The Plain Web

The Web has become a popular starting point for many innovations targeting infrastructure, services, and applications. One of the challenges of today’s vast Web landscape is to monitor ongoing developments, put them into context, and assess their chances of success. One of the main virtues of a more scientic approach towards the Web landscape would be a clear dierentiation between approaches which build on top of the infrastructure of the Web, with little embedding into the landscape itself, and those that are intended to blend into the Web, becoming a part of the Web itself. One of the main challenges in this area is to understand and classify new developments, and a better understanding of various dimensions of Web technology design would make it easier to assess the chances of success of any given development. This paper presents a preliminary classication, and presents arguments how those factors inuence the chance for success.

[1]  C. M. Sperberg-McQueen,et al.  Extensible Markup Language (XML) , 1997, World Wide Web J..

[2]  David A. Duce,et al.  Scalable Vector Graphics SVG 1.0 Specification , 2000 .

[3]  Steven Pemberton,et al.  RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing A collection of attributes and processing rules for extending XHTML to support RDF , 2008 .

[4]  Dan Brickley,et al.  Rdf vocabulary description language 1.0 : Rdf schema , 2004 .

[5]  Jeremy J. Carroll,et al.  Resource description framework (rdf) concepts and abstract syntax , 2003 .

[6]  Douglas Crockford,et al.  The application/json Media Type for JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) , 2006, RFC.

[7]  Jonathan Robie,et al.  Editors , 2003 .

[8]  Andreas Neumann Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) , 2008, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[9]  Erik Wilde,et al.  SPath: a path language for XML schema , 2007, WWW '07.

[10]  David E. Millard,et al.  Web 2.0: hypertext by any other name? , 2006, HYPERTEXT '06.

[11]  Andrew L. Russell,et al.  'Rough Consensus and Running Code' and the Internet-OSI Standards War , 2006, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing.

[12]  Wendy Hall,et al.  The Semantic Web Revisited , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[13]  Roy T. Fielding,et al.  Principled design of the modern Web architecture , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Software Engineering. ICSE 2000 the New Millennium.

[14]  Roy T. Fielding,et al.  Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax , 2005, RFC.

[15]  Thomas Schwentick,et al.  Expressiveness of XSDs: from practice to theory, there and back again , 2005, WWW '05.

[16]  James A. Hendler,et al.  The Semantic Web" in Scientific American , 2001 .

[17]  Murray Maloney,et al.  SGML on the Web : small steps beyond H.T.M.L. , 1997 .

[18]  David Beech,et al.  XML-Schema Part 1: Structures Second Edition , 2004 .

[19]  Roy T. Fielding,et al.  Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax , 1998, RFC.

[20]  Tantek Çelik,et al.  Microformats: a pragmatic path to the semantic web , 2006, WWW '06.

[21]  P. ed Hoschka,et al.  synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL) 1.0 Specification , 1998 .

[22]  Mirina Grosz,et al.  World Wide Web Consortium , 2010 .

[23]  Mario Jeckle,et al.  Identical Principles, Higher Layers: Modeling Web Services as Protocol Stack , 2004 .

[24]  Roberto Chinnici,et al.  Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 1: Core Language , 2007 .