Dealing with small samples and dimensionality issues in data envelopment analysis

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a widely applied nonparametric method for comparative evaluation of firms’ efficiency. A deficiency of DEA is that the efficiency scores assigned to each firm are sensitive to sampling variations, particularly when small samples are used. In addition, an upward bias is present due to dimensionality issues when the sample size is limited compared to the number of inputs and output. As a result, in case of small samples, DEA efficiency scores cannot be considered as reliable measures. The DEA Bootstrap addresses this limitation of the DEA method as it provides the efficiency scores with stochastic properties. However, the DEA Bootstrap is still inappropriate in the presence of small samples. In this context, we introduce a new method that draws on random data generation procedures, unlike Bootstrap which is based on resampling, and Monte Carlo simulations.

[1]  R. Bartels,et al.  The Effect of Sample Size on the Mean Efficiency in DEA with an Application to Electricity Distribution in Australia, Sweden and New Zealand , 1998 .

[2]  Daniel Santín,et al.  How to generate regularly behaved production data? A Monte Carlo experimentation on DEA scale efficiency measurement , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  David Hinkley,et al.  Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife , 2008 .

[4]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Benchmarking with quality-adjusted DEA (Q-DEA) to seek lower-cost high-quality service: Evidence from a U.S.bank application , 2006, Ann. Oper. Res..

[5]  R. Banker.  Maximum likelihood, consistency and data envelopment analysis: a statistical foundation , 1993 .

[6]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[7]  B. Efron.  Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife , 1979 .

[8]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[9]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[10]  Léopold Simar,et al.  How to improve the performances of DEA/FDH estimators in the presence of noise? , 2007 .

[11]  Michael R Chernick,et al.  Bootstrap Methods: A Guide for Practitioners and Researchers , 2007 .

[12]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[13]  Peter Smith,et al.  Model misspecification in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[14]  Matthias Staat,et al.  The Effect of Sample Size on the Mean Efficiency in DEA: Comment , 2001 .

[15]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Efficiency Scores: How to Bootstrap in Nonparametric Frontier Models , 1998 .

[16]  P. J. Green,et al.  Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis , 1987 .