Blind Dates and Arranged Marriages: Longitudinal Processes of Network Orchestration

Using longitudinal qualitative and network data capturing five years of evolution of an interorganizational network, this paper explores network orchestration – the process of assembling and developing an interorganizational network. In particular, we analyze shifts in the network orchestrator’s actions and the network’s structure and composition. We find that an orchestrator builds the capacity to assemble a network over time through the accumulation of resources and specialized expertise. However, as the network develops, an orchestrator faces an evolving set of dilemmas arising from the need to demonstrate value for various members and audiences. To resolve these dilemmas, orchestrators may shift their actions, moving from initially encouraging serendipitous encounters between network members (“blind dates”) to increasingly selecting members and more closely influencing their interactions (“arranging marriages”). We discuss implications of our findings for a processual understanding of orchestrated network assembly and growth.

[1]  Harbir Singh Building firm capabilities through learning: the role of the alliance learning process in alliance capability and firm-level alliance success , 2007 .

[2]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[3]  Ron Adner,et al.  Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generations , 2009 .

[4]  L. Melin,et al.  Strategy as Practice: Research Directions and Resources , 2007 .

[5]  M. Chertow “Uncovering” Industrial Symbiosis , 2007 .

[6]  W. Powell,et al.  Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Centrality and network flow , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[8]  K. Provan,et al.  Interorganizational Networks at the Network Level: A Review of the Empirical Literature on Whole Networks , 2007 .

[9]  Benjamin Cashore,et al.  Legitimacy and the Privatization of Environmental Governance: How Non–State Market–Driven (NSMD) Governance Systems Gain Rule–Making Authority , 2002 .

[10]  K. Provan,et al.  Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness , 2007 .

[11]  M. Chertow,et al.  Quantifying economic and environmental benefits of co-located firms. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  M. T. Kennedy,et al.  Getting Counted: Markets, Media, and Reality , 2008 .

[13]  Nataša Golubovi,et al.  NETWORK STRUCTURE OF SOCIAL CAPITAL , 2010 .

[14]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis , 2005 .

[15]  W. Ashton Understanding the Organization of Industrial Ecosystems , 2008 .

[16]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[17]  M. Glynn,et al.  How New Market Categories Emerge: Temporal Dynamics of Legitimacy, Identity, and Entrepreneurship in Satellite Radio, 1990–2005 , 2010 .

[18]  Mark S. Mizruchi,et al.  Getting deals done: The use of social networks in bank decision-making , 2001 .

[19]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[20]  Martin Kilduff,et al.  A Paradigm Too Far? A Dynamic Stability Reconsideration of the Social Network Research Program , 2006 .

[21]  David Obstfeld Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation , 2005 .

[22]  D. Gibbs,et al.  Industrial ecology and eco‐industrial development: A potential paradigm for local and regional development? , 2005 .

[23]  Murat Mirata,et al.  Experiences from early stages of a national industrial symbiosis programme in the UK: determinants and coordination challenges , 2004 .

[24]  Siobhan O’Mahony,et al.  Nexus Work: Brokerage on Creative Projects , 2010 .

[25]  M. Patton Qualitative research & evaluation methods , 2002 .

[26]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[27]  Kun Huang,et al.  Governance and Collaboration: An Evolutionary Study of Two Mental Health Networks , 2010 .

[28]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[29]  John Scott Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[30]  Jennifer A. Howard-Grenville,et al.  The Social Embeddedness of Industrial Ecology , 2011 .

[31]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[32]  F. Hamprecht Introduction to Statistics , 2022 .

[33]  Kristian Möller,et al.  How to influence the birth of new business fields – network perspective , 2010 .

[34]  S. Wasserman,et al.  New Frontiers in Network Theory Development , 2006 .

[35]  Kenneth W. Koput,et al.  The Spatial Clustering of Science and Capital: Accounting for Biotech Firm-Venture Capital Relationships , 2002 .

[36]  Greta Hsu,et al.  Identities, Genres, and Organizational Forms , 2005 .

