Modelling Environmental Responses of Plant Associations: A Review of Some Critical Concepts in Vegetation Study

The definition of vegetation types at different hierarchical levels, both to study the vegetation processes and for practical cartographic representation, is still considered a critical issue in many circles of plant ecologists. The problems are mainly related to the misleading idea that classification of the vegetation system, as developed by European phytosociologists during the last century within the discipline called syntaxonomy, would imply the assumption of the organismic concept of the plant community. After a short discussion on the role of Braun-Blanquet approach in plant ecology and in landscape ecology, the methods to detect multispecies responses along environmental gradients are briefly reviewed. In the main part of this article, we intend to stress that concepts considered critical, such as plant association and its ecological niche, are just operational tools that have nothing to do with the individualistic or organismic interpretation of plant communities in vegetation studies. Important to our views on vegetation, we believe that plant associations as well as the higher syntaxa can be regarded as fuzzy sets in an operational context for describing vegetation along ecological gradients in synthetic ways and can further the understanding of vegetation variation.

[1]  Madhur Anand,et al.  The Fundamentals of Vegetation Change - Complexity Rules , 2000 .

[2]  M. Austin,et al.  Searching for a model for use in vegetation analysis , 1980, Vegetatio.

[3]  H. Jeffreys The Logic of Modern Physics , 1928, Nature.

[4]  H. Gleason,et al.  The individualistic concept of the plant association , 1939 .

[5]  M. Sykes,et al.  Time and space in the community structure of a species-rich limestone grassland , 1995 .

[6]  明永 Plant succession と土壤反應との關係に就て , 1928 .

[7]  E. Rosch Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .

[8]  E. Raabe Über den “affinitätswert” in der pflanzensoziologie , 2004, Vegetatio.

[9]  F. B. Goldmith The Vegetation of Exposed Sea Cliffs at South Stack, Anglessey , 1973 .

[10]  P. White,et al.  On the existence of ecological communities , 1994 .

[11]  o. Prof. em. Dr. h. c. Heinrich Walter,et al.  Vegetation of the Earth and Ecological Systems of the Geobiosphere , 1983, Heidelberg Science Library.

[12]  D. W. Goodall,et al.  The continuum and the individualistic association , 1963, Vegetatio.

[13]  F. Kienast,et al.  A simulated map of the potential natural forest vegetation of Switzerland , 1993 .

[14]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects , 1998 .

[15]  Enrico Feoli,et al.  Syntaxonomy: A Source of Useful Fuzzy Sets for Environmental Analysis? , 1991 .

[16]  I. Hiscock Communities and Ecosystems , 1970, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[17]  J. Braun-Blanquet,et al.  Pflanzensoziologie: Grundzuge der Vegetationskunde. , 1967 .

[18]  E. Maarel,et al.  The Braun-Blanquet approach in perspective , 1975, Vegetatio.

[19]  H.-J. Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy set theory—and its applications (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[20]  Tomás Emilio Díaz González,et al.  Vascular plant communities of Spain and Portugal: addenda to the syntaxonomical checklis of 2001. Part 1 , 2002 .

[21]  M. Austin,et al.  New approaches to direct gradient analysis using environmental scalars and statistical curve-fitting procedures , 1984 .

[22]  Hermann Behling,et al.  Some interesting characteristics of the vegetation process , 2002 .

[23]  B. Mirkin Paradigm change and vegetation classification in Soviet phytocoenology , 2004, Vegetatio.

[24]  I. Jolliffe,et al.  Nonlinear Multivariate Analysis , 1992 .

[25]  D. H. Knight,et al.  Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology , 1974 .

[26]  Ladislav Mucina,et al.  European Vegetation Survey: update on progress , 1995 .

[27]  Jari Oksanen,et al.  Why the beta-function cannot be used to estimate skewness of species responses , 1997 .

[28]  László Orlóci,et al.  Biodiversity analysis: issues, concepts, techniques , 2002 .

[29]  Z. Woldu,et al.  Community Niche, an Effective Concept to Measure Diversity of Gradients and Hyperspaces , 1991 .

[30]  Earl Cox,et al.  The fuzzy systems handbook , 1994 .

[31]  János Podani,et al.  Introduction to the exploration of multivariate biological data , 2000 .

[32]  M. Palmer,et al.  Variation in species richness on small grassland quadrats: niche structure or small‐scale plant mobility? , 1995 .

[33]  Madhur Anand,et al.  Community-level analysis of spatiotemporal plant dynamics , 2000 .

[34]  L. Orlóci Pattern dynamics: an essay concerning principles, techniques, and applications , 2001 .

[35]  E. Feoli,et al.  A numerical phytosociological study of the summits of the majella massive (Italy) , 1977, Vegetatio.

[36]  Relations between community theory and community analysis in vegetation science: some historical perspectives , 1987 .

[37]  M. Anand,et al.  Chaotic dynamics in a multispecies community , 1997, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[38]  David J. Maguire,et al.  Geographical information systems : principles and applications , 1991 .

[39]  E. Biondi,et al.  Modeling environmental responses of plantassociations by fuzzy set theory , 2000 .

[40]  B. Mirkin Which plant communities do exist , 1994 .

[41]  E. Feoli,et al.  Model for the potential natural vegetation mapping of Friuli Venezia-Giulia (NE Italy) and its application for a biogeographic classification of the region , 2001 .

[42]  R. Whittaker,et al.  GRADIENT ANALYSIS OF VEGETATION* , 1967, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[43]  M. Carranza,et al.  Ecosystem classification and mapping: a proposal for Italian landscapes. , 2000 .

[44]  Luis Mateus Rocha Relative uncertainty: measuring uncertainty in discrete and nondiscrete domains , 1996, Proceedings of North American Fuzzy Information Processing.

