Compact high performance spectrometers using computational imaging

Compressive sensing technology can theoretically be used to develop low cost compact spectrometers with the performance of larger and more expensive systems. Indeed, compressive sensing for spectroscopic systems has been previously demonstrated using coded aperture techniques, wherein a mask is placed between the grating and a charge coupled device (CCD) and multiple measurements are collected with different masks. Although proven effective for some spectroscopic sensing paradigms (e.g. Raman), this approach requires that the signal being measured is static between shots (low noise and minimal signal fluctuation). Many spectroscopic techniques applicable to remote sensing are inherently noisy and thus coded aperture compressed sensing will likely not be effective. This work explores an alternative approach to compressed sensing that allows for reconstruction of a high resolution spectrum in sensing paradigms featuring significant signal fluctuations between measurements. This is accomplished through relatively minor changes to the spectrometer hardware together with custom super-resolution algorithms. Current results indicate that a potential overall reduction in CCD size of up to a factor of 4 can be attained without a loss of resolution. This reduction can result in significant improvements in cost, size, and weight of spectrometers incorporating the technology.

[1]  Atsunori KANEMURA,et al.  Bayesian image superresolution and hidden variable modeling , 2010, J. Syst. Sci. Complex..

[2]  Michael Elad,et al.  Restoration of a single superresolution image from several blurred, noisy, and undersampled measured images , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[3]  R. M. Willett,et al.  Compressed sensing for practical optical imaging systems: A tutorial , 2011, IEEE Photonics Conference 2012.

[4]  David J. Brady,et al.  Multiframe image estimation for coded aperture snapshot spectral imagers. , 2010, Applied optics.

[5]  Charles Soussen,et al.  Joint K-Step Analysis of Orthogonal Matching Pursuit and Orthogonal Least Squares , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[6]  Aggelos K. Katsaggelos,et al.  Variational Bayesian Super Resolution , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  Lisimachos P. Kondi,et al.  An image super-resolution algorithm for different error levels per frame , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[8]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  A fast orthogonal matching pursuit algorithm , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP '98 (Cat. No.98CH36181).

[9]  Faramarz Farahi,et al.  Active illumination single-pixel camera based on compressive sensing. , 2011, Applied optics.

[10]  Stephen J. Roberts,et al.  Bayesian Methods for Image Super-Resolution , 2009, Comput. J..

[11]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Bayesian Image Super-Resolution , 2002, NIPS.

[12]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[13]  Shree K. Nayar,et al.  Video super-resolution using controlled subpixel detector shifts , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[14]  Lawrence Carin,et al.  Bayesian Compressive Sensing , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[15]  Terrance E. Boult,et al.  Efficient super-resolution via image warping , 2000, Image Vis. Comput..

[16]  David J. Brady,et al.  Coded-aperture Raman imaging for standoff explosive detection , 2012, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[17]  Yann LeCun,et al.  Convolutional Matching Pursuit and Dictionary Training , 2010, ArXiv.

[18]  M. Ng,et al.  Superresolution image reconstruction using fast inpainting algorithms , 2007 .