Neuromagnetic auditory steady state response to chords: Effect of frequency ratio

Perceptual degree of consonance or dissonance of a chord is known to be varied as a function of frequency ratio between tones composing the chord. It has been indicated that generation of a sense of dissonance is associated with the auditory steady-state response (ASSR) phase-locked to difference frequencies which are salient in the chords with complex frequency ratios. This study further investigated how the neuromagnetic ASSR would be modulated as a function of the frequency ratio when the acoustic properties of the difference frequency, to which the ASSR was synchronized, was identical in terms of its number, energy and frequency. Neuronal frequency characteristics intrinsic to the ASSR were compensated by utilizing responses to a SAM (Sinusoidally Amplitude Modulated) chirp tone sweeping through the corresponding frequency range. The results showed that ASSR was significantly smaller for the chords with simple frequency ratios than for those with complex frequency ratios. It indicates that the basic neuronal correlates underlying the sensation of consonance/dissonance might be associated with the attenuation rate applied to encode the input information through the afferent auditory pathway. Attentional gating of the thalamo-cortical function might also be one of the factors.

[1]  H J Steeneken,et al.  Interference between two simple tones. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  R. Plomp,et al.  Tonal consonance and critical bandwidth. , 1965, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  T W Picton,et al.  Human auditory steady state potentials. , 1984, Ear and hearing.

[4]  Larry E. Roberts,et al.  Frequency organization of the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response in normal hearing and in tinnitus , 2006, NeuroImage.

[5]  H. Helmholtz,et al.  On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music , 2005 .

[6]  C Pantev,et al.  A high-precision magnetoencephalographic study of human auditory steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  M Hämäläinen,et al.  Neuromagnetic steady-state responses to auditory stimuli. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  S. Taulu,et al.  Applications of the signal space separation method , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[9]  T. Picton,et al.  Human auditory steady-state responses: Respuestas auditivas de estado estable en humanos , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[10]  Gerald Langner,et al.  Periodicity coding in the auditory system , 1992, Hearing Research.

[11]  M Steinschneider,et al.  Consonance and dissonance of musical chords: neural correlates in auditory cortex of monkeys and humans. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  S. Taulu,et al.  Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  S. Makeig,et al.  A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Xiaoqin Wang Neural coding strategies in auditory cortex , 2007, Hearing Research.

[15]  Xiaoqin Wang,et al.  Sustained firing in auditory cortex evoked by preferred stimuli , 2005, Nature.

[16]  J.C. Mosher,et al.  Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  J Pernier,et al.  Neurophysiological mechanisms of auditory selective attention in humans. , 2000, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[18]  C E Schreiner,et al.  Neural processing of amplitude-modulated sounds. , 2004, Physiological reviews.

[19]  Christian Berger-Vachon,et al.  Relationship between loudness growth function and auditory steady-state response in normal-hearing subjects , 2008, Hearing Research.