Optimal Quantification of Contact Inhibition in Cell Populations.

Contact inhibition refers to a reduction in the rate of cell migration and/or cell proliferation in regions of high cell density. Under normal conditions, contact inhibition is associated with the proper functioning tissues, whereas abnormal regulation of contact inhibition is associated with pathological conditions, such as tumor spreading. Unfortunately, standard mathematical modeling practices mask the importance of parameters that control contact inhibition through scaling arguments. Furthermore, standard experimental protocols are insufficient to quantify the effects of contact inhibition because they focus on data describing early time, low-density dynamics only. Here we use the logistic growth equation as a caricature model of contact inhibition to make recommendations as to how to best mitigate these issues. Taking a Bayesian approach, we quantify the trade off between different features of experimental design and estimates of parameter uncertainty so that we can reformulate a standard cell proliferation assay to provide estimates of both the low-density intrinsic growth rate, λ, and the carrying capacity density, K, which is a measure of contact inhibition.

[1]  Jacques Prost,et al.  Compressive stress inhibits proliferation in tumor spheroids through a volume limitation. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[2]  L. G. Pillis,et al.  A Comparison and Catalog of Intrinsic Tumor Growth Models , 2013, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[3]  A. Tsoularis,et al.  Analysis of logistic growth models. , 2002, Mathematical biosciences.

[4]  C. Boone,et al.  CONTACT INHIBITION, MACROMOLECULAR SYNTHESIS, AND POLYRIBOSOMES IN CULTURED HUMAN DIPLOID FIBROBLASTS. , 1965, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Philip Gerlee,et al.  The model muddle: in search of tumor growth laws. , 2012, Cancer research.

[6]  Chu-qiang Li,et al.  The novel long intergenic noncoding RNA UCC promotes colorectal cancer progression by sponging miR-143 , 2017, Cell Death & Disease.

[7]  D. L. Sean McElwain,et al.  Travelling waves in a wound healing assay , 2004, Appl. Math. Lett..

[8]  Ruth E. Baker,et al.  Multiple types of data are required to identify the mechanisms influencing the spatial expansion of melanoma cell colonies , 2013, BMC Systems Biology.

[9]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  Contact inhibition in tissue culture , 1970, In Vitro.

[10]  David Basanta,et al.  A mathematical model of tumour self-seeding reveals secondary metastatic deposits as drivers of primary tumour growth , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[11]  Peter A. J. Hilbers,et al.  Optimal experiment design for model selection in biochemical networks , 2014, BMC Systems Biology.

[12]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  Contact inhibition and malignancy , 1979, Nature.

[13]  S. McCue,et al.  A Bayesian Computational Approach to Explore the Optimal Duration of a Cell Proliferation Assay , 2017, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology.

[14]  John K Kruschke,et al.  Bayesian data analysis. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[15]  M. Chaplain,et al.  Mathematical modeling of tumor growth and treatment. , 2014, Current pharmaceutical design.

[16]  David Basanta,et al.  SP-0013: A mathematical model of tumor self-seeding reveals secondary metastatic deposits as drivers of primary tumor growth , 2013 .

[17]  Nikolas K. Haass,et al.  Modeling Melanoma In Vitro and In Vivo , 2013, Healthcare.

[18]  Matthew J Simpson,et al.  Are in vitro estimates of cell diffusivity and cell proliferation rate sensitive to assay geometry? , 2014, Journal of theoretical biology.

[19]  Jonathan A. Sherratt,et al.  Models of epidermal wound healing , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  Philip K Maini,et al.  Traveling wave model to interpret a wound-healing cell migration assay for human peritoneal mesothelial cells. , 2004, Tissue engineering.

[21]  Ke Chen,et al.  Human MSCs promotes colorectal cancer epithelial–mesenchymal transition and progression via CCL5/β-catenin/Slug pathway , 2017, Cell Death and Disease.

[22]  Peter A. J. Hilbers,et al.  A Bayesian approach to targeted experiment design , 2012, Bioinform..

[23]  A. Sigal,et al.  Collective and single cell behavior in epithelial contact inhibition , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Michael P. H. Stumpf,et al.  Maximizing the Information Content of Experiments in Systems Biology , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[25]  Esha T. Shah,et al.  Logistic Proliferation of Cells in Scratch Assays is Delayed , 2017, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology.

[26]  Paul D. W. Kirk,et al.  Model Selection in Systems Biology Depends on Experimental Design , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[27]  Robert H. Austin,et al.  Probing the invasiveness of prostate cancer cells in a 3D microfabricated landscape , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Matthew J Simpson,et al.  Experimental and Modelling Investigation of Monolayer Development with Clustering , 2013, Bulletin of mathematical biology.