What information underlies correct rejections in short-term recognition memory? , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[30]  W T Maddox,et al.  Comparing decision bound and exemplar models of categorization , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  W. T. Maddox,et al.  Relations between prototype, exemplar, and decision bound models of categorization , 1993 .

[32]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Context theory of classification learning. , 1978 .