Lesion detectability and quantification in PET/CT oncological studies by Monte Carlo simulations
暂无分享,去创建一个
F. Fazio | V. Bettinardi | I. Castiglioni | G. Rizzo | A. Savi | V. Bettinardi | F. Fazio | M. Gilardi | G. Rizzo | I. Castiglioni | A. Savi | M.C. Gilardi
[1] M. Sasaki,et al. The usefulness of FDG positron emission tomography for the detection of mediastinal lymph node metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a comparative study with X-ray computed tomography , 1996, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[2] S S Gambhir,et al. ROC and localization ROC analyses of lesion detection in whole-body FDG PET: effects of acquisition mode, attenuation correction and reconstruction algorithm. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[3] Lilli Geworski,et al. Recovery correction for quantitation in emission tomography: a feasibility study , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[4] E. Hoffman,et al. Quantitation in Positron Emission Computed Tomography: 4. Effect of Accidental Coincidences , 1981, Journal of computer assisted tomography.
[5] C. C. Watson,et al. New, faster, image-based scatter correction for 3D PET , 1999, 1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019).
[6] J. Zubieta,et al. Influence of spatially heterogeneous background activity on "hot object" quantitation in brain emission computed tomography. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.
[7] Claire Labbé,et al. An object-oriented library incorporating efficient projection/backprojection operators for volume reconstruction in 3D PET , 1999 .
[8] R. Kessler,et al. Analysis of emission tomographic scan data: limitations imposed by resolution and background. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.
[9] D. Visvikis,et al. Positron emission and computed X-ray tomography: a coming together , 2003, Nuclear medicine communications.
[10] F. Fazio,et al. Scatter correction techniques in 3D PET: a Monte Carlo evaluation , 1998, 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255).
[11] Giovanna Rizzo,et al. A Monte Carlo model of noise components in 3D PET , 2001 .
[12] D W Townsend,et al. Dual-modality PET/CT tomography for clinical oncology. , 2002, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology.
[13] M Schwaiger,et al. Metabolic characterization of breast tumors with positron emission tomography using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[14] M.C. Gilardi,et al. Data rebinning and reconstruction in 3D PET/CT oncological studies: a Monte Carlo evaluation , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..
[15] Elliot K Fishman,et al. Clinically occult recurrent ovarian cancer: patient selection for secondary cytoreductive surgery using combined PET/CT. , 2003, Gynecologic oncology.
[16] J Llacer,et al. ROC and LROC analyses of the effects of lesion contrast, size, and signal-to-noise ratio on detectability in PET images. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[17] M P Frick,et al. Diagnostic efficacy of PET-FDG imaging in solitary pulmonary nodules. Potential role in evaluation and management. , 1993, Chest.
[18] S. Gambhir. Molecular imaging of cancer with positron emission tomography , 2002, Nature Reviews Cancer.
[19] P B Hoffer,et al. Computerized three-dimensional segmented human anatomy. , 1994, Medical physics.
[20] Masatoshi Itoh,et al. Estimation of absorbed dose for 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-d- glucose using whole-body positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging , 1998, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[21] A. Olshen,et al. Imaging of oncologic patients: benefit of combined CT and FDG PET in the diagnosis of malignancy. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[22] H H Barrett,et al. Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[23] E. Hoffman,et al. Quantitation in Positron Emission Computed Tomography: 1. Effect of Object Size , 1979, Journal of computer assisted tomography.
[24] A. Chatziioannou,et al. Comparing lesion detection performance for PET image reconstruction algorithms: A case study , 1996, 1996 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record.