[45]  I. R. Moraczewski,et al.  Fuzzy logic for phytosociology , 1993, Vegetatio.

[46]  M. Hill,et al.  NONLINEAR MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS , 1990 .

[47]  E. Maarel,et al.  The Braun-Blanquet Approach , 1978 .

[48]  J. Moravec Influences of the individualistic concept of vegetation on syntaxonomy , 1989, Vegetatio.

[49]  R. Ragade,et al.  Ecosystem analysis using fuzzy set theory , 1982 .

[50]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms , 1981, Advanced Applications in Pattern Recognition.

[51]  G. De’ath PRINCIPAL CURVES: A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR INDIRECT AND DIRECT GRADIENT ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[52]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  DISTANCE‐BASED REDUNDANCY ANALYSIS: TESTING MULTISPECIES RESPONSES IN MULTIFACTORIAL ECOLOGICAL EXPERIMENTS , 1999 .

[53]  Thomas B. Starr,et al.  Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity , 1982 .

[54]  E. Feoli,et al.  Evaluation of ordination methods through simulated coenoclines: Some comments , 1980, Vegetatio.

[55]  E. van der Maarel,et al.  Ordination of Plant Communities on the Basis of Their Plant Genus, Family and Order Relationships , 1972 .

[56]  L. Mucina,et al.  A coenocline of the high-ranked syntaxa of ruderal vegetation , 1989, Vegetatio.

[57]  László Orlóci,et al.  On Sample Size Optimality in Ecosystem Survey , 1991 .

[58]  M. Austin Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling , 2002 .

[59]  M. Austin,et al.  New approaches to direct gradient analysis using environmental scalars and statistical curve-fitting procedures , 1984, Vegetatio.

[60]  Madhur Anand,et al.  Complexity in Plant Communities: the Notion and Quantification , 1996 .

[61]  E. van der Maarel,et al.  Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity , 1979, Vegetatio.

[62]  S. Pignatti Towards a Prodrome of plant communities , 1990 .

[63]  E. Maarel,et al.  VARIATION IN VEGETATION AND SPECIES DIVERSITY ALONG A LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL GRADIENT , 1967 .

[64]  E. J. S.,et al.  Quantitative Plant Ecology , 1934, Nature.

[65]  R. Alkemade,et al.  Determining alternative models for vegetation response analysis: a non‐parametric approach , 1998 .

[66]  E. van der Maarel,et al.  Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity , 1979, Vegetatio.

[67]  M. Austin,et al.  Models for the analysis of species' response to environmental gradients , 2004, Vegetatio.

[68]  I. R. Moraczewski,et al.  Fuzzy logic for phytosociology , 1993, Vegetatio.

[69]  M. Hill,et al.  Data analysis in community and landscape ecology , 1987 .

[70]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making for leaders , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[71]  Mark E. Jensen,et al.  A guidebook for integrated ecological assessments , 2001 .

[72]  Vegetation mapping by integration of floristic analysis, GIS and remote sensing. An example from Tigray (Ethiopia) , 1998 .

[73]  Á. Penas,et al.  Syntaxonomical checklist of vascular plant communities of Spain and Portugal to association level , 2001 .

[74]  P. Digby,et al.  Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Communities , 1987, Population and Community Biology.

[75]  László Orlóci,et al.  Computer assisted vegetation analysis , 1991, Handbook of vegetation science.

[76]  F. B. Goldsmith The Vegetation of Exposed Sea Cliffs at South Stack, Anglesey: II. Experimental Studies , 1973 .

[77]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  A Theory of Gradient Analysis , 2004 .

[78]  H. Gleason The individualistic concept of the plant association , 1926 .

[79]  M. Austin,et al.  On non-linear species response models in ordination , 1976, Vegetatio.

[80]  Zhang Dayong An index to measure the strength of relationship between community and site , 1988 .

[81]  Enrico Feoli,et al.  Ordination Based on Classification: Yet Another Solution?! , 1991 .

[82]  R. J. Pool,et al.  Plant Succession. An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation , 1917 .

[83]  L. Orlóci Prospects and expectations: reflections on a science in change , 2001 .

[84]  M. Dale Do ecological communities exist , 1994 .

[85]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theory - and Its Applications , 1985 .

[86]  M. Sykes,et al.  What constitutes evidence of community structure? A reply to van der Maarel, Noest & Palmer , 1995 .

[87]  Jacek Malczewski,et al.  GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis , 1999 .

[88]  L. Zadeh Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility , 1999 .

[90]  M. Austin,et al.  A new model for the continuum concept , 1989, Vegetatio.

[91]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Multivariate Analysis , 1958, Nature.

[92]  L. Orlóci,et al.  On choosing a resemblance measure for non-linear predictive ordination , 1983, Vegetatio.

[93]  R. Whittaker Direct Gradient Analysis , 1978 .

[94]  Mike P. Austin,et al.  Continuum Concept, Ordination Methods, and Niche Theory , 1985 .

[95]  Ladislav Mucina,et al.  Classification of vegetation: past, present and future , 1997 .

[96]  Jackson R. Webster,et al.  Chapter 5 – HIERARCHICAL ORGANIZATION OF ECOSYSTEMS , 1979 .

[97]  Robert H. Whittaker,et al.  CONVERGENCES OF ORDINATION AND CLASSIFICATION , 1972 .

[98]  Ladislav Mucina,et al.  Twenty years of numerical syntaxonomy , 1989, Vegetatio.

[99]  László Orlóci,et al.  On hierarchical partitioning of an ecological complexity function , 2000 .

[100]  J. Wilson Who makes the assembly rules , 1994 .

[101]  M. Austin,et al.  Community theory and competition in vegetation. , 1990 .