Decision making with long-term consequences: temporal discounting for single and multiple outcomes in the future

Two experiments were conducted to investigate how individuals evaluate future outcomes. Normative decision models postulate that the value of future outcomes should be discounted as a function of time. The present research obtained discounted values for single outcomes in the future but did not obtain discounted values for outcomes presented in series. In Experiment 1, students evaluated (a) college-funding programs that required students to work to obtain support and (b) loans that required payments after completing college. A ratio-discounting function described the value of future support and deferred payments. In Experiment 2, students were asked to evaluate work-study programs that described variable support over 1 to 4 years

[1]  John B. Kidd,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives—Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1977 .

[2]  M. Kaplan,et al.  Human judgment and decision processes , 1975 .

[3]  W. Mischel,et al.  Waiting for rewards and punishments: effects of time and probability on choice. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  G. Ainslie.  Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. , 1975, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  R. M. Tarpy,et al.  Reinforcement delay: A selective review of the last decade. , 1974 .

[6]  C. Surber.  Effects of Information Reliability in Predicting Task Performance Using Ability and Effort. , 1981 .

[7]  Peter H. Schönemann,et al.  A note on additive functional measurement. , 1973 .

[8]  J. Ramsay,et al.  Analysis of pairwise preference data using integrated B-splines , 1981 .

[9]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Judgment and decision-making theory. , 1990 .

[10]  James Shanteau,et al.  5 – AN INFORMATION-INTEGRATION ANALYSIS OF RISKY DECISION MAKING , 1975 .

[11]  Barbara A. Mellers,et al.  Equity judgment: A revision of Aristotelian views. , 1982 .

[12]  M. Birnbaum.  The nonadditivity of personality impressions. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  W. Mischel,et al.  Preference for delayed reward as a function of age, intelligence, and length of delay interval. , 1962, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[14]  A. Tversky,et al.  Conjoint-measurement analysis of composition rules in psychology. , 1971 .

[15]  Charles Vlek,et al.  Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making , 1975 .

[16]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1966 .

[17]  Carl de Boor,et al.  A Practical Guide to Splines , 1978, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[18]  A. Rapoport,et al.  Discount rates inferred from decisions: an experimental study , 1987 .

[19]  U. Ben-Zion,et al.  Discount rates inferred from decisions: an experimental study , 1989 .

[20]  T. Koopmans.  Stationary Ordinal Utility and Impatience , 1960 .

[21]  M. Björkman,et al.  Decision making, risk taking and psychological time: Review of empirical findings and psychological theory , 1984 .

[22]  Jaap Van Brakel,et al.  Foundations of measurement , 1983 .

[23]  Clairice T. Veit,et al.  Scale-flee tests of an additive model for the size-weight illusion , 1974 .

[24]  W. Mischel,et al.  Young children's preferred attentional strategies for delaying gratification. , 1979 .

[25]  Michael H. Birnbaum,et al.  Judgments of differences and ratios of numerals , 1975 .

[26]  J. Miyamoto,et al.  A multiplicative model of the utility of survival duration and health quality. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  J. Frank Yates,et al.  Preferences for Deferred Losses , 1975 .

[28]  G. Loewenstein.  Anticipation and the Valuation of Delayed Consumption , 1987 .

[29]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[30]  M. Nisan,et al.  The effect of expected temporal distance on risk taking. , 1973 .

[31]  E. Ebbesen,et al.  Attention in delay of gratification. , 1970 .

[32]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  PREFERENCES OVER TIME , 1993 .

[33]  N. Anderson.  Functional measurement and psychophysical judgment. , 1970, Psychological review.

[34]  K. Renner.  DELAYED OF REINFORCEMENT: A HISTORICAL REVIEW. , 1964, Psychological bulletin.

[35]  W. Mischel,et al.  Effects of expected delay time on the subjective value of rewards and punishments. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  W. Mischel,et al.  Comparative effects of the reward stimulus and its cognitive representation in voluntary delay. , 1976 .

[37]  M. K. Stevenson.  The impact of temporal context and risk on the judged value of future outcomes , 1992 .

[38]  C. R. Deboor,et al.  A practical guide to splines , 1978 .

[39]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[40]  Marjorie K. Shelley.  Gain/Loss Asymmetry in Risky Intertemporal Choice , 1994 .

[41]  Michael H. Birnbaum,et al.  The devil rides again: Correlation as an index of fit. , 1973 .

[42]  Norman R. Draper,et al.  Applied regression analysis (2. ed.) , 1981, Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics.

[43]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Coping strategies and attentional mechanisms in self-imposed and externally imposed delay situations. , 1976 .

[44]  Norman H. Anderson,et al.  Methods of information integration theory , 1982 .

[45]  P. Schoemaker.  The Expected Utility Model: Its Variants, Purposes, Evidence and Limitations , 1982 .

[46]  A. Tversky.  Intransitivity of preferences. , 1969 .

[47]  M. K. Stevenson,et al.  A Discounting Model for Decisions With Delayed Positive or Negative Outcomes , 1986 .