Interactions in an open‐inquiry physics laboratory

This is a naturalistic study of interactions in an open‐inquiry physics laboratory. The following aspects‐‐the nature of student‐‐student interactions, the nature of the peer group‐‐teacher interactions, the interactions involved in task management, and the views of students toward group work‐‐indicated some patterns. Primarily, students negotiated in a collaborative mode, an adversarial mode, and by following a majority rule. During the planning and the data interpretation phases of an experiment, interactions were primarily verbal and took shape according to the behaviour of participating individuals. From the analysis of the degree of participation by different members of a group, three major patterns of interaction emerged: symmetric, asymmetric, and shifting asymmetric. During the planning and the data interpretation sessions, interactions between the teacher and students were either a Socratic interlocution or a discussion between a coach and novices. During the data collection stage, the teacher pr...

[1]  G. Wheatley Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning , 1991 .

[2]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Learning How to Learn , 1984 .

[3]  S. Bossert,et al.  Chapter 6: Cooperative Activities in the Classroom , 1988 .

[4]  Pinchas Tamir,et al.  Training Teachers to Teach Effectively in the Laboratory. , 1989 .

[5]  Ann L. Brown Motivation to learn and understand: On taking charge of one's own learning. , 1988 .

[6]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .

[7]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Research on Science Laboratory Activities: In Pursuit of Better Questions and Answers to Improve Learning , 1990 .

[8]  R. Schmuck,et al.  Group Processes in the Classroom , 1975 .

[9]  E. Guba,et al.  Fourth Generation Evaluation , 1989 .

[10]  P. Cobb,et al.  Analogies from the philosophy and sociology of science for understanding classroom life , 1991 .

[11]  Judith T. Sowder,et al.  Research into Practice: Creating a Problem-Solving Atmosphere. , 1988 .

[12]  R. Slavin Synthesis of Research on Cooperative Learning. , 1981 .

[13]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[14]  J. Stutzman,et al.  The effects of controversy, concurrence seeking, and individualistic learning on achievement and attitude change , 1985 .

[15]  Scott B. Watson,et al.  Cooperative learning and group educational modules: Effects on cognitive achievement of high school biology students , 1991 .

[16]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Learning Science and the Science of Learning , 1988 .

[17]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Effects of single-sex and mixed-sex cooperative interaction on science achievement and attitudes and cross-handicap and cross-sex relationships , 1985 .

[18]  S. Grundy Curriculum: Product Or Praxis? , 1987 .

[19]  K. K. Cetina,et al.  The fixation of (visual) evidence , 1988 .

[20]  Peter Akinsola Okebukola,et al.  The relative effectiveness of cooperative and competitive interaction techniques in strengthening students' performance in science classes , 1985 .

[21]  J. Wertsch The zone of proximal development: Some conceptual issues† , 1984 .

[22]  C. A. Bowers,et al.  Responsive Teaching: An Ecological Approach to Classroom Patterns of Language, Culture, and Thought , 1990 .

[23]  Rachel Hertz-Lazarowitz,et al.  Student‐student interactions in science classrooms: A naturalistic study , 1984 .

[24]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Guided, Cooperative Learning and Individual Knowledge Acquisition , 2018, Knowing, Learning, and Instruction.

[25]  S. Bossert,et al.  Cooperative Activities in the Classroom , 1988 .

[26]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Teacher management and student engagement in high school science , 1987 .

[27]  Jere Confrey,et al.  Understanding Collaborative Learning: Small Group Work on Contextual Problems Using a Multi-Representational Software Tool. , 1991 .

[28]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  What happens in high school science classrooms , 1987 .

[29]  P. Eckert Adolescent social categories—Information and science learning. , 1990 .

[30]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  The Social Construction of Scientific Concepts or the Concept Map as Device and Tool Thinking in High Conscription for Social School Science , 1992 .

[31]  C. Geertz,et al.  The Interpretation of Cultures , 1973 .

[32]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  The Social Construction of Scientific Concepts or the Concept Map as Conscription Device and Tool for Social Thinking in High School Science. , 1992 .