Didactic discussion of stochastic resonance effects and weak signals.

A simple, paradigmatic, model is used to illustrate some general properties of effects subsumed under the label "stochastic resonance." In particular, analyses of the transparent model show that 1) a small amount of noise added to a much larger signal can greatly increase the response to the signal, but 2) a weak signal added to much larger noise will not generate a substantial added response. The conclusions drawn from the model illustrate the general result that stochastic resonance effects do not provide an avenue for signals that are much smaller than noise to affect biology. A further analysis demonstrates the effects of small signals in the shifting of biologically important chemical equilibria under conditions where stochastic resonance effects are significant.

[1]  R. Adair.  Biological responses to weak 60-Hz electric and magnetic fields must vary as the square of the field strength. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Robert K. Adair.  Comments on “trivial influences: A doubly stochastic poisson process model permits the detection of arbitrarily small electromagnetic signals” , 1995 .

[3]  R. Adair,et al.  Constraints of thermal noise on the effects of weak 60-Hz magnetic fields acting on biological magnetite. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  H. Dertinger,et al.  Stochastic resonance as a possible mechanism of amplification of weak electric signals in living cells. , 1994, Bioelectromagnetics.

[5]  R. Astumian,et al.  The response of living cells to very weak electric fields: the thermal noise limit. , 1990, Science.

[6]  Wiesenfeld,et al.  Theory of stochastic resonance. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[7]  Frank Moss,et al.  Noise enhancement of information transfer in crayfish mechanoreceptors by stochastic resonance , 1993, Nature.

[8]  R. Astumian,et al.  Rectification and signal averaging of weak electric fields by biological cells. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Adair,et al.  Constraints on biological effects of weak extremely-low-frequency electromagnetic fields. , 1991, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.