The concept of signal-to-noise ratio in the modulation domain and speech intelligibility.

A new concept is proposed that relates to intelligibility of speech in noise. The concept combines traditional estimations of signal-to-noise ratios (S/N) with elements from the modulation transfer function model, which results in the definition of the signal-to-noise ratio in the modulation domain: the (SN)(mod). It is argued that this (SN)(mod), quantifying the strength of speech modulations relative to a floor of spurious modulations arising from the speech-noise interaction, is the key factor in relation to speech intelligibility. It is shown that, by using a specific test signal, the strength of these spurious modulations can be measured, allowing an estimation of the (SN)(mod) for various conditions of additive noise, noise suppression, and amplitude compression. By relating these results to intelligibility data for these same conditions, the relevance of the (SN)(mod) as the key factor underlying speech intelligibility is clearly illustrated. For instance, it is shown that the commonly observed limited effect of noise suppression on speech intelligibility is correctly "predicted" by the (SN)(mod), whereas traditional measures such as the speech transmission index, considering only the changes in the speech modulations, fall short in this respect. It is argued that (SN)(mod) may provide a relevant tool in the design of successful noise-suppression systems.

[1]  A. M. Mimpen,et al.  Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. , 1979, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[2]  N. Viemeister Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  T. Houtgast,et al.  A review of the MTF concept in room acoustics and its use for estimating speech intelligibility in auditoria , 1985 .

[4]  R Plomp,et al.  The negative effect of amplitude compression in multichannel hearing aids in the light of the modulation-transfer function. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  T. Houtgast Frequency selectivity in amplitude-modulation detection. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  H T Bunnell,et al.  On enhancement of spectral contrast in speech for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  H.J.M. Steeneken,et al.  On measuring and predicting speech intelligibility , 1992 .

[8]  C Ludvigsen,et al.  Evaluation of a noise reduction method--comparison between observed scores and scores predicted from STI. , 1993, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[9]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  L M Hickson Compression Amplification in Hearing Aids. , 1994, American journal of audiology.

[12]  T. Dau,et al.  Intrinsic envelope fluctuations and modulation-detection thresholds for narrow-band noise carriers. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  H Dillon Tutorial Compression? Yes, But for Low or High Frequencies, for Low or High Intensities, and with What Response Times? , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[14]  I M Noordhoek,et al.  Effect of reducing temporal intensity modulations on sentence intelligibility. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  B. Kollmeier,et al.  Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation. I. Detection and masking with narrow-band carriers. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  T Houtgast,et al.  Compression and expansion of the temporal envelope: evaluation of speech intelligibility and sound quality. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  B. Moore,et al.  Benefits of linear amplification and multichannel compression for speech comprehension in backgrounds with spectral and temporal dips. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  W A Dreschler,et al.  Evaluation of spectral enhancement in hearing aids, combined with phonemic compression. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  H Levitt,et al.  Noise reduction in hearing aids: a review. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[20]  T Houtgast,et al.  A speech enhancement scheme incorporating spectral expansion evaluated with simulated loss of frequency selectivity. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Pamela E Souza,et al.  Effects of Compression on Speech Acoustics, Intelligibility, and Sound Quality , 2002, Trends in amplification.

[22]  Tammo Houtgast,et al.  A detailed study on the effects of noise on speech intelligibility. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.