Comparative Efficacy of Three Suction Traps for Collecting Phlebotomine Sand Flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in Open Habitats

ABSTRACT: The efficacy of three suction traps for trapping phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) was compared. Traps were baited with CO2 and used without any light source. CO2-baited CDC traps were evaluated either in their standard downdraft orientation or inverted (iCDC traps). Mosquito Magnet-X (MMX) counterflow geometry traps were tested in the updraft orientation only. Both updraft traps (iCDC and MMX) were deployed with their opening ∼10 cm from the ground while the opening of the downdraft (CDC) trap was =40 cm above ground. Comparisons were conducted in two arid locations where different sand fly species prevail. In the Jordan Valley, 3,367 sand flies were caught, 2,370 of which were females. The predominant species was Phlebotomus (Phlebotomus) papatasi, Scopoli 1786 (>99%). The updraft-type traps iCDC and MMX caught an average of 118 and 67.1 sand flies per trap night, respectively. The CDC trap caught 32.9 sand flies on average per night, significantly less than the iCDC traps. In the Judean desert, traps were arranged in a 3×3 Latin square design. A total of 565 sand flies were caught, 345 of which were females. The predominant species was P. (Paraphlebotomus) sergenti Parrot 1917 (87%). The updraft traps iCDC and MMX caught an average of 25.6 and 17.9 sand flies per trap per night, respectively. The CDC trap caught 7.8 sand flies on average per night, significantly less than the iCDC traps. The female to male ratio was 1.7 on average for all trap types. In conclusion, updraft traps deployed with their opening close to the ground are clearly more effective for trapping sand flies than downdraft CDC traps in open habitats.

[1]  M. Cooperband,et al.  Comparison of plume structures of carbon dioxide emitted from different mosquito traps , 2006, Medical and veterinary entomology.

[2]  Z. Abdeen,et al.  Leishmaniasis in Israel and the Palestinian Authority. , 2004, Trends in parasitology.

[3]  W. Takken,et al.  Comparison of carbon dioxide‐baited trapping systems for sampling outdoor mosquito populations in Tanzania , 2000, Medical and veterinary entomology.

[4]  B. Alexander.  Sampling methods for phlebotomine sandflies , 2000, Medical and veterinary entomology.

[5]  Y. Schlein,et al.  Assessment of plant tissue feeding by sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) and mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). , 1995, Journal of medical entomology.

[6]  R. Lane,et al.  The relationship between CDC light‐trap and human‐bait catches of endophagic sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in the Peruvian Andes , 1995, Medical and veterinary entomology.

[7]  C. Mutero,et al.  Description and performance of an updraft trap for sandflies. , 1991, Tropical medicine and parasitology : official organ of Deutsche Tropenmedizinische Gesellschaft and of Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ).

[8]  R. Killick-Kendrick.  Phlebotomine vectors of the leishmaniases: a review , 1990, Medical and veterinary entomology.

[9]  R. W. Fay,et al.  Responses of adult Anopheles stephensi to light of various wavelengths. , 1972, Journal of medical entomology.

[10]  M. Yaman.  [Control of phlebotomine sandflies and the latest development in this field]. , 2008, Turkiye parazitolojii dergisi.

[11]  Y. Schlein,et al.  Leishmaniasis in the Jordan Valley II. Sandflies and transmission in the central endemic area. , 1982, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

[12]  D. J. Lewis.  A taxonomic review of the genus Phlebotomus (Diptera, Psychodidae) , 1982 .

[13]  J. Downing.  Statistical analysis and interpretation of mosquito light trap data. , 1976 .

[14]  M. Gillies.,et al.  The vertical distribution of mosquitoes flying over open farmland in the Gambia. , 1974, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.