A review of ideomotor approaches to perception, cognition, action, and language: advancing a cultural recycling hypothesis

The term “cultural recycling” derives from the neuronal recycling hypothesis, which suggests that representations of cultural inventions like written words, Arabic numbers, or tools can occupy brain areas dedicated to other functions. In the present selective review article, we propose a recycling hypothesis for the ideomotor mechanism. The ideomotor approach assumes that motor actions are controlled by the anticipation of the expected perceptual consequences that they aim to generate in the environment. Arguably, such action–perception mechanisms contribute to motor behaviour for human and non-human animals since millions of years. However, recent empirical studies suggest that the ideomotor mechanism can also contribute to word processing, number representation, and arithmetic. For instance, it has been shown that the anticipatory simulation of abstract semantics, like the numerical quantitative value of three items can prime processing of the associated Arabic number “3”. Arabic numbers, words, or tools represent cultural inventions, so that, from a theoretical perspective, we suggest an ideomotor recycling hypothesis for the interaction with such artefacts. In this view, the ideomotor mechanism spreads its influence to other functions beyond motor control, and is recycled to flexibly adapt different human behaviours towards dealing with more abstract concepts.

[1]  C. Darwin The descent of man, and Selection in relation to sex, Vol 1. , 1871 .

[2]  P. Pye-Smith The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex , 1871, Nature.

[3]  HighWire Press Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[4]  W. James,et al.  The Principles of Psychology. , 1983 .

[5]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Number Coding in Association Cortex of the Cat , 1970, Science.

[6]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. , 1970, Psychological review.

[7]  W. Meck Postreinforcement signal processing. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[8]  A. Baroody Children's Mathematical Thinking: A Developmental Framework for Preschool, Primary, and Special Education Teachers , 1987 .

[9]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[10]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Cerebral activations during number multiplication and comparison: a PET study , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  T. Allison,et al.  Differential Sensitivity of Human Visual Cortex to Faces, Letterstrings, and Textures: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  W. Prinz Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .

[13]  M. Arbib,et al.  Language within our grasp , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[14]  R. J. Seitz,et al.  A fronto‐parietal circuit for object manipulation in man: evidence from an fMRI‐study , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.

[15]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  The Mathematical Brain , 1999 .

[16]  M. Thioux,et al.  Neuroanatomical Substrates of Arabic Number Processing, Numerical Comparison, and Simple Addition: A PET Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  P Haggard,et al.  The psychology of action. , 2001, British journal of psychology.

[18]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Common codes for situated interaction , 2001 .

[19]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[20]  A common framework for language comprehension and language production , 2001 .

[21]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Perspectives and problems in motor learning , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  Paul Cisek,et al.  Embodiment is all in the head , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[23]  B. Hommel,et al.  Effect anticipation and action control. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  W. Kunde,et al.  Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Representation of the Quantity of Visual Items in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex , 2002, Science.

[26]  J. Tanji,et al.  Numerical representation for action in the parietal cortex of the monkey , 2002, Nature.

[27]  I. Koch,et al.  Verbal response-effect compatibility , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[28]  Vincent Walsh A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  Joseph T Devlin,et al.  The myth of the visual word form area , 2003, NeuroImage.

[31]  B. Hommel,et al.  Acquisition and generalization of action effects , 2003 .

[32]  Richard A. Andersen,et al.  FMRI evidence for a 'parietal reach region' in the human brain , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  W. Prinz,et al.  The Ideomotor approach to action control: Implications for skilled performance , 2004 .

[35]  Dieter Nattkemper,et al.  The role of anticipation and intention in the learning of effects of self-performed actions , 2004, Psychological research.

[36]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Evolution of human cortical circuits for reading and arithmetic : The “ neuronal recycling ” hypothesis , 2004 .

[37]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  Anticipated Action Effects Affect the Selection, Initiation, and Execution of Actions , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[38]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  Intention-based and stimulus-based mechanisms in action selection , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  A parieto-frontal network for visual numerical information in the monkey. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Michael Andres,et al.  Number magnitude and grip aperture interaction , 2004, Neuroreport.

[41]  Armin Stock,et al.  A short history of ideo-motor action , 2004, Psychological research.

[42]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area , 2004, NeuroImage.

[43]  M. Pickering,et al.  Why is conversation so easy? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[45]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[46]  G. Lakoff,et al.  The Brain's concepts: the role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[47]  V Menon,et al.  Cerebral Cortex doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi055 Developmental Changes in Mental Arithmetic: Evidence for Increased Functional Specialization in the Left Inferior Parietal Cortex , 2005 .

[48]  Bernard Mazoyer,et al.  Word and non-word reading: What role for the Visual Word Form Area? , 2005, NeuroImage.

[49]  L. Fogassi,et al.  Functional properties of grasping-related neurons in the ventral premotor area F5 of the macaque monkey. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  Xavier Seron,et al.  Finger–digit compatibility in Arabic numeral processing , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[51]  Peter E. Keller,et al.  Exogenous and endogenous response priming with auditory stimuli , 2006 .

[52]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Goal Representation in Human Anterior Intraparietal Sulcus , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[53]  R. Milo,et al.  Tools, language and cognition in human evolution , 1995, International Journal of Primatology.

[54]  Michael Andres,et al.  Number magnitude potentiates action judgements , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[55]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cultural Recycling of Cortical Maps , 2007, Neuron.

[56]  J. Changeux,et al.  Les neurones de la lecture , 2007 .

