Single-trial analysis of readiness potentials for lower limb exoskeleton control

Bran-machine interface (BMI) can be used for controlling of external devices such as the exoskeleton, robot arm, etc. For efficient communication between a user and machine, fast and accurate detection of user intention is important elements in the BMI application. For this reason, readiness potential (RP) is a useful feature that is possible to detect movement intention before the movement onset. To our knowledge, however, the analysis of single-trial RP component has not been sufficiently investigated in the real-world application (e.g. powered exoskeleton or robot arm). In our study, we first validate a single-trial RP performance in the lower limb exoskeleton environment where the user allows for voluntary walking. The experiments are executed in the two different walking conditions which are normal and exoskeleton walking. The Laplacian and common average reference (CAR) filters are applied to reduce spatial noise and regularized linear discriminant analysis (RLDA) is used as a classifier. Our results show the averaged classification accuracy of 80.7% for 5 subjects. This study demonstrates a feasibility of RP-based BMI system for controlling of a lower limb exoskeleton.

[1]  Jose L. Contreras-Vidal,et al.  Design and Optimization of an EEG-Based Brain Machine Interface (BMI) to an Upper-Limb Exoskeleton for Stroke Survivors , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[2]  M. Hallett,et al.  What is the Bereitschaftspotential? , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  Andreea Ioana Sburlea,et al.  Continuous detection of the self-initiated walking pre-movement state from EEG correlates without session-to-session recalibration , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[4]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  A lower limb exoskeleton control system based on steady state visual evoked potentials , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[5]  Siamac Fazli,et al.  Development of an open source platform for brain-machine interface: openBMI , 2016, 2016 4th International Winter Conference on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI).

[6]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[7]  G. Berns,et al.  BAD TO WORSE , 1975, The Lancet.

[8]  Mads Jochumsen,et al.  Comparison of spatial filters and features for the detection and classification of movement-related cortical potentials in healthy individuals and stroke patients , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[9]  C. Neuper,et al.  Combining Brain–Computer Interfaces and Assistive Technologies: State-of-the-Art and Challenges , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[10]  Christa Neuper,et al.  Brain-Computer Communication System: The EEG-based Control of the Hand Orthesis in a Quadriplegic Patient , 1999 .

[11]  J. Millán,et al.  Single trial prediction of self-paced reaching directions from EEG signals , 2014, Front. Neurosci..