Cell cultures in microsystems: Biocompatibility aspects

Bio‐Micro‐Electro‐Mechanical Systems (BioMEMS) are a new tool in life sciences, supporting cell biology research by providing reproducible and miniaturized experimental platforms. In order to cultivate cells in such systems, appropriate microenvironmental conditions are required. Due to the multitude and variety of microbioreactors and cultivated cell types available, standardized cell handling methods and comprehensive biocompatibility data are sparse. The bioreactor developed at Ilmenau University of Technology features BioMEMS consisting of silicon, glass, and polymers, supplied by peripheral components. To verify the system's suitability for cell cultivation, it was necessary to prove whether materials and surfaces are biocompatible. Custom‐tailored biocompatibility test procedures along with adequate cell seeding and handling methods had to be developed. According to this, proper positive and negative control samples had to be identified. The cultivation procedures were carried out using osteoblast‐like murine fibroblasts (MC3T3‐E1) and primary human osteoblasts (hOB). We could provide evidence that cultivation of these cells in our BioMEMS is feasible. In this context the relevant materials and the system's structure can be regarded as to be biocompatible. We could show that cell seeding and handling methods possess a strong impact on growth, development, and cellular activity of cell cultures in BioMEMS. Statistical biocompatibility data for the materials used is given. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011; 108:687–693. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Hartmut Witte,et al.  A modular BioMEMS platform for new procedures and experiments in tissue engineering , 2009 .

[2]  Thomas Laurell,et al.  Developments toward a microfluidic system for long-term monitoring of dynamic cellular events in immobilized human cells. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[3]  C. Ince,et al.  A micro-perfusion chamber for single-cell fluorescence measurements. , 1990, Journal of immunological methods.

[4]  K. Furukawa,et al.  Oscillatory perfusion seeding and culturing of osteoblast-like cells on porous beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds. , 2008, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A.

[5]  A Pizzoferrato,et al.  Cell culture methods for testing biocompatibility. , 1994, Clinical materials.

[6]  Luke P. Lee,et al.  Continuous perfusion microfluidic cell culture array for high-throughput cell-based assays. , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[7]  Erich Wintermantel,et al.  Medizintechnik Life Science Engineering , 2008 .

[8]  M. Ladisch,et al.  Poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) and Silicon Hybrid Biochip for Bacterial Culture , 2003 .

[9]  Michael Stangegaard,et al.  A biocompatible micro cell culture chamber (microCCC) for the culturing and on-line monitoring of eukaryote cells. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[10]  Ales Prokop,et al.  NanoLiterBioReactor: Long-Term Mammalian Cell Culture at Nanofabricated Scale , 2004, Biomedical microdevices.

[11]  Shuichi Takayama,et al.  Microfluidic culture of single human embryonic stem cell colonies. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[12]  Gwo-Bin Lee,et al.  A microfluidic cell culture platform for real-time cellular imaging , 2009, Biomedical microdevices.

[14]  P. Krebsbach,et al.  Isolation and Characterization of MC3T3‐E1 Preosteoblast Subclones with Distinct In Vitro and In Vivo Differentiation/Mineralization Potential , 1999, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.