Natural resources and the persistence of rural poverty in America: A Weberian perspective on the role of power, domination, and natural resource bureaucracy

This article explores the role of power theories of natural resources and the persistence of rural poverty. In particular, it examines the role of large‐scale interest groups that can dominate public natural resource bureaucracies and become one cause of rural poverty. Both the degree of domination and the forms of domination of natural resource agencies are examined. Through a comparative analysis of numerous agencies, interest groups, and resource bases, it is concluded that domination of agency policy is common in twentieth‐century America with some exceptions and that this domination is one cause of the creation and persistence of rural poverty in twentieth‐century America. Power theories of natural resources and the persistence of rural poverty must, however, be seen in interaction with other causes such as sociological theories of labor immobility.

[1]  Vine Deloria,et al.  One Hundred Million Acres , 1973 .

[2]  J. R. Moore.  Hardin, Charles M., Food and Fiber in the Nation's Politics, Vol. III, Technical Papers of the National Advisory Commission on Food and Fiber, Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1967, xi + 236 pp. (75¢ paper) , 1968 .

[3]  R. Underhill,et al.  They came here first , 1949 .

[4]  Thomas Vennum.  Wild rice and the Ojibway people , 1990 .

[5]  Ernest Gruening,et al.  The State of Alaska , 1954 .

[6]  G. Mcconnell,et al.  The Politics of Agriculture: Soil Conservation and the Struggle for Power in Rural America , 1952 .

[7]  Thorstein Veblen,et al.  Theory of Business Enterprise , 1904 .

[8]  T. Skocpol,et al.  State Capacity and Economic Intervention in the Early New Deal , 1982 .

[9]  G. Rogers.  Alaska in Transition , 1960 .

[10]  Indians of the Northwest Coast , 1956 .

[11]  T. Skocpol,et al.  Bringing the State Back In: On the Road toward a More Adequate Understanding of the State , 1985 .

[12]  T. Skocpol.  Bringing the State Back In: Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research , 1985 .

[13]  D. Gold,et al.  Recent Developments in Marxist Theories of the Capitalist State, Part I , 1975 .

[14]  Janet A. McDonnell.  The dispossession of the American Indian, 1887-1934 , 1991 .

[15]  W. L. Bryan,et al.  Montana's Indians: Yesterday and Today , 1986 .

[16]  K. Mcneil,et al.  Understanding Organizational Power: Building on the Weberian Legacy. , 1978 .

[17]  Robert Eyestone,et al.  Poverty and Politics: The Rise and Decline of the Farm Security Administration. , 1969 .

[18]  A. Gouldner,et al.  Metaphysical Pathos and the Theory of Bureaucracy , 1955, American Political Science Review.

[19]  E. Cahn,et al.  Our Brother's Keeper: The Indian In White America , 1969 .

[20]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Power, Rule and Domination : A Critical and Empirical Understanding of Power in Sociological Theory and Organizational Life , 1975 .

[21]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Frameworks of power , 1989 .

[22]  C. Perrow.  Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay , 1975 .

[23]  Ann Metcalf.  From Schoolgirl to Mother: The Effects of Education on Navajo Women , 1976 .

[24]  John Gaventa,et al.  Power and powerlessness : quiescence and rebellion in an Appalachian valley , 1981 .

[25]  Philip Selznick.  TVA and the grass roots , 1949 .

[26]  Gregory Hooks,et al.  From an Autonomous to a Captured State Agency: The Decline of the New Deal in Agriculture , 1990 .

[27]  J. Darden,et al.  Indians and Bureaucrats: Administering the Reservation Policy During the Civil War. , 1974 .

[28]  T. Skocpol,et al.  Bringing the State Back In , 1985 .