Quantifying the environmental performance of integrated bioethanol and biogas production

As the production of biofuels continues to expand worldwide, criticism about, e.g. the energy output versus input and the competition with food has been questioned. However, biofuels have the possibility to be optimized in order to improve the environmental performance. This could be accomplished through the use of concepts from industrial symbiosis. This paper provides a quantification of the environmental performance of industrial symbiosis in the biofuel industry through integration of biogas and ethanol processes using a life cycle approach. Results show that although increasing integration is assumed to produce environmental benefits, not all impact categories have achieved this and the results depend upon the allocation methods, energy system and assumptions chosen.

[1]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Marginal production technologies for life cycle inventories , 1999 .

[2]  Ari Nissinen,et al.  Analyzing the Environmental Benefits of Industrial Symbiosis , 2011 .

[3]  J. W. Ponton,et al.  Biofuels: Thermodynamic sense and nonsense , 2009 .

[4]  Sven Bernesson,et al.  A limited LCA comparing large- and small-scale production of ethanol for heavy engines under Swedish conditions , 2006 .

[5]  R. V. Berkel,et al.  Quantifying Sustainability Benefits of Industrial Symbioses , 2010 .

[6]  Magnus Karlsson,et al.  Evaluating the environmental benefits of industrial symbiosis: discussion and demonstration of a new approach , 2008 .

[7]  Niamh M. Power,et al.  How can we improve the energy balance of ethanol production from wheat , 2008 .

[8]  Helen H. Lou,et al.  Environmental impact assessment of different design schemes of an industrial ecosystem , 2007 .

[9]  Per Paulsson.  Energianalys av etanolproduktion , 2007 .

[10]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Agricultural crop-based biofuels – resource efficiency and environmental performance including direct land use changes , 2011 .

[11]  Mats Eklund,et al.  Improving the environmental performance of biofuels with industrial symbiosis , 2011 .

[12]  Ester van der Voet,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of biofuels, convergence and divergence , 2010 .

[13]  Marian Chertow,et al.  INDUSTRIAL SYMBIOSIS: Literature and Taxonomy , 2000 .

[14]  Milan Martinov,et al.  Applicability of biogas digestate as solid fuel , 2010 .

[15]  Michael Martin,et al.  Industrial Symbiosis for the development of Biofuel Production , 2010 .

[16]  M. Chertow,et al.  Quantifying economic and environmental benefits of co-located firms. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Good or bad bioethanol from a greenhouse gas perspective – What determines this? , 2009 .

[18]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[19]  A. Wolf,et al.  Using an optimization model to evaluate the economic benefits of industrial symbiosis in the forest industry , 2008 .

[20]  Shizuka Hashimoto,et al.  Quantitative assessment of urban and industrial symbiosis in Kawasaki, Japan. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  L. Sokka,et al.  Quantifying the total environmental impacts of an industrial symbiosis - a comparison of process-, hybrid and input-output life cycle assessment. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.