[37]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[38]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[39]  Julie M. Hite,et al.  The evolution of firm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm , 2001 .

[40]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Network Learning: The Effects of Partners' Heterogeneity of Experience on Corporate Acquisitions , 2002 .

[41]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Where Do Small Worlds Come From? , 2003 .

[42]  K. Möller,et al.  Rise of strategic nets — New modes of value creation , 2007 .

[43]  W. Ashton Understanding the Organization of Industrial Ecosystems A Social Network Approach , 2009 .

[44]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[45]  R. Gulati,et al.  Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[46]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Social Networks and Organizations , 2012 .

[47]  Kelley A. Packalen,et al.  Organizational and Institutional Genesis: The Emergence of High-Tech Clusters in the Life Sciences , 2010 .

[48]  Bernard L. Simonin The Importance of Collaborative Know-How: An Empirical Test of the Learning Organization , 1997 .

[49]  Ajay Agrawal,et al.  The Anchor Tenant Hypothesis: Exploring the Role of Large, Local, R&D-Intensive Firms in Regional Innovation Systems , 2003 .

[50]  R. Merton The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[51]  D. Ford,et al.  How should companies interact in business networks , 2002 .

[52]  R. Gulati Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation , 1999 .

[53]  Paul R. Kinnear,et al.  PASW Statistics 17 Made Simple , 2009 .

[54]  H. Rao The Social Construction of Reputation: Certification Contests, Legitimation, and the Survival of Organizations in the American Automobile Industry: 1895–1912 , 1994 .

[55]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[56]  Antonio Capaldo Network Structure and Innovation: The Leveraging of a Dual Network as a Distinctive Relational Capability , 2006 .

[57]  John F. Padgett,et al.  The Emergence of Organizations and Markets , 2012 .

[58]  Jennifer Howard-Grenville,et al.  Facilitating regional industrial symbiosis: Network growth in the UK’s National Industrial Symbiosis Programme , 2009 .

[59]  A. Langley Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[60]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Gatekeeper search and selection strategies: Relational and network governance in a cultural market , 2011 .

[61]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[62]  Kristian Möller,et al.  How to influence the birth of new business fields — Network perspective , 2009 .

[63]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  Networks in transition : How industry events (re)shape interfirm relationships , 1998 .

[64]  P. Bonacich Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification , 1972 .

[65]  Arvind Parkhe,et al.  Orchestrating Innovation Networks , 2006 .

[66]  A. Swaminathan,et al.  Framing Interorganizational Network Change: A Network Inertia Perspective , 2006 .

[67]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[68]  T. Snijders Models for longitudinal network datain , 2005 .

[69]  Kristian Möller,et al.  Metatheory of network management: A contingency perspective , 2009 .

[70]  Michael Lounsbury,et al.  Legitimating Nascent Collective Identities: Coordinating Cultural Entrepreneurship , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[71]  F. Thompson Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services , 1983 .

[72]  Tiina Ritvala,et al.  Value-based network mobilization: A case study of modern environmental networkers , 2010 .

[73]  K. Provan,et al.  Legitimacy Building in the Evolution of Small-Firm Multilateral Networks: A Comparative Study of Success and Demise , 2000 .

[74]  Marian Chertow,et al.  INDUSTRIAL SYMBIOSIS: Literature and Taxonomy , 2000 .

[75]  R. Wadhwani,et al.  Changing Landscapes: The Construction of Meaning and Value in a New Market Category—Modern Indian Art , 2010 .

[76]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study , 1999 .

[77]  Soong Moon Kang,et al.  Equicentrality and network centralization: A micro-macro linkage , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[78]  Aino Halinen,et al.  Using case methods in the study of contemporary business networks , 2005 .

[79]  E. Ostrom,et al.  The Struggle to Govern the Commons , 2003, Science.

[80]  Mark C. Suchman Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[81]  Yves L. Doz,et al.  Formation processes of R&D consortia: which path to take? Where does it lead? , 2000 .