When resistance is futile: consequences of failed counterarguing for attitude certainty.

This research tests the notion that attitudes after a failed attempt to counterargue may be stronger than attitudes after undirected thinking. Specifically, failed counterarguing may be accompanied by unique metacognitions that serve to strengthen the attitude. The present research examines this issue by giving participants a very strong message and instructing them to counterargue or simply think about the message. Across several experiments, attitudes were as favorable when individuals were trying to counterargue as when they were simply thinking, indicating that counterarguing failed to instill any extra resistance. However, attitudes were held with greater certainty following failed counterarguing compared with following undirected thinking. Furthermore, attitudes following failed counterarguing were more predictive of subsequent behavioral intentions. The metacognitions that follow failed counterarguing are addressed.

[1]  L. Festinger.  Informal social communication. , 1950, Psychological review.

[2]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[3]  W. Mcguire,et al.  EFFECTIVENESS OF FOREWARNING IN DEVELOPING RESISTANCE TO PERSUASION , 1962 .

[4]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[5]  M. Zanna,et al.  Attitudinal qualities relating to the strength of the attitude-behavior relationship☆ , 1978 .

[6]  L. Ross,et al.  Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence , 1979 .

[7]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion. , 1979 .

[8]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Effects of Forwarning of Persuasive Intent and Involvement on Cognitive Responses and Persuasion , 1979 .

[9]  S. Chaiken.  Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[10]  Martin Fishbein,et al.  Acceptance yielding and impact: cognitive processes in persuasion. , 1981 .

[11]  J. Brehm.  A theory of psychological reactance. , 1981 .

[12]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[14]  Dieter Frey,et al.  Recent Research on Selective Exposure to Information , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[15]  A G Greenwald,et al.  In search of reliable persuasion effects: III. The sleeper effect is dead. Long live the sleeper effect. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  W. Swann,et al.  Change through paradox: using self-verification to alter beliefs. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Michael Ross,et al.  Bolstering Attitudes by Autobiographical Recall , 1988, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[18]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. , 1989 .

[19]  Z. Kunda,et al.  The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  G. Peeters,et al.  Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Evaluations: The Distinction Between Affective and Informational Negativity Effects , 1990 .

[21]  F. Strack,et al.  Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. , 1991 .

[22]  Curtis P. Haugtvedt,et al.  Ego-Involvement and Persuasion: An Appreciative Look at the Sherif’s Contribution to the Study of Self-Relevance and Attitude Change , 1992 .

[23]  James W. Pennebaker,et al.  The Handbook of Mental Control , 1992 .

[24]  Gian Sarup,et al.  Social judgment and intergroup relations : essays in honor of Muzafer Sherif , 1992 .

[25]  Judith M. Tanur,et al.  Questions About Questions: Inquiries into the Cognitive Bases of Surveys , 1993 .

[26]  Judith M. Tanur,et al.  Questions About Questions: Inquiries into the Cognitive Bases of Surveys. , 1993 .

[27]  D. Gilbert.  The assent of man: Mental representation and the control of belief. , 1993 .

[28]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. , 1994 .

[29]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Why investigate metacognition , 1994 .

[30]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Metacognition : knowing about knowing , 1994 .

[31]  R. Petty,et al.  Elaboration as a Determinant of Attitude Strength: Creating Attitudes That Are Persistent, Resistant, and Predictive of Behavior , 1995 .

[32]  R. Petty,et al.  Attitude strength: An overview. , 1995 .

[33]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. , 1996 .

[34]  A. Kruglanski.  Motivated social cognition: Principles of the interface. , 1996 .

[35]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Are (some) reports of attitude strength context dependent , 1996 .

[36]  Patricia G. Devine,et al.  Attitude importance and resistance to persuasion : It's not just the thought that counts , 1996 .

[37]  J. N. Bassili.  Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. , 1996 .

[38]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Social Metacognition: An Expansionist Review , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[39]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  Experimental Induction of Biased Systematic Processing: The Directed-Thought Technique , 1998 .

[40]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. , 1999 .

[41]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. , 1999 .

[42]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[43]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Forming Judgments of Attitude Certainty, Intensity, and Importance: The Role of Subjective Experiences , 1999 .

[44]  Joseph P. Forgas,et al.  The Message Within : The Role of Subjective Experience In Social Cognition And Behavior , 2000 .

[45]  R. Petty,et al.  Ease of Retrieval Effects in Persuasion: A Self-Validation Analysis , 2002 .

[46]  R. Petty,et al.  What doesn't kill me makes me stronger: the effects of resisting persuasion on attitude certainty. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  P. Shrout,et al.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[48]  P. Shrout,et al.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[49]  Richard E Petty,et al.  Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: the self-validation hypothesis. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[50]  R. Petty,et al.  Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: the self-validation hypothesis. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[51]  Kimberly A. Cameron,et al.  Strategies for Resisting Persuasion , 2003 .

[52]  Richard E Petty,et al.  Overt head movements and persuasion: a self-validation analysis. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[53]  Serena Chen,et al.  Self-verification motives at the collective level of self-definition. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[54]  J. Weinberg.  Is resistance futile? , 2005, Cutis.