[57]  W. Prinz,et al.  Perceptual resonance: action-induced modulation of perception , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[58]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  Getting a grip on numbers: numerical magnitude priming in object grasping. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[59]  W. Prinz,et al.  Activation of action rules in action observation. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[60]  Wilfried Kunde,et al.  No anticipation–no action: the role of anticipation in action and perception , 2007, Cognitive Processing.

[61]  Wilfried Kunde,et al.  Spatial Compatibility Effects With Tool Use , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[62]  S. Hurley The shared circuits model (SCM): how control, mirroring, and simulation can enable imitation, deliberation, and mindreading. , 2008, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[63]  G Rizzolatti,et al.  When pliers become fingers in the monkey motor system , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[64]  V. Gallese Mirror neurons and the social nature of language: The neural exploitation hypothesis , 2008, Social neuroscience.

[65]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  The neural substrate of the ideomotor principle: An event-related fMRI analysis , 2008, NeuroImage.

[66]  Giovanna Moretto,et al.  Grasping numbers , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[67]  Guilherme Wood,et al.  On the Cognitive Link between Space and Number: A Meta-Analysis of the SNARC Effect , 2008 .

[68]  Frank Domahs,et al.  Mind the gap between both hands: Evidence for internal finger-based number representations in children's mental calculation , 2008, Cortex.

[69]  M. Noël,et al.  Does finger training increase young children's numerical performance? , 2008, Cortex.

[70]  Michael Andres,et al.  Actions, Words, and Numbers , 2008 .

[71]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  The spatial representation of numbers: evidence from neglect and pseudoneglect , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[72]  Denise H. Wu,et al.  The common magnitude code underlying numerical and size processing for action but not for perception , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[73]  S. Dehaene Reading in the Brain: The Science and Evolution of a Human Invention , 2009 .

[74]  V. Walsh,et al.  The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[75]  W. Prinz,et al.  Movements, actions and tool-use actions: an ideomotor approach to imitation , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[76]  Arvid Herwig,et al.  Intention and attention in ideomotor learning. , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[77]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  Cognition and action , 2009 .

[78]  William W. Graves,et al.  Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[79]  A. Wenger,et al.  Reading in the brain , 2010 .

[80]  Etienne Olivier,et al.  Response–effect compatibility of finger–numeral configurations in arithmetical context , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[81]  Mauro Pesenti,et al.  Place and summation coding for canonical and non-canonical finger numeral representations , 2010, Cognition.

[82]  Michael L. Anderson Neural reuse: A fundamental organizational principle of the brain , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[83]  Arnaud Badets,et al.  Creating number semantics through finger movement perception , 2010, Cognition.

[84]  E. J. Capaldi,et al.  A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[85]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[86]  M. Ziessler,et al.  Binding in voluntary action control , 2010, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[87]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  When Digits Help Digits: Spatial–Numerical Associations Point to Finger Counting as Prime Example of Embodied Cognition , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[88]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The unique role of the visual word form area in reading , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[89]  Arnaud Badets,et al.  Finger-number interaction: an ideomotor account. , 2011, Experimental psychology.

[90]  Clare Press,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Action Observation and Robotic Agents: Learning and Anthropomorphism , 2022 .

[91]  Ezequiel Morsella,et al.  Traditional response interference effects from anticipated action outcomes: a response-effect compatibility paradigm. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[92]  Frank Domahs,et al.  The Influence of Implicit Hand-Based Representations on Mental Arithmetic , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[93]  B. Bahrami,et al.  Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics , 2012, Cortex.

[94]  P. Cardoso-Leite,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Action effect anticipation: Neurophysiological basis and functional consequences (cid:2) , 2022 .

[95]  Michael Andres,et al.  Common substrate for mental arithmetic and finger representation in the parietal cortex , 2012, NeuroImage.

[96]  J. Müsseler,et al.  Age Effects on Controlling Tools with Sensorimotor Transformations , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[97]  Semantic sides of three-dimensional space representation , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[98]  Arnaud Badets,et al.  Role of an ideomotor mechanism in number processing. , 2013, Experimental psychology.

[99]  Stephen J. Lycett,et al.  Animal Tool Behavior: The Use and Manufacture of Tools by Animals , 2013 .

[100]  M. Pickering,et al.  An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[101]  Michael L. Anderson,et al.  Neural reuse in the evolution and development of the brain: evidence for developmental homology? , 2013, Developmental psychobiology.

[102]  Good vibrations? Vibrotactile self-stimulation reveals anticipation of body-related action effects in motor control , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[103]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Evolution, brain, and the nature of language , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[104]  D. Caligiore,et al.  Vision, action and language unified through embodiment , 2013, Psychological research.

[105]  M. Potegal Revenge: an adaptive system for maximizing fitness, or a proximate calculation arising from personality and social-psychological processes? , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[106]  Michael C. Corballis,et al.  Mental time travel: a case for evolutionary continuity , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[107]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Communicative intentions can modulate the linguistic perception-action link , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[108]  F. Osiurak What Neuropsychology Tells us About Human Tool Use? The Four Constraints Theory (4CT): Mechanics, Space, Time, and Effort , 2014, Neuropsychology Review.

[109]  F. Osiurak,et al.  Pliers, not fingers: Tool-action effect in a motor intention paradigm , 2014, Cognition.

[110]  H. Spencer The Principles of Psychology - Vol. I , 2016 .