The Effect of Sensitivity Analysis on the Usage of Recommender Systems

Recommender systems have become a valuable tool for successful e-commerce. The quality of their recommendations depends heavily on how precisely consumers are able to state their preferences. However, empirical evidence has shown that the preference construction process is highly aected by uncertainties. This has a negative impact on the robustness of recommendations. If users perceive a lack of accuracy in the recommendation of recommender systems, this reduces their condence in the recommendation generating process. This in turn negatively inuences the adoption of recommender systems. We argue in this paper that sensitivity analysis is able to overcome this problem. Although sensitivity analysis has already been well studied, it was ignored to a large extent in the eld of recommender systems. To close this gap, we propose a research model that shows how a sensitivity analysis and the presence of uncertainties inuence decision condence and the intention to use recommender systems.

[1]  A. Tversky,et al.  The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  J. Christopher Westland,et al.  Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling , 2010, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[3]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  E-Commerce Product Recommendation Agents: Use, Characteristics, and Impact , 2007, MIS Q..

[4]  H. Simon,et al.  Models Of Man : Social And Rational , 1957 .

[5]  Wolfgang Raskob,et al.  Approaches to visualisation of uncertainties to decision makers in an operational Decision Support System , 2009 .

[6]  Rashmi R. Sinha,et al.  The role of transparency in recommender systems , 2002, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[7]  Nils Urbach,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling in Information Systems Research Using Partial Least Squares , 2010 .

[8]  E. Triantaphyllou,et al.  A Sensitivity Analysis Approach for Some Deterministic Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods* , 1997 .

[9]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[10]  Joseph A. C. Delaney Sensitivity analysis , 2018, The African Continental Free Trade Area: Economic and Distributional Effects.

[11]  Abdellah Salhi,et al.  Improving an optimization‐based framework for sensitivity analysis in multi‐criteria decision‐making , 2001 .

[12]  Hsi-Peng Lu,et al.  The effects of cognitive style and model type on DSS acceptance: An empirical study , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[14]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  John Riedl,et al.  E-Commerce Recommendation Applications , 2004, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[16]  H Christopher Frey,et al.  OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS , 2001 .

[17]  John Riedl,et al.  Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations , 2000, CSCW '00.

[18]  Simon French,et al.  Modelling, making inferences and making decisions: The roles of sensitivity analysis , 2003 .

[19]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The Construction of Preference: The Construction of Preference: An Overview , 2006 .

[20]  John W. Payne,et al.  Measuring Constructed Preferences: Towards a Building Code , 1999 .

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[22]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[23]  Simon French,et al.  Uncertainty and Imprecision: Modelling and Analysis , 1995 .