Comparative effects of driver improvement programs on crashes and violations.

Recent reviewers of well-controlled driver improvement program evaluations have suggested that some programs result in measurable reductions in violations but not crashes. A comprehensive review of 65 studies evaluating driver improvement activities was conducted to determine the generality of these findings and to explore possible explanations of the lack of correspondence between violation and crash effects. Nineteen studies evaluating 59 driver improvement activities were found to be methodologically adequate. The major findings of the review are: (1) that driver improvement activities generally do result in reductions in violations; (2) there is an unpredictable and sometimes undesirable effect on crashes even in the presence of desirable violation effects; and (3) the lack of correspondence between violation and crash effects is not explained by lack of statistical power or by the types of violations affected. Further examination of driver improvement interventions revealed no strong evidence for different effects related to characteristics such as direct vs. indirect participant contact and group vs. individual contact.

[1]  R C Peck,et al.  CALIFORNIA'S POST-LICENSING CONTROL REPORTING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM--A SUMMARY OF THE FIRST THREE YEARS OF RESULTS , 1983 .

[2]  N Kaestner,et al.  Accident and violation reduction through brief driver improvement interviews , 1967 .

[3]  Raymond C. Peck,et al.  THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ACCREDITED TRAFFIC VIOLATOR SCHOOLS IN REDUCING ACCIDENTS AND VIOLATIONS , 1980 .

[4]  C Fuchs,et al.  Wisconsin Driver Improvement Program: A treatment-control evaluation , 1980 .

[5]  W C Marsh,et al.  EDUCATIONAL APPROACHES TO DRIVER IMPROVEMENT: AN EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION WITH NEGLIGENT DRIVERS , 1978 .

[6]  P A O'Neall,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF TWO GROUP INTERVIEW AND TWO LETTER-CONTACT DRIVER IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS , 1975 .

[7]  Clifford J. Helander,et al.  INTERVENTION STRATEGIES FOR ACCIDENT-INVOLVED DRIVERS: AN EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF CURRENT CALIFORNIA POLICY AND ALTERNATIVES , 1984 .

[8]  D H Schuster.  FOLLOW-UP EVALUATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF DRIVER IMPROVEMENT CLASSES FOR PROBLEM DRIVERS , 1969 .

[9]  E G House,et al.  DRIVER IMPROVEMENT MEASURES: AN EVALUATION BASED ON CONVICTION AND CRASH RECORDS , 1976 .

[10]  Joanne O'Day.  A BEFORE AND AFTER ANALYSIS OF ACCIDENTS INVOLVING STUDENTS OF THE DEFENSIVE DRIVING COURSE , 1970 .

[11]  N Kaestner.  DRIVER IMPROVEMENT SCHOOLS--AN EVALUATION OF TWO PROGRAMS , 1980 .

[12]  N Kaestner,et al.  SUCCESSFUL ALTERNATIVES TO LICENSE SUSPENSION: THE DEFENSIVE DRIVING COURSE AND THE PROBATIONARY LICENSE , 1975 .

[13]  Daniel Kadell,et al.  The traffic safety impact of driver improvement countermeasures targeting 55-MPH speed limit compliance , 1984 .

[14]  C Lynn.  AN EVALUATION OF THE SHORT-TERM EFFECTS OF THE VIRGINIA DRIVER IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM , 1981 .

[15]  J L Nichols.  DRIVER EDUCATION AND IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS , 1970 .

[16]  John W Hutchinson,et al.  An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Televised Locally Oriented Driver Re-Education. , 1969 .

[17]  R S Coppin,et al.  A CONTROLLED EVALUATION OF GROUP DRIVER IMPROVEMENT MEETINGS. , 1961 .

[18]  T. Planek,et al.  An evaluation of the national safety council's defensive driving course in various states , 1974 .

[19]  Raymond C. Peck,et al.  Toward a Dynamic System of Driver Improvement Program Evaluation , 1976 .

[20]  Jon C. Prothero,et al.  Evaluation of an Experimental Treatment for Problem Drivers , 1978 .

[21]  A K Lund,et al.  A review of the literature evaluating the Defensive Driving Course. , 1985, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  E Brezina,et al.  A SKILLS-IMPROVEMENT APPROACH TO COLLISION REDUCTION , 1973 .

[23]  R. M. Harano,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF CALIFORNIA'S "GOOD DRIVER" INCENTIVE PROGRAM , 1974 .

[24]  R. Rosenthal.  Combining results of independent studies. , 1978 .

[25]  N Kaestner.  RESEARCH IN DRIVER IMPROVEMENT - THE STATE OF THE ART , 1968 .

[26]  Raymond C. Peck,et al.  MODIFYING NEGLIGENT DRIVING BEHAVIOR THROUGH WARNING LETTERS , 1970 .

[27]  Cheryl Lynn,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF THE VIRGINIA DRIVER IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ON NEGLIGENT DRIVING: 12 MONTH REPORT , 1982 .

[28]  P S Hill,et al.  Driving offenders and the defensive driving course--an archival study. , 1978, The Journal of psychology.

[29]  Raymond C. Peck,et al.  THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A UNIFORM TRAFFIC SCHOOL CURRICULUM FOR NEGLIGENT DRIVERS WITH DISCUSSION , 1971 .

[30]  D H Schuster.  The effectiveness of official action taken against problem drivers: A five-year follow-up , 1974 .

[31]  J E Overall,et al.  The significance of treatment effects across several independent studies. , 1981, Journal of psychiatric research.

[32]  D Kadell,et al.  POST LICENSING CONTROL REPORTING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM: NEGLIGENT OPERATOR PROGRAM COSTS AND EFFECTIVENESS , 1977 .

[33]  R C Peck,et al.  THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SHORT INDIVIDUAL DRIVER IMPROVEMENT SESSIONS , 1967 .